Bazoom
Note : 10 sur 10
Published on 03/27/03 at 03:38
I will not here again numrer what trs well done VET, I share the opinion that 100%
UTILIZATION
I find this camera a little complicated for the typical person (I am), having no notion in the record Dtd.
The machine is powerful but none, I believe, intuitive.
The manual does not help unfortunately this regard because of its complexity dconcertante same.
SOUNDS
I am not a specialist in the digital and Save, as VET, this is my first DTD (APRS be used long ago, a Tascam 4-track K7).
The sound unit dlivre be neutral and I think that's what I wanted.
The quality is perfect for me to use my Home Studio.
OVERALL OPINION
I possde for a little over one month but I confess to not m'tre immersed srieusement on bte once or twice due to time constraints.
This is my first multitrack digital and I thought I could quickly finalize a CD and this, Manir innit! Nni ... that we must delve into the Mandres the manual for this.
It is impossible to work instinct with this mini-studio, but the habit of recording should find their account nanmoins (operation PRO!).
Before, I barnacles audio into the microphone and I climbed through the reader of the latter.
Obviously, the mix (if not usurped talking about mixing) and ZrO c'tait linear but have tweaked via the APRS squenceur, finalizing the Cd silent relatively simple.
However, the quality did not suit me and the many crashes microphone inhrents Exceeds the result of alterations of memory (although 768 MB of RAM) DCID me move on indpendant mini-studio.
I also tudi other stuff and, frankly, there's no price report better quality especially as the construction of the device (not plastoc) is reassuring.
But it may be that if the D1600 CDR had t the price of the AW16 G. ...
UTILIZATION
I find this camera a little complicated for the typical person (I am), having no notion in the record Dtd.
The machine is powerful but none, I believe, intuitive.
The manual does not help unfortunately this regard because of its complexity dconcertante same.
SOUNDS
I am not a specialist in the digital and Save, as VET, this is my first DTD (APRS be used long ago, a Tascam 4-track K7).
The sound unit dlivre be neutral and I think that's what I wanted.
The quality is perfect for me to use my Home Studio.
OVERALL OPINION
I possde for a little over one month but I confess to not m'tre immersed srieusement on bte once or twice due to time constraints.
This is my first multitrack digital and I thought I could quickly finalize a CD and this, Manir innit! Nni ... that we must delve into the Mandres the manual for this.
It is impossible to work instinct with this mini-studio, but the habit of recording should find their account nanmoins (operation PRO!).
Before, I barnacles audio into the microphone and I climbed through the reader of the latter.
Obviously, the mix (if not usurped talking about mixing) and ZrO c'tait linear but have tweaked via the APRS squenceur, finalizing the Cd silent relatively simple.
However, the quality did not suit me and the many crashes microphone inhrents Exceeds the result of alterations of memory (although 768 MB of RAM) DCID me move on indpendant mini-studio.
I also tudi other stuff and, frankly, there's no price report better quality especially as the construction of the device (not plastoc) is reassuring.
But it may be that if the D1600 CDR had t the price of the AW16 G. ...