All user reviews for the Behringer Eurodesk SL3242FX-PRO

Is Rack? Not
- How many lanes, bus attendant, departures, returns ...)? 24 mono + 4 stereo channels, 2 to dep
2 multi integrated.

- The parametric equalizer is it? yes

- The effects section is it integrated? yes

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is it simple? child's play

- The usual functions are they easily accessible? Very easy to access, even if it lacks a bit of room for those with big fingers!

- The manual is clear and sufficient? No need for manual use is so simple, but clear manual if you want to look into it! (Like all the behringer manual!)

SOUNDS

-The console is transparent?

The preamps seem correct, but the slices egualisation I find fishing a little compared to my old console! (An inter M)

- Introduced she breath? Found not breathing (if we rule out the pfl of each slice has 0dB)

- The equalizer is effective? See my answer above but I would add just that for the price of the console it works very well already!

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it? For two weeks (2 hours per day and 5 hours a week end!)

- What is so special that you like most and least? What I like most are the pssibilitées routing and easier to use. what I like least is the EQ of each slice (especially in the mids) that fish a little

- Have you tried many other models before buying it? Not the masses: an inter samson and M

- How would you rate the quality / price?
Excellent than those without masses of tunes do not hesitate ...

- With experience, you do again this choice? Remaining within the same budget I would go back with eyes closed!

Hello,

not the table since it is not rack a meter in length!
XLR mic connectors in / (out for the master) and Jack in line / jack out (master, insert, root control, to send)
2 effects section
medium semi-parametric

UTILIZATION

Config general no more complicated than another table, hard to navigate with 32 entries
The usual functions are very accessible.
The manual is clear as crystal.

SOUNDS

The preamps are too crystalline c a little cold
not too many breath except gain a background (a little more than my alesis 16 Fw)
The equalizer leaves something to be desired especially against the media.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 3 months and I'm happy
most: price, look, sound overall strength, number of lanes, routing
Cons: weight, height, preamp a little cold (but for that price should not ask for the moon)

enormous value for price!

with the same means I would do this choice. otherwise I would turn into a Yamaha 02R.

To avoid any emergency, I am my 3rd fx 3242 for 3 years, not counting the one before that the 3242 silent mx.
3 failures indantiques the cot law goes into distortion, yet the table does not come out, it always remains in place, so no manipulation inadquate.
on the other hand, if the hardware does not work well trs, warranty work perfectly.

UTILIZATION

To avoid any emergency, I am my 3rd fx 3242 for 3 years, not counting the one before that the 3242 silent mx.
3 failures indantiques the cot law goes into distortion, yet the table does not come out, it always remains in place, so no manipulation inadquate.
on the other hand, if the hardware does not work well trs, warranty work perfectly.

SOUNDS

To avoid any emergency, I am my 3rd fx 3242 for 3 years, not counting the one before that the 3242 silent mx.
3 failures indantiques the cot law goes into distortion, yet the table does not come out, it always remains in place, so no manipulation inadquate.
on the other hand, if the hardware does not work well trs, warranty work perfectly.

OVERALL OPINION

To avoid any emergency, I am my 3rd fx 3242 for 3 years, not counting the one before that the 3242 silent mx.
3 failures indantiques the cot law goes into distortion, yet the table does not come out, it always remains in place, so no manipulation inadquate.
on the other hand, if the hardware does not work well trs, warranty work perfectly.

Table not rack, 89 cm in length. prcis not on the record!
24 mono channels, 4 stereo
RCA, XLR and jack, all there!
Paramtrique equalizer output mix.
2 multi effects Intgr, type virtualizeur pro.

UTILIZATION

Table very easy to understand, the manual is well done and some examples of use are the intrieru the booklet.
The potentiomtres of rglages are small, attention to fat fingers! faders are short and fast accdent the critical threshold. You get used.

SOUNDS

Console transparent, see-neutral return (if the lese rglages in 12 hours). The advantage of pramplifier few entries with other System.
Breath ...? as on all consoles, ds as you go up too much pramplis or output monitor headphones or prampli. These are rglages test. But the breath rsiduel not reflected on the main output, up to 0 db.
Equalizer fictitious. it is to the beautiful with the little LED light.

OVERALL OPINION

Well, just as things srieuses, tests rels of this console in terms of routing and audio. At first sight, this table Submitted good. Robust, well finished with a touch of gray mtalise nice for the eyes and the sight of the dusts too! In dpart, I was looking for a console with a large capacity routing of pramplis correct around 1000 euros. Trying this SL32, I found a copy of neutrality of pramplis! posssseurs of pramplis prsonus, I have no worries will integrate the inputs of the BTE to customize a little. Done, my rglages are clear and transparent. Dbx compressor on an insert, and you have a console trs trs interresting rendering. You will say, "Yes, but the console only sounds she well?" . Rponse: It is neutral, the rglages of qualisation are correct (except low mdium, inefficient). I found no breath rsiduel as many think in Bringher. If we test all consoles with pramplis back then blow all the consoles! Used in home studio for commercial projects, I uses this console, not to give an identity sound my projects, but station routing of 32 votes. I advise those who possdent some dj stuff (pramplis, effects and compressors) The neutrality of the console ensure that you can use it with anything. It restores what he sends without PForm. 600 for current costs, I do not think you find better. A Mackie 16 channel ...? I have one and it's good hearts hearts. The diffrence is measurable but not audible. The most interesting, that is the wallet and your exact obtained. If your mix is ​​correct, Eng mastering will finalize your product.

The pros: 32 routes, routing complete neutrality, little or no wind, effects Intgr (n11 effect, suitable for percu mix for example), consumption 50W, ergonomics, 4 sub, a direct output by way of insert I / O (in a jack insrant half), the price.

The -: 9-band equalizer output, connections to the top of the console, just potentiomtres prs each other, too low mdium lightweight, power intgre.

Conclusion: Small budgets, Do not hesitate, this console is a good investment. For owners of quality hardware (pramplis, effects and compressors) looking for a console, why not? The sound is quite usable for a mix of quality. The purse is the main enemy of the musician or not. For 600, made of economy and use this console eyes closed.

The + (in this price range)
- Trs important routing capabilities (eg thanks to the inserts in L / R, and thanks to the # of units, including two stro Galise on 4, which allows to optimize, fx and s / g, o thanks to the mono output filterable 30 400 Hz 18 dB / oct, or sending thanks to the 2 fx 1 & 2. ..)
- Full monitoring trs
- Micro orders Intgr (uniqt to the 1 & 2)
- 9 equalizer channels L / R-detection Feedback (routable on the 1)
- Fx processor Intgr dbrayable (for the 3 & 4 suppl) ...

The big + (compared its capabilities)
- Light weight and small dimensions (very practical in a bar).

UTILIZATION

The +: config ultra-simple and "friendly".

Small -
- 48 VDC power supply fantme gnrale (logical, considering the price of bousin)
- Connectivity "jack" in prdominante routing (logical, given the dimen bousin)
- High tp inquitante some of the power supply intgre (Obviously has sub slices out) but without any pb recens 2 years (3 hrs min / week in RPET with heavy smokers and heavy sweating + 20aine a big concert).

SOUNDS

By using "live"

Most
- Good transparency (no heat nor then, but no "mtallisation" perceptible sound, no noticeable distortion)
- Breath of harmless little Systmes (4 kW for my part) until 42 dB between pramp MIC (1 grad = 6 dB), threshold more than ample for a good dynamic mic (without talk about good static), and really audible above 6 dB Output L / R (17 slices with active RULES for me between 18 db and 36 dB between and around 0 dB output, and one hand below 6 db) so in my case, above the maximum level of use
- The cashing pramp easily good signal levels without distorting the least (MIC tests: NT 3, KMS 105, Opus 87, C420, C418, Beta 87, SM 87, N/D767 etc.)..

Small - (small because redundant functions perfectly in my case)
- Equalizer L / R completely rude and ineffective (or even dangerous for HP and eardrums in a search for Feedback), besides its CHARACTERISTICS Retailer are not even r list it in the manual ...
- Fx Intgr Ingala effective and widely configurable enough (for me, just uses BPS Hall reverb on vocals)

THE - (especially if microphones or trs means of his "extreme" source)
- Legalization per honnte enough but not great (+ / -15 dB, really?) Especially for the only ONE prsence mdium parameter, and indeed the slope of the legalization of remaining unknown, even to looking attentivt the record.
In all cases, the gal a precision slice possde quite small.

OVERALL OPINION

Rgulirement so I use the machine for 2 years, but no industrial Manir.
on the other hand, my conditions are pretty hard (wet nicotine frquents transport, ...)

J'aime bcp
- Its weight and dimensions ridiculous (for the 32 tracks)
- The # of slices (useful for background music groups)
- Routing capabilities for the "little live"
- A ridiculous price (compared its capabilities and performance).

I quite like: transparency, provided possder transducers good quality (at least grate history of the legalization of slices).

I like a little: its Intgr fx (RPET practice or in bar, for a modest rverb).

I do not like: the equalizer gnral (do not forget to disable, especially) can of research with Feedback (in addition to nine slices, good luck for precision ...)

Note: I often including dj Soundcraft test (ana), Yamaha 01 and 02V (num), Midas (ana) and Mackie (ana). Yes it's better, empty (although the Yam 01V ...).

Added 22/05/2008 (then a year later): tjr happy with this machine, despite several hours of weekly used (rpt or concerts / bars). Tjr and not seen or heard better, the price NINE. In fact, it will forcment best APRS deep cleaning ... MEN / / with one of my MACKIE.

Added 21/01/2010: nothing wrong. Still in service after nearly five years, even if using less frquemment (duplication), and still no points.