Mexican
while the rest has already been said ...

I just made a small change history BEYOND make it more "faithful" to the original ... must know that the pots were 1M, and the reissue, will understand why they have done for the 250k! ho hum for wide range, the sound was boomy one side, a little deaf ... so I replaced the pot with a 500k micro neck ... I gained much clarity ...

7 / 10 because of this ridiculous story of pots

UTILIZATION

Fast Channel, I find ...
access to acute I do not know too much, I rarely go ...
Ergonomics ... what a tele I find it quite heavy but well balanced
we get easily a good sound

SOUNDS

I have three basic sounds:

clean: bridge, it snaps like a lot, very hot very round neck is my favorite
with slight distortion pro co rat: a little bridge that hard anyway, not a fan, perfect neck
lead to my amp (mesa caliber 50 +): I do not know who said it was not suitable for big sound but I do not agree ... on the neck you lose a little precision, but it's slime that her little effect on the bridge that knocks sec, I love

there is no sound that I really hate the bridge with his co pro is a bit aggressive but I settled for lem ICRO neck ... so here goes ...

I love the sound of this skyscraper ...

OVERALL OPINION

I do not notice the hot ... So I use it for over a year (almost two even)
I love the telecaster ... I do not know why! that's how! sound, look ... I have an old squier telecaster silver series on which I had built a one humbucker epiphone (and those of you Will know us by the trail of dead ) And I told myself that my next tv will have a big microphone ... no fender humbucker in series, but the wide range found on the deluxe, custom and Thinline are really good, half way between single and double ...

Briefly, the look and tone of a tele with a potato sg

I tried several tele, Start, Ibanez, jackson

value for the price is right and do it again of course I did! I really like the scratches