View other reviews for this product:
tony on-line
Published on 09/24/06 at 05:02
Best value:
Excellent
Hello,
> I use the CDJ since eures + years. They are present ds ttes my sheets (versions to choose from the following budgets: CDJ1000 or 800).
> CD robust and reliable in the functions requested. The little sister of their envious CDJ1000 nothing. Ideal for mixing in excellent conditions, they offer all the guarantees if vs want to stay in budget - expensive than the 1000.
For those who mix across our small planet like me, this is a reference that is found in almost all providers.
> Since the advent of CD players-flat, I used the Pioneer. Not that I'm an aficionado of the brand, but by early next + "platinum reference" ds heads available data sheets.
> Good value for money, (quite rare pioneer !!!). This explains my final grade + high compared to the CDJ1000.
> Why change? Maybe for testing products from the competition. Always be his own opinion.
> I use the CDJ since eures + years. They are present ds ttes my sheets (versions to choose from the following budgets: CDJ1000 or 800).
> CD robust and reliable in the functions requested. The little sister of their envious CDJ1000 nothing. Ideal for mixing in excellent conditions, they offer all the guarantees if vs want to stay in budget - expensive than the 1000.
For those who mix across our small planet like me, this is a reference that is found in almost all providers.
> Since the advent of CD players-flat, I used the Pioneer. Not that I'm an aficionado of the brand, but by early next + "platinum reference" ds heads available data sheets.
> Good value for money, (quite rare pioneer !!!). This explains my final grade + high compared to the CDJ1000.
> Why change? Maybe for testing products from the competition. Always be his own opinion.