All user reviews for the Pioneer DJM-600

A rack console with 90 euros thank you Brackets pioneer.
The effects are one of the only asset of this table.
The conntiques wrong plac is economical (the RCA such a little shit is not cheap but the pro, the policy of pioneering what!)
This is not a digital console as much the prtente but a analgique with its well aggressive.

USE

Buttons eq's well spaced but quality more than doubtful, hello prices dtachs pieces ...

SONORITS

A pretty average qualiseur, a sound with the breath as we love in fashionable tables.

NOTICE GLOBAL

This table is really too expensive for my taste, all fawn is marked pioneer then everyone looking, but its still very average. The sound is more rotten than the acute agrssif the mid evil dfini while ecrass no grain, and the bass lacks dynamic and drool over, to end her and team of pr -amp too low (1V 0dB), it is obliged to pushed all in red for power attacked real pro amps, but the big problem is the famous pioneer who we call her in order: his cry, her saturates FAILURE.

I think this table is a fad, tried real tables with sound warm and round with real pramplis tried a style amix an RMC 75 or 83, it was the truth table, not the mickey table seating or flashes like a Christmas tree and it costs a fortune to the dobe.

Is rack?

Not original.

What is the type of connection (RCA Jack, XLR ...)?

RCA inputs as well as RCA and XLR master.

Before this I had a table behringer DJX 700 (big mistake!)

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is it simple?

Yes.

The manual is clear and sufficient? ...

It's going.

The usual functions are they easily accessible?

Yes

SOUNDS

The console is transparent?

Yes.

Introduces it's breath?

No.

The equalizer is effective? ...

It is great compared to the behringer has to be better but more expensive.

OVERALL OPINION

How long have you use it?

One day and already hooked!

What is so special that you love the most, least?

The more that is EQs, effects and faders that are fairly linear.

(On the behringer sound starts at 7 ...)

The less that is to be careful not to manipulate the switches of the crossfader

otherwise it cracks but you really have to run both!

Have you tried many other models before buying it?

A behringer DJX 700 a table low cost with good effects and rotten pieces

fragile!

How would you rate the quality / price?

Excellent.

With experience, you do again this choice? ...

Yes it 's on!

4 channels + 1 for the microphone.
Intgr effects some of which are synchronized
Sampler
BPM truly effective
and many other things that make this table is complte trs.

UTILIZATION

The table is clear enough despite the number of buttons. Everything is clearly visible.
Small BMOL: you can not use the sampler and the same effect in time.

SOUNDS

Plug in, turn up the sound and Listen => good prmplis, corrections that cut well (watch all the same, it is not the kills), f ki everything to make an enjoyable mix .
Not (much) of breath.
Even if I tend to say that the sound is not worth a Freevox but hey ....

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using for over a year and I do not t the one time. This table will follow me still for long adventures and I did not finish him spitting ...... Sound

Available on the manufacturer's website.

UTILIZATION

The configuration is very well and allows tudi 10 minutes to know 80% of the machine.
All functions are easy to use.
Manual Pioneer trs clear (and in French!)

SOUNDS

My dception!!

The sound saturates quickly, that ds is in the red, the sound is "ugly".
Submitted as saturation recording.
If we watch out its earnings, if all goes well.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a year but now it no longer works.
All faders are crack and change, I've never seen a price on a table that l.
Troisime the track, I did not use to beginners, only works on a ct.
The operating table is noisy, and srigraphie erased.

I used to be a possdais Smac Pro 4 fte that these four years and now works as the first day, I can not see myself buying a pioneer today especially given the price point.

A Ecler nuo5 seems to me to be a good investment (it has real faders it !!!!)

This table, I think, is for electronic music DJs (house mix I). It possde all the functions available to properly shuffled sounds. It is quite impressive and does not have standard dimensions can not be the rack.
It has four lanes (two with the boot fader) + 1 micro. The master output can be connected to XLR or RCA, no problem at trs connector is complte.

UTILIZATION

You look 5 minutes and we understand how it works, as usual with Pioneer All function are very practical to use.
The effects are indeed limited, but easy to use and trs prcis bpm counter with a nickel!
The crossfader is everything! We can assign any channel, to a sampler or anything! There is even a boot on the fader or cross fader, if the table is connected player pioneer -> practice I used quite often. All faders and the potentiomtres are trs trs flexible and enjoyable (even a little too much for the fader for my taste)
As against this feeling after a while some fragility fader buttons that remain in the hand in cracking potetiomtres, etc ...
The manual is very simple, but sometimes a little confusion on the effects section.

SOUNDS

Here the large default of this table!
The prampli is not powerful at all and ds that we arrive in the red zone is a disaster!
Effects saturate quickly as trs.
I think this table is not made for large Systm unless you have a good and a few corrections prampli derrire.
The 3-way equalizer has not cut-26dB frquence not: it is a fair bit I think ...

OVERALL OPINION

I bought this table about 6 months ago and I use about 1500W RMS.
I bought it because, first I came across a good deal (750) and Pioneer is a REFERENCE club it is better now train on the hardware that is more likely to find elsewhere.
I have not had the opportunity to try many MODELS concurents but against a lot of other tables analog.
I find the price a bit excessive even when, not easy to buy this hardware when it is special.
I think that I would no problem on my choice I turned over to an Ecler nuo5

Table very complete with lots of options "asignable sampler has all channels bpm counter effects ...) the biggest strength that I find a cot that table is its practice," can be used for all options with anything and coment "
Let me explain: the cross has 2 x 5 position (4 channels and a trim, which means nothing) they can be used with or for a sampler plate demarage only downside to this one: only 3 comparable position behringer has DJX700 which the curve by knob adjustable.

effects: they are simple adjustable c assignable to all channels including the master even in smpleur I think. the effects are quite limited, but adjustable in volume and tempo.

the sampler: user-assignable to all channels at the same master (based on loop and reloop) but not so precise but hper easy to use.

bpm counter: automatic or manual fairly precise and assignable to all channels including the master

channels: three equa-band gain more. each is switchable to phono line cd ... faders are super oux Nice and it is of 50mm and a cue button on all the tracks (you can listen 1/2/3/4 channels at the same time with the master and 5) but there is something very disappointing to me ki, labscence of kills it on cghaques ways contrary to the DJX700

the master: Amplify enough as it's always in the red (com me in a box if you can not touch the amps drive c) we regret the abscense an equa on this one

micro: his biggest weakness !!!!!! the kil + c is a 3-band equa gain. the - there is a takover manual and not automatic and most of all because no one even really boring c, there is no button on / off the microphone so if the speakers were not too far away or returns, low return to the microphone and make an awful buzzing. why should mute the microphone (if it can not because in my case) and then as I turn the gain and farewell settings.

here I think I just di, this table is really convenient and easy to use and well stocked with options (default is the biggest microphone and then the master is negligible if the rest can be set apart from the abscence of kills EVERY way)
after in life I do not answer you because I have not been able to test that canned 3 months

I put him on his cot 8 ki practice is enormous! 2 points are missing from the microphone, the master and the abscence of kills

UTILIZATION

See above ............

SOUNDS

See the top .................

OVERALL OPINION

Ke jai able to test three months so I just not speculate but I can find a CHRE when even compared to the DJX700

I bought this table there is a little over a year, an APRS DJX700 c'tait a treat, many APRS urilisations (in a rack and the care its good ncessaire maintenance) is like new, but a little consideration APRS further qund I think even that much of the price of the brand, a bit of crosstalk and pramplis a little weak, it is used on a table together Yamaha 01V96 Powerfoft amplification and dissemination Nexo and everything goes pretty well.

If c'tait again given the number of club teams of the table, I think I let myself try again
DJ Merlin

UTILIZATION

I bought this table there is a little over a year, an APRS DJX700 c'tait a treat, many APRS urilisations (in a rack and the care its good ncessaire maintenance) is like new, but a little consideration APRS further qund I think even that much of the price of the brand, a bit of crosstalk and pramplis a little weak, it is used on a table together Yamaha 01V96 Powerfoft amplification and dissemination Nexo and everything goes pretty well.

If c'tait again given the number of club teams of the table, I think I let myself try again
DJ Merlin

SOUNDS

I bought this table there is a little over a year, an APRS DJX700 c'tait a treat, many APRS urilisations (in a rack and the care its good ncessaire maintenance) is like new, but a little consideration APRS further qund I think even that much of the price of the brand, a bit of crosstalk and pramplis a little weak, it is used on a table together Yamaha 01V96 Powerfoft amplification and dissemination Nexo and everything goes pretty well.

If c'tait again given the number of club teams of the table, I think I let myself try again
DJ Merlin

OVERALL OPINION

I bought this table there is a little over a year, an APRS DJX700 c'tait a treat, many APRS urilisations (in a rack and the care its good ncessaire maintenance) is like new, but a little consideration APRS further qund I think even that much of the price of the brand, a bit of crosstalk and pramplis a little weak, it is used on a table together Yamaha 01V96 Powerfoft amplification and dissemination Nexo and everything goes pretty well.

If c'tait again given the number of club teams of the table, I think I let myself try again
DJ Merlin

See www.pionneer.com

UTILIZATION

In terms of ergonomics the table is very well Designed. All functions graves under the fingers, a c references. (Proof copy Behring) A default: button talkover trs has misplaced mutes Manir trsdsagrable if not careful.
I use it every night or almost discothque and has been for some years ... I like the table at the back, once I hated .. The EQ bdeeaoup are not too powerful and musical, faders "ON / OFF" of faders have the name. require mixing with gain, many are like me ... Since it is everywhere, I had to put myself and I've do .. the effects are fun set we can do great things with the little one is the technique .. (See dave clarke, we take a yard).
the sampler is well done, sound is good.
prfr we would call a forcment LFO to the tempo of the filter that sounds a lot elsewhere.

SOUNDS

The Pioneer sound, dplorable ... the sound is boom boom, bang a drive is it's not really musical or transparent.
The EQ is too stiff ..
The effects are not bad, too bad the call filter is the tempo. The flanger is disappointing and we get tired quickly.

OVERALL OPINION

The EQ button is HS after three years, ditto for the faders. small button selectors tempo effect SOTN inoprants quickly too. It trs old evil. I have seen 600 "spit" 2x less than 3 years after its use as a new one. (Especially not a table purchase)

So for a mobile disco that table is perfect .. EQ / fader match that use. Also perfect for DJ work gnraliste. to mix hiphop trs bof for the funk is doing well.
To mix of house / techno to progressive Manir ... buy something else. is made if you knock hard techno and you send the disks quickly trs ...

See below

UTILIZATION

Even lower

SOUNDS

Just below

OVERALL OPINION

For me I think this table is one of the best mixer on marchbr /> is rack and a small effect section is place for beginners because, in case of problems an effect too quickly hide The biggest problem (attention all the same it is not something to do with accessory)
advice after having several dj who recommend me this one
I invested 1259 euro (a vassal) to buy and I have no regrets because it's been almost a year she suffered the worst things with faders and it does not crack! not even a small crack jack or from time to time

before making this choice you see in the item or brand Ecler Rodec because for my part and that of many club discotheque, these three brands are often taken as a material of good

Lio

Rackable if the achte Querre to put in 19 inches. 4 channels + 1 slice micro music, dpart and effects return, FX +
sampler board, everything is l.
Connectivity is standard: RCA, XLR symtrique for the master and jack for dpart and effects return.

UTILIZATION

She is super ergonomic, and functions well places. The party effect is very simple to use, even for the sampler.

SOUNDS

Unlike what many people might think (as eg the "technical professionals" who install the hardware in the club), the DJM 600 mixer is not numrique. It is well and truly an analogue desk. Only the section of the multi-purpose device that is ...
I think it sounds pretty good overall but not a to be extraordinary. Unlike others, I find the RIAA pramplis of good quality and quite powerful. Moreover, when I mix, the gains are ways phono gnral at the same level as the CD tracks. EQs are no more, especially that of serious cuts -26 db of course, but that enlve some low-medium passing ... The correction of the medium is not great I prfre calibrated frequency drives tape a little higher and a bit wider. It remains nanmoins correct. A BMOL also for the channel fader rising quickly: I think they have more than one race linear logarithmic. This means that a repre means good dj sound, and between 6 and 10 the increase is not obvious.
The multi-effects sound good trs my taste. The sampler also (16 bits/44, 1 kHz). For cons, the reverb is not the cleanest. It is not the goal either. We will not ask for a lexicon of a DJ table ... The filter is good, but I AIM to choose between manual or with the LFO section tempo.La insertion and return effect is very well too, especially with the track or slecteur the master. The slecteur for croos-fader curve is very well think so too. Also note a section of pr-cost trs complte with balance between the channels and the master.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it since its release on the market. But I have to buy two. For you must know it's a good table, but also fragile, trs. after a year ago on the knobs of the game Hi-Mid-Bass, small buttons to calibrate the FX in tempos that rpondent more. I prfre on the table: the multi-effect, the VU meters on each channel. You should know that no product is perfect. AIM I shuffled a sound and robust to a MAC or SCLATER home Ecler, cot and Technology Pioneer.
I plan to buy me the ending for DJM 800 coming next month on the market that it is really numrique ...

Mixer with digital effects of good qualities I advise the eco set to 7 is the top, but it's not the best.

UTILIZATION

This table is a marvel of Japanese technology for a faster style of mix in the movements of hands, but right now it vintage!

SOUNDS

For the Son does not push in the red with a sound system if it breaks the ears adjust the master A 5, and do not increase too, with adjustable table is very responsive, but it is not good ecstasy since I tested a vestax pmc500 I said that the pioneer is a bit of stew

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using with my 2003 technics is a very good restaurant to learn the mix

See manufacturer's website.

UTILIZATION

The configuration is relatively simple for you may have used tables mix, otherwise the instructions are clear enough to make up for any query. All the usual functions are easily accessibles.Pour me I had no problem handling.

SOUNDS

I did not feel out of breath, and the sound is very good even if it is individual (the bass is less noticeable than on other models) and équalizeur from rising up to 12 db, but very effective cut.

OVERALL OPINION

1 month

Look very nice, fairly long course of faders, in fact I like everything in the mixer (except the lack of bass).

I worked with the Power (yes, it does not younger) and Berhinger.

Excellent value for money (I got it new for less than € 900) and I think I would do the same choice again. However, I will wait to see what it gives to use and if the problem I will give an opinion.

Personal I had no prolem its the contrary I have a good quality sound ...
Remarc ...
As against this, see that it's not a mixer for the scratch ...
Really disappointed on this point ...

UTILIZATION

The cross is very long, despite some settings that can still not great ...
As well as it's been long since I touch are not from the home studio ... I thought why not take a good break beats and have fun this ...
After half an hour, big black mark on my fingers ...

SOUNDS

That's why he is the silver (which leaves no trace on the fingers) ct a joke for what they do not understand!
Designed for the club or clubs but not a scratch intesa ...

OVERALL OPINION

Is it possible to accentuate the sharpness of the cut?

Mixer Rack, both in the original 19 inches against the price brackets ... in the 50 but hey when achte a table of this award, we know what to expect!
I will not remember the number of lanes, I do not think there have DIFFERENT MODELS of the DJM 600 lol

The effects are trs well, even great! including the transformation of the voice with the micro Pitch effect, to bring a little atmosphere in the room!
However, when the treble pots, mid and low focus, there is a tendency to have too much treble, but it also dpend music.

UTILIZATION

Use could not be more simple and enjoyable, especially for mix electro / hard or faders are requested trs ... trs flexible.

with respect to the manual, you must have a vocabulary of sound but still with the rflexion ...

SOUNDS

So the great sound! before j'tais with BST Activ 206, and the sound changed dramatically! but what incredible sharpness c ... it is also necessary for the amplifier and sound processor that go .. but frankly hat.

on his headphone, trs good you just daugmenter Gain for more sound in the headphones ... everyone apparently did not understand!

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 7 months no problem!
I love everything about this mixer but two small points ...
- The talk-over is not automatic
- A bit too sharp but ca default is easily RULES

quality price ratio ... honnte Pioneer trs is expensive and will always be expensive, but compared to Numark, Gemini, ... y'as no photo!

later, the CDJ j'achte! without hsitations

Hello everyone well I'll speak to beginners who may not understand all the baths "pro"

in a few sentences the djm 600:

is a very good mixer (admittedly very expensive) but we go well lol not really effect his Alucine her and very easy to use and really makes it a very good sound quality! It can record a part of music for 8 sec ...
to start with the cross must be connected with the table of platinum cd pioneer. output sound through the headphones is really good and powerful! in short it really nice and easy to use too need the manual except for the table really approfondire

So its a pretty high price its the least of the table

effects stylish 12 or 13 in total with the settings every time we made ourselves to change the pace! BPM counter and reliable. er me on mine I have no breath of all cons but I confess when it goes red c true that it's hard to get a quality worthy of Pioneer!
So a system requirements is to have a real amp and an equalizer behind!

the cross are flexible there's no problem!
in short it is a wonder I have for three weeks and really I do not regret the 800 € (new)

UTILIZATION

Gfbf

SOUNDS

Gfb

OVERALL OPINION

Gbf

- Is the rack? Yes
- How many lanes, bus attendant, departures, returns ...)? 4 + 1 master tracks
- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)? RCA, XLR and Jack
- The parametric equalizer is it? Not
- The effects section is it integrated? ... Yes

UTILIZATION

The general configuration-is it simple? yes very easy
- The usual functions are they easily accessible? yes
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ... not read but it is not used unless you want to push down capabilities

SOUNDS

- Introduced she breath? I is not heard in person
- The equalizer is effective? ... very effective

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it? I was not but I have THE USER
- What is so special that you like most and least?
Most:
Design
effects
Dual BPM Counter
the button effects, cool to the touch but hey it's not something super important, but the feel good ^ ^
Faders, solid and well slide
the specific equalizers
the potentiometer
The selection effects that are indicated on the table in contrast to the DJX 700

The -:
Price
Potentiometers that are not made of rubber (I'm looking a little silly Little Miss)

- Have you tried many other models before buying it? I have not but I tried the DJM 800 / Synq SMX-2 / Behringer DJX 700
- How would you rate the quality / price? Exellent dommae that the price is a bit Exess
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
If I spend two turntables + Vinyl CD I would take not much to the table a bit and have 800 + but I would have no choice, this table is an exellent choice but good because I'm just on CD for the moment I m orient more on the DJM 400

DJM600

UTILIZATION

PIONEER's simply a near-perfect ergonomics, everything is at hand, and the effects do not need 36-key combinations or menu to be adjusted to live.

by lctronique is against the mdiocre, as the indoor lowcost. Of breath, hum, noise switching, transfer of sound in the bus even though everything is 0 .... poor control of common mode filtering ... as well as the effect would have multi MRIT in some self SERIES on power.
SERIES condos in the audio are chemical, hello phase shift, the raisin bread are X7R, bad audio on the cause of the piezo effect, in short, the economy everywhere, yet it sold quite expensive, you pay the brand, once again from PIONEER.
it is on that kk that the DJ plays one night a boom or a background in their den on a hi-fi 50W, they will find a good (especially that there labeled Pioneer above), on the other hand in studio, radio or ds that the search of his claret with a lot of watts, is a drip pan. Fortunately, in the nightclub noise is such that a default cover.

you can not use the effects and sampler independently.

another point of criticism is the microphone 2, which requires a PHONO monopolize. Not practical in a battle with MC:
starts and use the forces in place the CD 1 and 2, and TD 3 and 4, except that the auxiliary microphone can be assigned that channel 4! (I have a Denon, and when you taste from the matrix, it is difficult with other ....).

SOUNDS

the console is virtually transparent, the sound is a little color but not too much. It's not dsagrable, but lack of dynamics.
The equalizer that climb 12 dB is nothing. the-26dB is a little lightweight when it made war the numbers, but in the end it's enough, I have never shown a sense "crap has not cut enough."
Besides the breath I think too much, I think without compressor derrire we not do much, if not peter amps.
good range of output, ideal for modulating compressors to give his "club", the inconvnient is that all the time in the red and has not let too many reserve (especially for effects).
multi effect Intgr is good quality.

I put a 6 which is just, the compartment or the DENON ECLER DJ to stay in range, the DJM 600 is more than average.
Denon course there are circuits ANALOG DEVICES, BURR BROWN, TEXAS, PANASONIC ..... which is not the case that the PIONEER taking low-end or waffers virtually obsolete.

OVERALL OPINION

the notice is a mixed console trs average, which catches all is the use and strong because it must be said ergonomics is perfect (both available in the use effects), and chassis rigidity gives any evidence.

console perfect bar and club, but avoid the studio if you search for perfection.
for observing a RELOOP RMX40 I not ashamed to say that is better RELOOP Designed (apart from the fact that my taste is a little behind the Pioneer).

what I owned before (and always for sure):

- OMNITRONIC PM 640 (best quality price, my first mixer, it lasts 7 years!).
- BEHRINGER DJX 700 (my biggest mistake).
- CHESLEY Equinox (the box, though).
- Denon DNX 1500 (trs sound good, but I can almost unlimited deprecated for the live mix).

given the fact that I use (mix live) I would do this choice, or wait a little longer to see if the RELOOP go the distance (which seems to be the case), since half the price of a DJM600 can be a good deal.
I would do this also because the choice is easy and resale without losing too much money.

The characteristics and performance are average (see below and in the other post on the subject of the components)

UTILIZATION

The setup is nice, it's the highlight of the console except some points carément unacceptable.
In the super ago: Ergonomics, possibilities and effects commands, bpm double if necessary (it can work with CDJ 100 that are inexpensive and well used), relative strength, and fader operation and ease of crosfader dedicated controls the position and size of controls, ease of mix and opportunities, working comfort, the headphones and controls PFL, the meters that help clear the fluid mix well ... I certainly forget
In the medium means there are: the master output fader and we can hang straight (Grr, it m'arive almost every evening ...), which is not very precise. The low number of entries online.
In the bad: second mic unusable (not practice it requires cutting a stereo channel, its pathetic ...), not cross main mic and trimmings limited active crossfader on two channels at once what does not really a four-way effect. This last point is really annoying 2cd + configuration interface two channels, we all have a computer in today. For the last CD input for a misplaced extension microphone or another (it is more practical on a DJM 400)

SOUNDS

Not so transparent breath.
EQ well
Acceptable sound at medium volume, but once you turn up the sound becomes dry and poor draft. We joined forces with an external EQ, it is sometimes confused with a big sound system. If the sound is low-end, do not have ears hard. With good sound that goes into working a little overboard. What I say is related to the extent it is still not his "bottom line" is still above average. Still, for example, DENON DNX 500 Genre I like better and seems more "musical" (I tested blind EQ 0). Sound from the microphone means and the second micro carément below the average ... Help!
To suggest a function as void to be done. I understand why I saw some DJ unplug them to plug their main mike HF example for a presentation. But hey, this is not the main function of a DJ table ...

OVERALL OPINION

What I like most about it is the use and overall capabilities. Adapting to different styles make it a platform universally appreciated (see above). For my part, CDJ100S use with Denon 4500 and things are going well. The caretaking work reliably and efficiently is limited and this is my occasional use. About 1000 Euros plus two Mix cdj 100, interface board and fly Denon. (Not counting the computer) ...
I am extremely disappointed cons of other points that I find unworthy of a camera in this class (see above). Smooth the mix is ​​good but when it is necessary to facilitate or simply to be heard is not great sometimes annoying (see various issues of micro and I do not talk over you ...)... Anyway, this function is disturbing, and requires little concentration: we happen to another table better equipped in this respect. Using open mic permanently requires the use of a very good style Shure microphone. The weight and handling of the hose will not fail to kill very quickly input jack on the front.
Value for money carément exaggerated hand, there has seen the price of ads. They are often (very) old and all are sold "as new". At 500 euros opportunity, if we compare with a DJM700 for little more, the sound is better and the device is guaranteed. Between 300 and 400 seems a more acceptable price.
on the other hand, its universality that the store "local" know them and can fix or renovate for low prices. A council, think about ventilation Authorities closed, it heats a lot! Given the state of those sent in for repair, I think it must improve its reliability over time ...
Tried other brands? Yes, some (see my other post). With the experience: there's more in other brands, (there is also much worse) you win the microphones and sound, but you lose the starts, or effects, or both ...
At Pioneer, the 800 seems much better and there are 4 starts but it will be still some way off given the price of nine. The 700 remains as competitive with better sound and some small ergonomic flaws corrected.
I've tested and used more (DJM600) many were bad ... . It is nevertheless a good tool.
on the other hand for a first purchase or for the mobile disco, I strongly recommend. Better to buy an equivalent budjet Denon nine if we use some effects (DNX 1100 or 500) or DJM 400 second-hand property in two ways, offers more options and configurations with a reduced size. Repeat this choice? No, I changed to a 400 eventually.