Audition 2 classified ad
Alerte nouvelle annonceAdobe Audition 2 forums
Images
Reviews
3.2/5(10 reviews)
30 %
30 %
10 %
10 %
20 %
Write a user review
abronsiusPublished on 02/14/06 at 13:41 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Download super painful. The database profiles ADOBE ID is managed with the feet, it is very difficult and painful to get on the download page. Fortunately, the installation goes smoothly. The config is standard, the contents of the menus a little mixed. Some new options are checked by default which causes bizarre workings such as fade in that starts with a fade out then fade in to a ...
The super big problem with the config is the management of the sound card. So ok, it's done: config for editing, for multitrack and surround with lots of parameters. But the config that worked so well under 1.0 e 1.5 is no longer available and given that the coup is no longer possible to listen to what...…
The super big problem with the config is the management of the sound card. So ok, it's done: config for editing, for multitrack and surround with lots of parameters. But the config that worked so well under 1.0 e 1.5 is no longer available and given that the coup is no longer possible to listen to what...…
Read more
Download super painful. The database profiles ADOBE ID is managed with the feet, it is very difficult and painful to get on the download page. Fortunately, the installation goes smoothly. The config is standard, the contents of the menus a little mixed. Some new options are checked by default which causes bizarre workings such as fade in that starts with a fade out then fade in to a ...
The super big problem with the config is the management of the sound card. So ok, it's done: config for editing, for multitrack and surround with lots of parameters. But the config that worked so well under 1.0 e 1.5 is no longer available and given that the coup is no longer possible to listen to what is recorded, it puts super bad! In my case, I use channels 1 / 2 digital recording and 1 / 2 analog monitoring. So I went back to version 1.5 for registration!
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
PC: Athlon XP 2400 + 2.0 GHz, 1 GB RAM, 150 SATA HDD in RAID0, Win XP with SP2 (essential for Audition 2), sound card DIGI96 / 8 (8 channels in / out analog / digital 24-bit 96 kHz). More than enough for the 1.5 but the 2.0 interface is very 'soft' in comparison. Many wait until you can start reading, etc ... It is stable but it gives a light feeling to skate in the semolina. In addition, backup files cause breaks in the reading file.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for one week and if it was improved algorithms for processing (noise reduction, cracking, etc.), I'll come no one on the 1.5. Overall, I'm still very disappointed, it makes you want to see what the competition!
The super big problem with the config is the management of the sound card. So ok, it's done: config for editing, for multitrack and surround with lots of parameters. But the config that worked so well under 1.0 e 1.5 is no longer available and given that the coup is no longer possible to listen to what is recorded, it puts super bad! In my case, I use channels 1 / 2 digital recording and 1 / 2 analog monitoring. So I went back to version 1.5 for registration!
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
PC: Athlon XP 2400 + 2.0 GHz, 1 GB RAM, 150 SATA HDD in RAID0, Win XP with SP2 (essential for Audition 2), sound card DIGI96 / 8 (8 channels in / out analog / digital 24-bit 96 kHz). More than enough for the 1.5 but the 2.0 interface is very 'soft' in comparison. Many wait until you can start reading, etc ... It is stable but it gives a light feeling to skate in the semolina. In addition, backup files cause breaks in the reading file.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for one week and if it was improved algorithms for processing (noise reduction, cracking, etc.), I'll come no one on the 1.5. Overall, I'm still very disappointed, it makes you want to see what the competition!
See less
00
»
lonomatopeurPublished on 02/17/06 at 03:15 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
-The instalation is done without problem as always with Adobe products
-No problem with my sound card
-The setup is simple for me because I worked previously with the 1.5
-I have not opened yet ... I aprendre by clicking
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
-P4, 1024ddr, 130go drive and sound card ego sys 192m
-The software works perfectly well
-Treatments are often faster than the 1.5
Yes, more stable than the 1.5 especially at the VST Multitrack Recording
OVERALL OPINION
I have been using 2semaines
The design is beautiful, but I think it hurts a little performance, ogranisation menus is sometimes risky but the use of software is simple and good outcome.
"I had tried the...…
-No problem with my sound card
-The setup is simple for me because I worked previously with the 1.5
-I have not opened yet ... I aprendre by clicking
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
-P4, 1024ddr, 130go drive and sound card ego sys 192m
-The software works perfectly well
-Treatments are often faster than the 1.5
Yes, more stable than the 1.5 especially at the VST Multitrack Recording
OVERALL OPINION
I have been using 2semaines
The design is beautiful, but I think it hurts a little performance, ogranisation menus is sometimes risky but the use of software is simple and good outcome.
"I had tried the...…
Read more
-The instalation is done without problem as always with Adobe products
-No problem with my sound card
-The setup is simple for me because I worked previously with the 1.5
-I have not opened yet ... I aprendre by clicking
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
-P4, 1024ddr, 130go drive and sound card ego sys 192m
-The software works perfectly well
-Treatments are often faster than the 1.5
Yes, more stable than the 1.5 especially at the VST Multitrack Recording
OVERALL OPINION
I have been using 2semaines
The design is beautiful, but I think it hurts a little performance, ogranisation menus is sometimes risky but the use of software is simple and good outcome.
"I had tried the previous version, and at a friend's Nuendo and WaveLab
-The software is still expensive, so if possible try it before.
-I think I migrate to a station better integrating video, such as Nuendo, but this is not the same price
-No problem with my sound card
-The setup is simple for me because I worked previously with the 1.5
-I have not opened yet ... I aprendre by clicking
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
-P4, 1024ddr, 130go drive and sound card ego sys 192m
-The software works perfectly well
-Treatments are often faster than the 1.5
Yes, more stable than the 1.5 especially at the VST Multitrack Recording
OVERALL OPINION
I have been using 2semaines
The design is beautiful, but I think it hurts a little performance, ogranisation menus is sometimes risky but the use of software is simple and good outcome.
"I had tried the previous version, and at a friend's Nuendo and WaveLab
-The software is still expensive, so if possible try it before.
-I think I migrate to a station better integrating video, such as Nuendo, but this is not the same price
See less
00
»
7continentPublished on 03/04/06 at 05:50 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Installing on a laptop asus centrino with no problem
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Centrino technology intel/1024 ram / two hard drives 1 100G and 250G Eexternal iomega
fontion no problem
faster than 1.5 for all with regard to treatment vst direct x and windows are of good quality
no crash with the sound card edirol usb ua25
OVERALL OPINION
Less than 1 month but intensment
support plug-ins more than the 1.5 INTERESTED
I regret some tools that have been less available than does the other version
I also gard 1.5 for the office but the mix I did in the 2.0
quality good value for money.
I repeat the same choice …
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Centrino technology intel/1024 ram / two hard drives 1 100G and 250G Eexternal iomega
fontion no problem
faster than 1.5 for all with regard to treatment vst direct x and windows are of good quality
no crash with the sound card edirol usb ua25
OVERALL OPINION
Less than 1 month but intensment
support plug-ins more than the 1.5 INTERESTED
I regret some tools that have been less available than does the other version
I also gard 1.5 for the office but the mix I did in the 2.0
quality good value for money.
I repeat the same choice …
Read more
Installing on a laptop asus centrino with no problem
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Centrino technology intel/1024 ram / two hard drives 1 100G and 250G Eexternal iomega
fontion no problem
faster than 1.5 for all with regard to treatment vst direct x and windows are of good quality
no crash with the sound card edirol usb ua25
OVERALL OPINION
Less than 1 month but intensment
support plug-ins more than the 1.5 INTERESTED
I regret some tools that have been less available than does the other version
I also gard 1.5 for the office but the mix I did in the 2.0
quality good value for money.
I repeat the same choice
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Centrino technology intel/1024 ram / two hard drives 1 100G and 250G Eexternal iomega
fontion no problem
faster than 1.5 for all with regard to treatment vst direct x and windows are of good quality
no crash with the sound card edirol usb ua25
OVERALL OPINION
Less than 1 month but intensment
support plug-ins more than the 1.5 INTERESTED
I regret some tools that have been less available than does the other version
I also gard 1.5 for the office but the mix I did in the 2.0
quality good value for money.
I repeat the same choice
See less
00
»
wattiePublished on 05/09/06 at 21:51 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Installation without problem but happy, I have a new computer ...
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
The software works very well, that's not the question ... Next!
OVERALL OPINION
2 weeks of use and return to version 1.5.
I had great fear when Adobe has gotten hold of Cool Edit Pro
Adobe Audition to rename it but the change was not brutal until version 2
and everything was fine. Interfaces usual crappy Adobe (well known on the Mac) had not been imposed except for the version 2.0. Horrible design. Functions withdrawn, less intuitive interface (I had the misfortune to undock the panel from the drive and impossible to replace, or ca ca fleet closes but it does rooted more) ... What are...…
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
The software works very well, that's not the question ... Next!
OVERALL OPINION
2 weeks of use and return to version 1.5.
I had great fear when Adobe has gotten hold of Cool Edit Pro
Adobe Audition to rename it but the change was not brutal until version 2
and everything was fine. Interfaces usual crappy Adobe (well known on the Mac) had not been imposed except for the version 2.0. Horrible design. Functions withdrawn, less intuitive interface (I had the misfortune to undock the panel from the drive and impossible to replace, or ca ca fleet closes but it does rooted more) ... What are...…
Read more
Installation without problem but happy, I have a new computer ...
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
The software works very well, that's not the question ... Next!
OVERALL OPINION
2 weeks of use and return to version 1.5.
I had great fear when Adobe has gotten hold of Cool Edit Pro
Adobe Audition to rename it but the change was not brutal until version 2
and everything was fine. Interfaces usual crappy Adobe (well known on the Mac) had not been imposed except for the version 2.0. Horrible design. Functions withdrawn, less intuitive interface (I had the misfortune to undock the panel from the drive and impossible to replace, or ca ca fleet closes but it does rooted more) ... What are these changes if not to harm the user and make him want to go somewhere else? Other software made the ereur as ACDSee, Paint Shop Pro, and so on, changing the user loved nazes for functions, programs and imposing heavy and definitely not intuitive interface ...
Ok Adobe added asio mode and other things but I spent so adios before version 2, return the 1.5, more convenient, simpler, less pretentious and much more convenient. Provided this is not the end of this software yet well thought previously ... : C (
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
The software works very well, that's not the question ... Next!
OVERALL OPINION
2 weeks of use and return to version 1.5.
I had great fear when Adobe has gotten hold of Cool Edit Pro
Adobe Audition to rename it but the change was not brutal until version 2
and everything was fine. Interfaces usual crappy Adobe (well known on the Mac) had not been imposed except for the version 2.0. Horrible design. Functions withdrawn, less intuitive interface (I had the misfortune to undock the panel from the drive and impossible to replace, or ca ca fleet closes but it does rooted more) ... What are these changes if not to harm the user and make him want to go somewhere else? Other software made the ereur as ACDSee, Paint Shop Pro, and so on, changing the user loved nazes for functions, programs and imposing heavy and definitely not intuitive interface ...
Ok Adobe added asio mode and other things but I spent so adios before version 2, return the 1.5, more convenient, simpler, less pretentious and much more convenient. Provided this is not the end of this software yet well thought previously ... : C (
See less
00
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Adobe
- Model: Audition 2
- Category: Digital Audio Editors
- Added in our database on: 01/17/2006
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Music Software
Other names: audition 2, audition2
