D888 classified ad
New ad alertImages
Reviews
3.9/5(10 reviews)
50 %
30 %
20 %
Write a user review
Anonymous Published on 09/13/07 at 08:47 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
All adja t dit.Une output in the twelve o'clock would have been welcome (or 9)
USE
The interface of a good small table analog, recorder and more. (For simplicity)
SONORITS
Personally, nothing redire.Mais the fx section is a bit limited for those who would avoid buying a multi-effects: reverbs and delays only, with very little rglages
NOTICE GLOBAL
I use them for a good year, despite no probs use intensive.Et I've had bcanes !!!
The least:
Too poor fx section, it would not have t has would not drang me.
Plus:
Personally, it's the ease and rapidity for transfrer my tracks via USB (in comparison with the Tascam 2488 I also used and which reveals much more complex...…
USE
The interface of a good small table analog, recorder and more. (For simplicity)
SONORITS
Personally, nothing redire.Mais the fx section is a bit limited for those who would avoid buying a multi-effects: reverbs and delays only, with very little rglages
NOTICE GLOBAL
I use them for a good year, despite no probs use intensive.Et I've had bcanes !!!
The least:
Too poor fx section, it would not have t has would not drang me.
Plus:
Personally, it's the ease and rapidity for transfrer my tracks via USB (in comparison with the Tascam 2488 I also used and which reveals much more complex...…
Read more
All adja t dit.Une output in the twelve o'clock would have been welcome (or 9)
USE
The interface of a good small table analog, recorder and more. (For simplicity)
SONORITS
Personally, nothing redire.Mais the fx section is a bit limited for those who would avoid buying a multi-effects: reverbs and delays only, with very little rglages
NOTICE GLOBAL
I use them for a good year, despite no probs use intensive.Et I've had bcanes !!!
The least:
Too poor fx section, it would not have t has would not drang me.
Plus:
Personally, it's the ease and rapidity for transfrer my tracks via USB (in comparison with the Tascam 2488 I also used and which reveals much more complex (boring) on this point).
<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- How do you report qualitprix?
- With the exprience, you do again this choice ?.</span>
Very good report qualitprix
Clear is also has a tude.Achet based dpanner for me, following a failure of my recorder, the D888 is now connected to my computer table and my coutes in my studio.C'est really the perfect complment my ordi.Mme if for recording more "chiads" I spend about 2488, but it is a matter of tracks numbers and fx ( not the same range but on a basic bcane type, the D888 absolutely not as a blush, quite the opposite !!!
USE
The interface of a good small table analog, recorder and more. (For simplicity)
SONORITS
Personally, nothing redire.Mais the fx section is a bit limited for those who would avoid buying a multi-effects: reverbs and delays only, with very little rglages
NOTICE GLOBAL
I use them for a good year, despite no probs use intensive.Et I've had bcanes !!!
The least:
Too poor fx section, it would not have t has would not drang me.
Plus:
Personally, it's the ease and rapidity for transfrer my tracks via USB (in comparison with the Tascam 2488 I also used and which reveals much more complex (boring) on this point).
<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>- How do you report qualitprix?
- With the exprience, you do again this choice ?.</span>
Very good report qualitprix
Clear is also has a tude.Achet based dpanner for me, following a failure of my recorder, the D888 is now connected to my computer table and my coutes in my studio.C'est really the perfect complment my ordi.Mme if for recording more "chiads" I spend about 2488, but it is a matter of tracks numbers and fx ( not the same range but on a basic bcane type, the D888 absolutely not as a blush, quite the opposite !!!
See less
00
»
cess01Good Gear
Published on 04/30/13 at 02:33 (This content has been automatically translated from French)8 track analog + spdif midi out and usb ...
Internal hard drive for recording live.
That's good .... for recording live or in the studio!
UTILIZATION
Supports simple and intuitive hand manual I can admit a messy!
The function is very accessible and clear (color code).
Simple recording 8 track silmultané (vocals / guitar / sax / bar / synthé...etc)
Ability to export records (in separate track or master) live in the daw (logic / cubase / protools...etc)
Full well the same function + + +
SOUNDS
Yes the good stuff! especially for recording a live band such as separate track and worked again later this track on computer very simply! and efficiently!
The effect is not...…
Internal hard drive for recording live.
That's good .... for recording live or in the studio!
UTILIZATION
Supports simple and intuitive hand manual I can admit a messy!
The function is very accessible and clear (color code).
Simple recording 8 track silmultané (vocals / guitar / sax / bar / synthé...etc)
Ability to export records (in separate track or master) live in the daw (logic / cubase / protools...etc)
Full well the same function + + +
SOUNDS
Yes the good stuff! especially for recording a live band such as separate track and worked again later this track on computer very simply! and efficiently!
The effect is not...…
Read more
8 track analog + spdif midi out and usb ...
Internal hard drive for recording live.
That's good .... for recording live or in the studio!
UTILIZATION
Supports simple and intuitive hand manual I can admit a messy!
The function is very accessible and clear (color code).
Simple recording 8 track silmultané (vocals / guitar / sax / bar / synthé...etc)
Ability to export records (in separate track or master) live in the daw (logic / cubase / protools...etc)
Full well the same function + + +
SOUNDS
Yes the good stuff! especially for recording a live band such as separate track and worked again later this track on computer very simply! and efficiently!
The effect is not great but hey it's Still a good take.
Good momentum in general.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 3 years I did not try hard to model before! but with the shape of mixing studio I've never found better and especially simple to handle.
The 8-track recording easy import / export in the computer / machine.
The sound quality when recording live.
The ease of connection and portability of this studio.
The value for money is good especially now occas it is really cheap!
Yes I remake the same choice as I have many recording thanks to him
Internal hard drive for recording live.
That's good .... for recording live or in the studio!
UTILIZATION
Supports simple and intuitive hand manual I can admit a messy!
The function is very accessible and clear (color code).
Simple recording 8 track silmultané (vocals / guitar / sax / bar / synthé...etc)
Ability to export records (in separate track or master) live in the daw (logic / cubase / protools...etc)
Full well the same function + + +
SOUNDS
Yes the good stuff! especially for recording a live band such as separate track and worked again later this track on computer very simply! and efficiently!
The effect is not great but hey it's Still a good take.
Good momentum in general.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 3 years I did not try hard to model before! but with the shape of mixing studio I've never found better and especially simple to handle.
The 8-track recording easy import / export in the computer / machine.
The sound quality when recording live.
The ease of connection and portability of this studio.
The value for money is good especially now occas it is really cheap!
Yes I remake the same choice as I have many recording thanks to him
See less
100
»
yann691Published on 05/28/06 at 13:05 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Numrique hard disk recorder.
.wav/44 8 tracks, 1 / 16 in both reading and recording.
Mixer with Phantom Alim, Eq 3, Effects, Pan ...
40 GB HDD, MTC sync (out only)
UTILIZATION
Everything is on hand, use is fairly simple, given that both menus are basic. The screen is tiny, but enough to save.
The next edition will be on a PC (USB 2 fast mounts directly on the desktop).
The manual can go further, but the grip is Quad IMMEDIATE.
SOUNDS
The converters are of good quality (transparent what is it?) Certainly not from the D3200?
The effects are basic (Rev and Delays) but adequate on the road shuffled things.
The sound is good.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for a week, and...…
.wav/44 8 tracks, 1 / 16 in both reading and recording.
Mixer with Phantom Alim, Eq 3, Effects, Pan ...
40 GB HDD, MTC sync (out only)
UTILIZATION
Everything is on hand, use is fairly simple, given that both menus are basic. The screen is tiny, but enough to save.
The next edition will be on a PC (USB 2 fast mounts directly on the desktop).
The manual can go further, but the grip is Quad IMMEDIATE.
SOUNDS
The converters are of good quality (transparent what is it?) Certainly not from the D3200?
The effects are basic (Rev and Delays) but adequate on the road shuffled things.
The sound is good.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for a week, and...…
Read more
Numrique hard disk recorder.
.wav/44 8 tracks, 1 / 16 in both reading and recording.
Mixer with Phantom Alim, Eq 3, Effects, Pan ...
40 GB HDD, MTC sync (out only)
UTILIZATION
Everything is on hand, use is fairly simple, given that both menus are basic. The screen is tiny, but enough to save.
The next edition will be on a PC (USB 2 fast mounts directly on the desktop).
The manual can go further, but the grip is Quad IMMEDIATE.
SOUNDS
The converters are of good quality (transparent what is it?) Certainly not from the D3200?
The effects are basic (Rev and Delays) but adequate on the road shuffled things.
The sound is good.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for a week, and I begin to have under control.
It is a very practical machine for making models or taken anywhere in complment a computer audio system.
It seems solid and reliable.
Could overshadow more expensive products and all plastic.
Designed Fawn simple and effective, it is a multitrack audio in which the eight tracks are on hand. It allows you to work fast and have all files ACCS simply and without conversion or software landlord.
This machine rpond my needs perfectly on the road.
In esprant I can put a bigger HDD in the future.
.wav/44 8 tracks, 1 / 16 in both reading and recording.
Mixer with Phantom Alim, Eq 3, Effects, Pan ...
40 GB HDD, MTC sync (out only)
UTILIZATION
Everything is on hand, use is fairly simple, given that both menus are basic. The screen is tiny, but enough to save.
The next edition will be on a PC (USB 2 fast mounts directly on the desktop).
The manual can go further, but the grip is Quad IMMEDIATE.
SOUNDS
The converters are of good quality (transparent what is it?) Certainly not from the D3200?
The effects are basic (Rev and Delays) but adequate on the road shuffled things.
The sound is good.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for a week, and I begin to have under control.
It is a very practical machine for making models or taken anywhere in complment a computer audio system.
It seems solid and reliable.
Could overshadow more expensive products and all plastic.
Designed Fawn simple and effective, it is a multitrack audio in which the eight tracks are on hand. It allows you to work fast and have all files ACCS simply and without conversion or software landlord.
This machine rpond my needs perfectly on the road.
In esprant I can put a bigger HDD in the future.
See less
00
»
aston-mortonPublished on 06/06/06 at 02:42 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
No better than the advice above ...
UTILIZATION
I've had three weeks, and actually getting started is very fast: we will dive into the record for very specific things.
Note: at the time of my purchase, the manual in French was not yet available from Korg.
SOUNDS
Not registering levels of background noise, but live music, the results are very faithful to its original color. Is this transparency?
Anyway, beyond the performance displayed, judged on the result, which is very good. However, the recording technique (choice of microphones, positioning, adjustment of earnings, balance, etc ...) is more important than the technology (which is more than enough).
OVERALL OPINION
It...…
UTILIZATION
I've had three weeks, and actually getting started is very fast: we will dive into the record for very specific things.
Note: at the time of my purchase, the manual in French was not yet available from Korg.
SOUNDS
Not registering levels of background noise, but live music, the results are very faithful to its original color. Is this transparency?
Anyway, beyond the performance displayed, judged on the result, which is very good. However, the recording technique (choice of microphones, positioning, adjustment of earnings, balance, etc ...) is more important than the technology (which is more than enough).
OVERALL OPINION
It...…
Read more
No better than the advice above ...
UTILIZATION
I've had three weeks, and actually getting started is very fast: we will dive into the record for very specific things.
Note: at the time of my purchase, the manual in French was not yet available from Korg.
SOUNDS
Not registering levels of background noise, but live music, the results are very faithful to its original color. Is this transparency?
Anyway, beyond the performance displayed, judged on the result, which is very good. However, the recording technique (choice of microphones, positioning, adjustment of earnings, balance, etc ...) is more important than the technology (which is more than enough).
OVERALL OPINION
It is a machine very relevant, almost all terrain. Long-awaited arrival on the market of a system of this type.
Record all the rehearsals and performances of his group of 8 simultaneous tracks, it's a very good thing.
It's very complementary to a home studio and ProTools or other much more flexible use.
the quality / price is reasonable.
UTILIZATION
I've had three weeks, and actually getting started is very fast: we will dive into the record for very specific things.
Note: at the time of my purchase, the manual in French was not yet available from Korg.
SOUNDS
Not registering levels of background noise, but live music, the results are very faithful to its original color. Is this transparency?
Anyway, beyond the performance displayed, judged on the result, which is very good. However, the recording technique (choice of microphones, positioning, adjustment of earnings, balance, etc ...) is more important than the technology (which is more than enough).
OVERALL OPINION
It is a machine very relevant, almost all terrain. Long-awaited arrival on the market of a system of this type.
Record all the rehearsals and performances of his group of 8 simultaneous tracks, it's a very good thing.
It's very complementary to a home studio and ProTools or other much more flexible use.
the quality / price is reasonable.
See less
00
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Korg
- Model: D888
- Category: Digital Multrack-studios
- Added in our database on: 02/08/2006
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Manuals and other files
Other categories in Digital recorders
Other names: d888, d 888