PT-2000 classified ad
New ad alertImages
Reviews
4.0/5(5 reviews)
80 %
Write a user review
madkevilPublished on 06/13/08 at 16:09 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The most I can say the sound qualiter (vinyl forces), the less scratch is not terrible ....
Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
No, I just test its big sister the pt-1000! With some settings in addition otherwise comes to the same ca ...
- How do you report qualitprix?
The quality for the price is very good
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Not these plates are very good for a beginning, for the rest I personally investiserai a Vestax or technics, with it's I would go not very far
The most I can say the sound qualiter (vinyl forces), the less scratch is not terrible ....
Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
No, I just test its big sister the pt-1000! With some settings in addition otherwise comes to the same ca ...
- How do you report qualitprix?
The quality for the price is very good
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Not these plates are very good for a beginning, for the rest I personally investiserai a Vestax or technics, with it's I would go not very far
00
»
mosh555Published on 09/02/14 at 11:04 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Acquired used there six months (the plate dated 2002 I think)
I tried Technics SL 1200 MK2 and Reloop RP 4000 The Gemini behaves more like the Reloop Technics, the pitch is more accurate, the machine is heavier, a bit more powerful than the Reloop engine.
What I like most is the accuracy of the pitch, what I like least is the plastic body (looks a bit cheap compared to the Technics).
It is ideally suited for mixing (I do not know for scratching).
Bought a hundred Euros, the price / quality ratio is excellent.
With the experience I would do this choice because it is of robust construction (everything but the engine is copied Technics) and remains accurate despite its age.
...…
I tried Technics SL 1200 MK2 and Reloop RP 4000 The Gemini behaves more like the Reloop Technics, the pitch is more accurate, the machine is heavier, a bit more powerful than the Reloop engine.
What I like most is the accuracy of the pitch, what I like least is the plastic body (looks a bit cheap compared to the Technics).
It is ideally suited for mixing (I do not know for scratching).
Bought a hundred Euros, the price / quality ratio is excellent.
With the experience I would do this choice because it is of robust construction (everything but the engine is copied Technics) and remains accurate despite its age.
...…
Read more
Acquired used there six months (the plate dated 2002 I think)
I tried Technics SL 1200 MK2 and Reloop RP 4000 The Gemini behaves more like the Reloop Technics, the pitch is more accurate, the machine is heavier, a bit more powerful than the Reloop engine.
What I like most is the accuracy of the pitch, what I like least is the plastic body (looks a bit cheap compared to the Technics).
It is ideally suited for mixing (I do not know for scratching).
Bought a hundred Euros, the price / quality ratio is excellent.
With the experience I would do this choice because it is of robust construction (everything but the engine is copied Technics) and remains accurate despite its age.
I advise
I tried Technics SL 1200 MK2 and Reloop RP 4000 The Gemini behaves more like the Reloop Technics, the pitch is more accurate, the machine is heavier, a bit more powerful than the Reloop engine.
What I like most is the accuracy of the pitch, what I like least is the plastic body (looks a bit cheap compared to the Technics).
It is ideally suited for mixing (I do not know for scratching).
Bought a hundred Euros, the price / quality ratio is excellent.
With the experience I would do this choice because it is of robust construction (everything but the engine is copied Technics) and remains accurate despite its age.
I advise
See less
00
»
fuzznecPublished on 05/31/06 at 12:51 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I have used this table for over 2 years and I have been satisfied.
Trivia: a pitch electronic parts to fail and I have to ask me directly to the Gemini has no duplicate mailings and postage. It 's service!
There's a good feeling on this table, a lot of torque for mix.Design much like a technics (although not very nice pitch button quartz). The Start / Stop button is a bit small with an odd frame. But is the table is great!
I have had the pleasure of Gemini!
Trivia: a pitch electronic parts to fail and I have to ask me directly to the Gemini has no duplicate mailings and postage. It 's service!
There's a good feeling on this table, a lot of torque for mix.Design much like a technics (although not very nice pitch button quartz). The Start / Stop button is a bit small with an odd frame. But is the table is great!
I have had the pleasure of Gemini!
21
»
Tms1Published on 07/11/06 at 07:41 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I had these decks for over 2 years and beginning it's really ideal because it is an entry level deck with a good plateau, high torque direct drive, AC can start on the turntables too expensive and when you mixerez on high-end turntables you will feel very comfortable directly, the opposite is impossible, so you will be a kind of dj road. at the same stage in it are strong enough as it is already running for more than five years without any problem
10
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Gemini DJ
- Model: PT-2000
- Category: Turntables
- Added in our database on: 07/24/2003
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in DJ players
Other names: pt 2000, pt2000, pt 20 00, pt20 00