entilzaah
Published on 04/24/06 at 01:16
For CHARACTERISTICS, dj is indicated everywhere. I note even when the possibility to record 96khz, which is not so common in this range of hardware (side of the mdaille, the 16 tracks becomes a 8 tracks ...). Analog compressors are efficient and useful trs, trs the touch screen functionality, automation even without the sliders motoriss is great, everything is intuitive and trs above all: it sounds!
I regret that I can be just as 8 standard inserts is not good but we made do.
UTILIZATION
Use: a child's play is the IDAL for musicians / probes: there is too much, but there are enough and the game even when mixing come, was what to do.
The manual is well done, there is a priori in English, but even for someone who does not speak English School is well understood at all.
SOUNDS
That's what I prfre: the sound and dynamics are good trs. I can not believe the sound of the bass in particular; My first multitrack silent a little Korg D8. This silent a little limited but there was a particular sound. Then I had a boss br1180: trs good but not the warmth of her. And with the D16XD I find the heat of the first D8.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 1 month, I love the sound especially the touch screen, the effects of analog compressors and automation. I regret the lack of inserts but not rdibitoire and may be the sound it makes, forcing many s'loigner with a condenser microphone.
Report quality price is on, it's expensive, it can do more with a PC and Cubase for the same price, but to record an album paralllement config on a PC correct, I prf re D16XD 10 times that does not crash when it was taken, that sounds right away, that the pots, which does not fool after 4h unlike a PC on which a head or more eyes after 4 hours, plus it has a pretty face! What ease of use compared to the pc.
Without hsiter with the same budget, I do it again the same choice 10 times
At 23/04/06, I just see the D3200, which offers 32 tracks for less than 2000, gives a arflchir, even if it does not touch screen and compressors analog: If I had known, I would opt for the pt to be 3200 ... but d16dx qd m is a super BCAN.
I regret that I can be just as 8 standard inserts is not good but we made do.
UTILIZATION
Use: a child's play is the IDAL for musicians / probes: there is too much, but there are enough and the game even when mixing come, was what to do.
The manual is well done, there is a priori in English, but even for someone who does not speak English School is well understood at all.
SOUNDS
That's what I prfre: the sound and dynamics are good trs. I can not believe the sound of the bass in particular; My first multitrack silent a little Korg D8. This silent a little limited but there was a particular sound. Then I had a boss br1180: trs good but not the warmth of her. And with the D16XD I find the heat of the first D8.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 1 month, I love the sound especially the touch screen, the effects of analog compressors and automation. I regret the lack of inserts but not rdibitoire and may be the sound it makes, forcing many s'loigner with a condenser microphone.
Report quality price is on, it's expensive, it can do more with a PC and Cubase for the same price, but to record an album paralllement config on a PC correct, I prf re D16XD 10 times that does not crash when it was taken, that sounds right away, that the pots, which does not fool after 4h unlike a PC on which a head or more eyes after 4 hours, plus it has a pretty face! What ease of use compared to the pc.
Without hsiter with the same budget, I do it again the same choice 10 times
At 23/04/06, I just see the D3200, which offers 32 tracks for less than 2000, gives a arflchir, even if it does not touch screen and compressors analog: If I had known, I would opt for the pt to be 3200 ... but d16dx qd m is a super BCAN.