View other reviews for this product:
lechauve
Published on 05/22/08 at 13:05
The + (in this price range)
- Trs important routing capabilities (eg thanks to the inserts in L / R, and thanks to the # of units, including two stro Galise on 4, which allows to optimize, fx and s / g, o thanks to the mono output filterable 30 400 Hz 18 dB / oct, or sending thanks to the 2 fx 1 & 2. ..)
- Full monitoring trs
- Micro orders Intgr (uniqt to the 1 & 2)
- 9 equalizer channels L / R-detection Feedback (routable on the 1)
- Fx processor Intgr dbrayable (for the 3 & 4 suppl) ...
The big + (compared its capabilities)
- Light weight and small dimensions (very practical in a bar).
UTILIZATION
The +: config ultra-simple and "friendly".
Small -
- 48 VDC power supply fantme gnrale (logical, considering the price of bousin)
- Connectivity "jack" in prdominante routing (logical, given the dimen bousin)
- High tp inquitante some of the power supply intgre (Obviously has sub slices out) but without any pb recens 2 years (3 hrs min / week in RPET with heavy smokers and heavy sweating + 20aine a big concert).
SOUNDS
By using "live"
Most
- Good transparency (no heat nor then, but no "mtallisation" perceptible sound, no noticeable distortion)
- Breath of harmless little Systmes (4 kW for my part) until 42 dB between pramp MIC (1 grad = 6 dB), threshold more than ample for a good dynamic mic (without talk about good static), and really audible above 6 dB Output L / R (17 slices with active RULES for me between 18 db and 36 dB between and around 0 dB output, and one hand below 6 db) so in my case, above the maximum level of use
- The cashing pramp easily good signal levels without distorting the least (MIC tests: NT 3, KMS 105, Opus 87, C420, C418, Beta 87, SM 87, N/D767 etc.)..
Small - (small because redundant functions perfectly in my case)
- Equalizer L / R completely rude and ineffective (or even dangerous for HP and eardrums in a search for Feedback), besides its CHARACTERISTICS Retailer are not even r list it in the manual ...
- Fx Intgr Ingala effective and widely configurable enough (for me, just uses BPS Hall reverb on vocals)
THE - (especially if microphones or trs means of his "extreme" source)
- Legalization per honnte enough but not great (+ / -15 dB, really?) Especially for the only ONE prsence mdium parameter, and indeed the slope of the legalization of remaining unknown, even to looking attentivt the record.
In all cases, the gal a precision slice possde quite small.
OVERALL OPINION
Rgulirement so I use the machine for 2 years, but no industrial Manir.
on the other hand, my conditions are pretty hard (wet nicotine frquents transport, ...)
J'aime bcp
- Its weight and dimensions ridiculous (for the 32 tracks)
- The # of slices (useful for background music groups)
- Routing capabilities for the "little live"
- A ridiculous price (compared its capabilities and performance).
I quite like: transparency, provided possder transducers good quality (at least grate history of the legalization of slices).
I like a little: its Intgr fx (RPET practice or in bar, for a modest rverb).
I do not like: the equalizer gnral (do not forget to disable, especially) can of research with Feedback (in addition to nine slices, good luck for precision ...)
Note: I often including dj Soundcraft test (ana), Yamaha 01 and 02V (num), Midas (ana) and Mackie (ana). Yes it's better, empty (although the Yam 01V ...).
Added 22/05/2008 (then a year later): tjr happy with this machine, despite several hours of weekly used (rpt or concerts / bars). Tjr and not seen or heard better, the price NINE. In fact, it will forcment best APRS deep cleaning ... MEN / / with one of my MACKIE.
Added 21/01/2010: nothing wrong. Still in service after nearly five years, even if using less frquemment (duplication), and still no points.
- Trs important routing capabilities (eg thanks to the inserts in L / R, and thanks to the # of units, including two stro Galise on 4, which allows to optimize, fx and s / g, o thanks to the mono output filterable 30 400 Hz 18 dB / oct, or sending thanks to the 2 fx 1 & 2. ..)
- Full monitoring trs
- Micro orders Intgr (uniqt to the 1 & 2)
- 9 equalizer channels L / R-detection Feedback (routable on the 1)
- Fx processor Intgr dbrayable (for the 3 & 4 suppl) ...
The big + (compared its capabilities)
- Light weight and small dimensions (very practical in a bar).
UTILIZATION
The +: config ultra-simple and "friendly".
Small -
- 48 VDC power supply fantme gnrale (logical, considering the price of bousin)
- Connectivity "jack" in prdominante routing (logical, given the dimen bousin)
- High tp inquitante some of the power supply intgre (Obviously has sub slices out) but without any pb recens 2 years (3 hrs min / week in RPET with heavy smokers and heavy sweating + 20aine a big concert).
SOUNDS
By using "live"
Most
- Good transparency (no heat nor then, but no "mtallisation" perceptible sound, no noticeable distortion)
- Breath of harmless little Systmes (4 kW for my part) until 42 dB between pramp MIC (1 grad = 6 dB), threshold more than ample for a good dynamic mic (without talk about good static), and really audible above 6 dB Output L / R (17 slices with active RULES for me between 18 db and 36 dB between and around 0 dB output, and one hand below 6 db) so in my case, above the maximum level of use
- The cashing pramp easily good signal levels without distorting the least (MIC tests: NT 3, KMS 105, Opus 87, C420, C418, Beta 87, SM 87, N/D767 etc.)..
Small - (small because redundant functions perfectly in my case)
- Equalizer L / R completely rude and ineffective (or even dangerous for HP and eardrums in a search for Feedback), besides its CHARACTERISTICS Retailer are not even r list it in the manual ...
- Fx Intgr Ingala effective and widely configurable enough (for me, just uses BPS Hall reverb on vocals)
THE - (especially if microphones or trs means of his "extreme" source)
- Legalization per honnte enough but not great (+ / -15 dB, really?) Especially for the only ONE prsence mdium parameter, and indeed the slope of the legalization of remaining unknown, even to looking attentivt the record.
In all cases, the gal a precision slice possde quite small.
OVERALL OPINION
Rgulirement so I use the machine for 2 years, but no industrial Manir.
on the other hand, my conditions are pretty hard (wet nicotine frquents transport, ...)
J'aime bcp
- Its weight and dimensions ridiculous (for the 32 tracks)
- The # of slices (useful for background music groups)
- Routing capabilities for the "little live"
- A ridiculous price (compared its capabilities and performance).
I quite like: transparency, provided possder transducers good quality (at least grate history of the legalization of slices).
I like a little: its Intgr fx (RPET practice or in bar, for a modest rverb).
I do not like: the equalizer gnral (do not forget to disable, especially) can of research with Feedback (in addition to nine slices, good luck for precision ...)
Note: I often including dj Soundcraft test (ana), Yamaha 01 and 02V (num), Midas (ana) and Mackie (ana). Yes it's better, empty (although the Yam 01V ...).
Added 22/05/2008 (then a year later): tjr happy with this machine, despite several hours of weekly used (rpt or concerts / bars). Tjr and not seen or heard better, the price NINE. In fact, it will forcment best APRS deep cleaning ... MEN / / with one of my MACKIE.
Added 21/01/2010: nothing wrong. Still in service after nearly five years, even if using less frquemment (duplication), and still no points.