Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Roland Fantom X6
Images
1/318

All user reviews of 3/5 for the Roland Fantom X6

Workstation from Roland belonging to the Fantom series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Filter
4.5/5
(18 reviews)
61 %
(11 reviews)
28 %
(5 reviews)
11 %
(2 reviews)
Write a user review
Value For Money : Excellent
Users reviews
  • chninkelchninkel

    Roland Fantom X6Published on 01/03/07 at 08:07
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    For specifications: more appealing, everything has been said.

    UTILIZATION

    Simple operation, if one considers the cascading menu as ergonomic.
    Edition could not be more simple with respect even sounds simplistic. As against a very big nod to the effects. We regret that there have almost three MFX.

    SOUNDS

    The database programs are ... old. There I found the presets JV80 (which itself had already sounds D50) with the same quality same with my old JD800. But it is a matter of taste. Duplicates in different banks ROM. Here is the first time I've seen here.

    Realism varies from good to bad for some (wind instruments and electric guitars crying, pianos and strings very go…
    Read more
    For specifications: more appealing, everything has been said.

    UTILIZATION

    Simple operation, if one considers the cascading menu as ergonomic.
    Edition could not be more simple with respect even sounds simplistic. As against a very big nod to the effects. We regret that there have almost three MFX.

    SOUNDS

    The database programs are ... old. There I found the presets JV80 (which itself had already sounds D50) with the same quality same with my old JD800. But it is a matter of taste. Duplicates in different banks ROM. Here is the first time I've seen here.

    Realism varies from good to bad for some (wind instruments and electric guitars crying, pianos and strings very good). As against the widely SRX save the day.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use it less than a year.
    I was wrong machine is a sample player improved. Do not consider a sampler (the work on the samples is reduced to an absolute minimum) to really play with the sounds you turn on something else (V-Synth, Neuron), here was my mistake.

    For against excellent general keyboard.

    I'm a little hard on this machine, but it's true that overall it disappointed me.

    Strong point: the ergonomics of game a true beast live, all keys are assigned to commands, the sequencer is excellent, the arpeggiator very good and the keyboard is very correct. Thanks to him I could do without external sequencer in services.

    In short again this choice? NO!

    Or a little more recent samples (I'm not a nostalgic series U110) and especially without duplicates. A real issue of sample (but not the use of a workstation).
    See less
  • titou95titou95

    Roland Fantom X6Published on 10/21/07 at 04:14
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Good keyboard qualit.Dans all a good many are produit.Avec Varis.
    Good polyphony.
    The sounds of choirs (as on all Roland) are not worth a good horribles.Rien Korg for a.
    the pianos are good.
    Some sounds are noys in effect, unusable in a mix.
    We must attract clientle ....

    UTILIZATION

    Well here it is, I am not in agreement over other users.
    It is true that while one can save space, but then .... you end up with synths factory gas! (And even the Roland Fantom is the simplest of all)
    It is true that in the Fantom you have a box synthune rhythm, a sampler, an effects processor, and a squenceur with audio track expension a mini recorder she numrique.Mais galre.Pour activi…
    Read more
    Good keyboard qualit.Dans all a good many are produit.Avec Varis.
    Good polyphony.
    The sounds of choirs (as on all Roland) are not worth a good horribles.Rien Korg for a.
    the pianos are good.
    Some sounds are noys in effect, unusable in a mix.
    We must attract clientle ....

    UTILIZATION

    Well here it is, I am not in agreement over other users.
    It is true that while one can save space, but then .... you end up with synths factory gas! (And even the Roland Fantom is the simplest of all)
    It is true that in the Fantom you have a box synthune rhythm, a sampler, an effects processor, and a squenceur with audio track expension a mini recorder she numrique.Mais galre.Pour activitet has put everything else it takes time.
    I regret my old MC50, the VS880 in sync and my synth pack.
    This time I kept my old JD800 back, and I buy a rcement microKORG.
    M'clate and I, when I want a CRER sounds, and not much I navigate in menus and sub menus, is fast and good efficace.Mais is not seeking an opinion perso.Je m CRER me more sounds with the Fantom.C is too long.Je I use only the squenceur, and sampleur.A when a workstation with an interface of JD800? (Lol)

    SOUNDS

    The sounds like all the Roland synths are pretty good (except the vocals )....

    My style is more Jarre, Kraftwerk, Pink Floyd, Tangerine Dream, Mike Oldfield ... I have a little trouble find their mood feutre.Heureusement the JD800 and microKORG are l.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use it for 2 years.
    Premire is my workstation.
    It's a gas plant for me.
    But relative to the pattern and the triton, it is the simplest.

    Good quality price.

    I buy one of plutt MV8000, and a pack like synth era.
    And I think that's what I'll do .....
    See less