Pioneer DJM-900NXS

Possibility of racker me she is in a stall fly perfectly when it comes to transport.
It includes all the basic connectivity Djm 800, but I find more orderly. The microphone input 2 is found behind more input RJ45 joins the table to communicate with the network turntables and a usb connection on top connected to pc with Abelton or other ... The only downside is that there are more than two phono inputs on channel 1 and 4.
A high quality sound with 96kHz sampling, an A / D converter and 24-bit D / A Converter 32bit.
2 boxes with 6 different effects and color fx beat better effect with more effects including a new table that the x-pad with some nice effects.

UTILIZATION

Configuration is clean, simple, homogeneous functions with easy use. Everything is done for the dj feel good.
Manual very descriptive and full despite not having special needs.

SOUNDS

EQ efficient with a button that isolated, hear nothing when (HI, MID, LOW) are at -26.
No breath.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for almost 2 years now.
Before I had to use the djm 700 and 800 but now it changed a lot especially with rekordbox and quantize function.
The feature I like most is the new effects on the color and quality of the fx fader. Least, maybe a screen too small and having entered a RJ45 network for all mètrent therefore require to have a ethernet router in addition with respect to the djm 2000 or one connects all above.
Pioneer continues to lead quality is nothing to say but can expensive anyway.

I would do this choice with your eyes closed.

I would not go back on all that are found everywhere.
It is very comprehensive, it does not lack much ...
The DJM embeds a high quality sound card to enter and exit a computer with Traktor.

UTILIZATION

The expertise of Pioneer ergonomics!

Since the beginning of the DJM were imposed in the club.
The Nexus 900 brought to the table a very successful.

Whether the faders, cross the sound color FX 6 (excellent), and the box indeed very full.
The band touch the needle search is very effective in live.

I like the type setting talk over the mic's switch with LED is correct, even if the fader was top.

The big plus of this table is the connection network with Rekordbox and CDJ 2000 to synchronize real-time tempo read on Rekordbox (quantize).
The preview of the CUE track computer Rekordbox is appreciable in the evening to cue a track without sending a CDJ.

SOUNDS

Used with a front head and RCF sub, the DJM 900 does not equal or tenors AMIX RODEC but has caught the delay on this. The sound is clear, powerful and detailed. Nothing to say.

OVERALL OPINION

Combined with the CDJ 2000 with Rekordbox is the ultimate DJ governed in my eyes.
Unfortunately, overpriced, but when you love .....

The console retains the format of its big sister (the DJM800) provided to unscrew the pretty cover on the front.
Settings BASS / MED / CUT FEVER now offer a useful on some styles.
The synchronization of effects makes them "finally" usable. On a personal DJM800, I do not hardly ever used. By synchronizing the result is much better ... it sounds much better.
Dialogue with the CDJ2000 is not bad, I did not like the white lights that clignotées end pieces, it m'éboulissait ... now in red, they bother me less.

UTILIZATION

Like any DJM in 5 minutes we are ready to make an evening ... for the effects, it is more practical course. But it is also the goal of having a toy on which to spend a few hours to master.
All features are accessible and useful, but I wish the meters more responsive. Dificil to wedge a piece with the table without a headphone, though I arrived very well with my previous table.
I will connect to the PC (Rekordbox) this weekend, I would complete.

SOUNDS

Very big plus compared to previous generations. The digital audio sound finally I find the sound less than a round table analog, but it must be admitted that the sound output is very good and remains good when you push hard!
Equalizers are very effective and play their role perfectly.
As against some effects are either too high or too low ... it's a shame (can be corrected by firmware)

OVERALL OPINION

I have this table for 10 days now.
I had a lot of tables in the hands for 20 years: Freevox DJ7, Soundcraft DMix1000, X1500 Denon, Ecler EVO4, Pioneer DJM500/700/800/1000.

What I like
- The sound quality at high volume
- The synchronization effects
- Color management trays of CDJ 2000

Cons:
- The proposed filter effect: far from the quality of analog filters in my previous table. The apps are better, it's serious at this price.
- The headphone mix based on the output level after the Gain control.

As I have done a very good deal, I would do this choice without hesitation. I have long hesitated between a DJM800 DJM900 ... There's no picture! if you have CDJ900 or 2000 ... The DJM 900 is for you!