All user reviews for the Pioneer CDJ-1000 MK3

-How long have you use it?

for about 6 months


-Have you tried many other models before buying it?

Pioneer CDJ 2000 NDX 400


-What is the particular feature you like best and least?

start with less than platinum, pourais I say that there is not, eccepté lack the USB port at this moment we do not have another solution that was or CD timecode


for most, the jog is more perfect adjustment of the jog is very important I think is very callage the accuracy, loading tracks are not long, about 1 sd. the pitch is very precision, the conpteur BPM as short a perfect plate!!


-How would you rate the quality / price?


maintement are a pair of CDJ 1000 MK3 has about 1000 euros so a little more affordable

-With experience, you do again this choice? ...

yes, because even with age plates c is a product that is perfect!!

How long have you use it? I use it for almost 2 years.

Have you tried many other models before buying it? Yes, I tried the CDJ 800, 900 and 2000 from Pioneer also

What is so special that you like most and least?
The +: taking rapid hand
setting the jog wheel
design
indestructible material!
If the CD is ejected by mistake and reinserted into the deck, it will have memorized the location at which the CD is ejected

The -: no USB port

How would you rate the quality / price?
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
For more information, click on this link: http://bdou.blog.radiofg.com/1537/Test-Pioneer-cdj-1000-mk3/

The value for money is exaggerated but the material is well worth it!
Yes I do it again this choice sure!

I utlise since 2009

i esseyt nouveux the model cdj 850 900 2000 and 2000 nexus

most it is just a sublime platinum which all correct if the dj desu and good biensure

month bun Setting the usb but I think has not used much or afternoon but likes to fake it by computer and never as a shelter of dun beg windows or mac

Platinum is the rest day the best ever made by the pioneer 2000 took desu e maisj since 2011 is a shame because its already 15 years peuve say dj platinum sincro all because she is not even sure pioneer with its apparel e large ecrand the cdj 2000 REVEE which is true, but if not the rest remains on autent 1000MK3

I would choose to do so time pioneer not platinum as well as 1000MK3

I just bought a pair to replace my cdj 1000mk2.

Regarding the differences "aesthetic"
- Pitch metal
- Key "re-loop" Same as the master tempo, but lights up in orange (and therefore as the loop)
- Protection of mmc by a sliding cover

For changes more "technical":
- New graphic display (more information and better visibility), is particularly noticeable at the aficheur wave.
- Display in the center of the tray back in the tray, so seems bigger.
- Reading mp3
- Possibility to adjust the resistance of the plate is to say:
Bottom left wheel rule, the board is very "light", a back spin, and it turns bcp, much like the CDJ 800
Bottom right wheel, the plate is less flexible, much like the 1000, the first name.
In the middle or slightly right (gray area), feel like the mk2 looks like because roulments seem different, a little more fluid.
- Finally, to save her curls possibilté ds hot-loops, which allows to have four loops at the same tps, ca c is cool!

In short, qqs amliorations, much like the 100 MK1 mk2 qd is to retire lol.
Still very intuitive and a bit faster even than the 1000MK2, especially during a scratch after having made a search rapise, a loop ... etc.

JOperation the CDJ-100S for almost 10 years and dernierment I get a re-new hardware ...
2 CDJ-1000MK3 and Pioneer DJM800

your exact trs is just awesome
vinyl mode is very very very gnial I sell my vinyl table similar ... digital is finally arriving for real!

the loop / sampler with the cue record is really prcis and while SPDIF that the sound is studio quality .....
jai else try table with vinyl mode (Technics SL-DZ1200, Stanton, Denon, etc. ..) and the pioneer is still the new standard CDJ ... look no further ... c pioneer who makes the best stuff! !

if I'm satisfied??
prvu more than I will reply!

Djim

I have since May 2006 and are three times partient SAV I trs above the MK2 Pioneer largely silent suprieur reliability in the optical unit is really the shit he silent chang twice each time it is read and feel all the worse is not because of any MP3 I have, Pioneer does not understand why she DCON and the worst is that they do not want to hear it not even want to arrive late changers warranty and APRS are made how to pay for the optical unit 200 euros for a crap 2 me! they find the problem is hardware inademissible for the pro or the hardware that consommablent?!
The reliability is important when it is professional so every weekend they operate 22H 5am so look for the fans rather the previous version of the MK2 is not due you! !

Hello everyone,

So I'd like your opinion becaufe it's one month that I dig the head to see which products to choose to operate in the mix.

Currently I mix on turntables for years and I see that the vinyl starts to die and then it's very expensive .... ETC and saw for example with cdj MK3 could be creative but for what scares me is the bcp bcp bcp I bugs people have bugs with the mk3.

So I do not know what to choose as a material for mk3 or else buy a good buy serato and technics in order to mix with their mp3 or wav I need your opinion

which configuration is best for power mix techno, house with the possibility of scrath while staying in the evolution of the mix?

I have these two gems in recent days and that we re a night.

Just a notice that I hot complterais later HUGE!

Com I lose flavor to the mix because of lack of novelty vinyl (because CHRE) and a lot of cd title and I had no turntables cd adapted (I thought the scratch live but "heavy" computer implemented interface + + ... and for me this system type is missing mastertempo options such as the possibility to loop mmorisable ...)

I will be almost Spar prt me because I think my SL1210MK have less need now, I ask myself.

The price is certainly a hindrance but I do not know if I could do without these plates (unless APRS better or detoxification).

Couples with a DJM800 is a killing, do you think you fast for Ghetta or Clamaran.

Plus yeah look fabulous!

The exprience speak.

It's been a few weeks I have. They are extra. I knew because I had two Pioneer CDJ-800 before.
The loops are extremely accurate (possibility of stalling the entry and exit).
Where I spend as much time is stalling those famous curls. But once stored on the SD 64M, access times are very short. No loss of time to get hold of a loop or a CUE recorded.
There have bugs. For me, no bugs detected so far. I do not spare. But they are built on a ventilated cabinet. Maybe it plays in the operation. Brief.

Although they are a bit expensive but honestly, do it not, you will not regret it.
on the other hand, for that price, they could design a small panel with at least 5 to 10 HOT CUE (or loop) instead of three. It is true that on a CD, three hot cue is not much.
Readability: 10/10.
Scratch perfect.

They are at the TOP

- How long have you use it?

I had a Pioneer CMX 5000 for a year, and two 1000 MK2. I use the MK3 for 3 months soon.

- What is so special that you like most and least?

Goodies: The timing precision thanks to the large jog.
Pitch + / - 100% to make some really nice effects
Loops that are now registered on the Hot Cue and Memory Card, so for me after quite a mobile DJ (box, bar, etc. ..) is nickel
Even loops: Setting the port of entry and exit
Finally I like the look in the dark is not bad

Cons: The MP3 function, I do not use it, the only time I put an MP3 on it I did not see the display WAVE (maybe because I did not take long)
Well obviously the price that can block more than one purchase, but at least for me has paid for itself in months a week
Maybe a lack of effect but it is not so bad, there's just uploaded a 800 + DJM EFX 1000 and presto!
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
I tested the Denon DNS 3500: very good turntable, similar to the effects, but the tray: Can not mix ratrapper in tempo (have to use + and - below the pitch)
Also the CDJ 800 MK2: Hot Cue much but which are important for eg accapella.

- How would you rate the quality / price?

I do not comment further on this point (for the moment nothing is wrong). No party SAV so the price / quality ratio is respecté.A see
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

YES, of course! For those who mix the tempo and also for those who want quality mixes: MK3!