MT8X classified ad
Alerte nouvelle annonceImages
Reviews
4.3/5(4 reviews)
25 %
75 %
Write a user review
rouldugPublished on 10/18/14 at 02:46 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I have used it in 1989 to make models to move to 8 digital tracks in 1995.
I agree with the previous opinions.
What I liked is the roundness of the preamps that looked a lot warmer than my previous TASCAM 244 sound.
I'm not too used actually, because I was out of inspiration. I was prolixte with TASCAM.
I kept it for a day duplicate my tapes on digital (which I have not done for lack of time and energy.
I agree with the previous opinions.
What I liked is the roundness of the preamps that looked a lot warmer than my previous TASCAM 244 sound.
I'm not too used actually, because I was out of inspiration. I was prolixte with TASCAM.
I kept it for a day duplicate my tapes on digital (which I have not done for lack of time and energy.
21
»
fedthoPublished on 09/06/03 at 17:50 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I absolutely confirms the positive opinion of manu studio!
First (and only) multitrack tape for me too. I tonn friends with qulit Sound: 9.5 cm / sec. AND a dbx, was really a diffrence.
Today (a gives an ide of my money), I used the table to mix into my Audiophile 2496 (and, incidentally, trs fills this mission!).
I also share the same manu's Reserved, by adding an output level gnral a little weak, which requires pushing Reduces the volume and in part the good work of dbx ...
But for the price the era, c'tait a deal!
There was a version 4 inputs (The "MT-1X," if my memory is good ...), no effects sends, and without the display trs cool, while green and red , rtroclair on...…
First (and only) multitrack tape for me too. I tonn friends with qulit Sound: 9.5 cm / sec. AND a dbx, was really a diffrence.
Today (a gives an ide of my money), I used the table to mix into my Audiophile 2496 (and, incidentally, trs fills this mission!).
I also share the same manu's Reserved, by adding an output level gnral a little weak, which requires pushing Reduces the volume and in part the good work of dbx ...
But for the price the era, c'tait a deal!
There was a version 4 inputs (The "MT-1X," if my memory is good ...), no effects sends, and without the display trs cool, while green and red , rtroclair on...…
Read more
I absolutely confirms the positive opinion of manu studio!
First (and only) multitrack tape for me too. I tonn friends with qulit Sound: 9.5 cm / sec. AND a dbx, was really a diffrence.
Today (a gives an ide of my money), I used the table to mix into my Audiophile 2496 (and, incidentally, trs fills this mission!).
I also share the same manu's Reserved, by adding an output level gnral a little weak, which requires pushing Reduces the volume and in part the good work of dbx ...
But for the price the era, c'tait a deal!
There was a version 4 inputs (The "MT-1X," if my memory is good ...), no effects sends, and without the display trs cool, while green and red , rtroclair on black, even the VU meters taient drawings LEDs ...
(The TEAC and Tascam taient onreux much, although in a more robust and qualitatively CATEGORY probably not far above)
First (and only) multitrack tape for me too. I tonn friends with qulit Sound: 9.5 cm / sec. AND a dbx, was really a diffrence.
Today (a gives an ide of my money), I used the table to mix into my Audiophile 2496 (and, incidentally, trs fills this mission!).
I also share the same manu's Reserved, by adding an output level gnral a little weak, which requires pushing Reduces the volume and in part the good work of dbx ...
But for the price the era, c'tait a deal!
There was a version 4 inputs (The "MT-1X," if my memory is good ...), no effects sends, and without the display trs cool, while green and red , rtroclair on black, even the VU meters taient drawings LEDs ...
(The TEAC and Tascam taient onreux much, although in a more robust and qualitatively CATEGORY probably not far above)
See less
30
»
nicolashotmailPublished on 02/11/05 at 01:45 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I use this multitrack for almost 10 years.
I find it convenient, simple, effective, flexible, compact.
J'apprcie particularly the 8-track with two loops and effects qualisation.
One can only regret that in edit mode, the last 4 tracks have only two bands qualisation but I was never too possible problem.
I possdait prcedement April 1 runway, which I think is really not a good choice.
With eight tracks, you can switch on the six tracks remaining two to get an infinite number of tracks casi.
Trs good audio quality (especially for a device k7).
Trs qualitprix good value, I do it again though with this choice the evolution of technology it becomes tempting to spend on the PC...…
I find it convenient, simple, effective, flexible, compact.
J'apprcie particularly the 8-track with two loops and effects qualisation.
One can only regret that in edit mode, the last 4 tracks have only two bands qualisation but I was never too possible problem.
I possdait prcedement April 1 runway, which I think is really not a good choice.
With eight tracks, you can switch on the six tracks remaining two to get an infinite number of tracks casi.
Trs good audio quality (especially for a device k7).
Trs qualitprix good value, I do it again though with this choice the evolution of technology it becomes tempting to spend on the PC...…
Read more
I use this multitrack for almost 10 years.
I find it convenient, simple, effective, flexible, compact.
J'apprcie particularly the 8-track with two loops and effects qualisation.
One can only regret that in edit mode, the last 4 tracks have only two bands qualisation but I was never too possible problem.
I possdait prcedement April 1 runway, which I think is really not a good choice.
With eight tracks, you can switch on the six tracks remaining two to get an infinite number of tracks casi.
Trs good audio quality (especially for a device k7).
Trs qualitprix good value, I do it again though with this choice the evolution of technology it becomes tempting to spend on the PC editing software + + big sound card = more possibilities but less easy and more cumbersome.
I find it convenient, simple, effective, flexible, compact.
J'apprcie particularly the 8-track with two loops and effects qualisation.
One can only regret that in edit mode, the last 4 tracks have only two bands qualisation but I was never too possible problem.
I possdait prcedement April 1 runway, which I think is really not a good choice.
With eight tracks, you can switch on the six tracks remaining two to get an infinite number of tracks casi.
Trs good audio quality (especially for a device k7).
Trs qualitprix good value, I do it again though with this choice the evolution of technology it becomes tempting to spend on the PC editing software + + big sound card = more possibilities but less easy and more cumbersome.
See less
30
»
Moscozicgood stuff but surpassed by the digital
Published on 03/12/11 at 01:55 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I used it for 4-5 years, I had the opportunity to use Yamaha and Fostex 4-track analog before it.
What I liked about this multitrack is that you can use it as a mixing desk because of its features are very comprehensive. I had the opportunity to record live and studio session of music and songs which were published and disseminated.
Despite this, it remains a cassette tape machine, and do not hesitate to take the ultimate in quality material, otherwise the sound will be rotten.
If I had a choice again, I would go digital, especially for the studio. For live, if I had more, I will not hesitate to me helping.
What I liked about this multitrack is that you can use it as a mixing desk because of its features are very comprehensive. I had the opportunity to record live and studio session of music and songs which were published and disseminated.
Despite this, it remains a cassette tape machine, and do not hesitate to take the ultimate in quality material, otherwise the sound will be rotten.
If I had a choice again, I would go digital, especially for the studio. For live, if I had more, I will not hesitate to me helping.
10
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Yamaha
- Model: MT8X
- Category: Analog Multitrack-studios
- Added in our database on: 08/28/2008
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Manuals and other files
Other categories in Analog recorders
Other names: mt8x, mt 8x, mt8 x