All user reviews of 5/5 for the Shure 520DX

Micro "for" harmonious
dynamic microphone

Vintage appearance. Pretty enough.
Wiring particular (original, it is wired with a standard jack)

Practice: a volume of pota t rgler addition to the base of the gain

OVERALL OPINION

- I've had less than a month
- I love the look (although I prfere the look of the Astatic JT-30 taken up by the name of hohner blues blaster).
Good grip. A little heavy anyway, I find it quite comfortable.
On a Peavey Classic 30 is a true massacre. I had the blues blaster is crappy cot.
I trs little feedback, it RULES easily and allows me to have the grain on my amp
- I changed it against a blues blaster: Honestly, I feel I have done a great deal ... I bought a deprecated blues blaster nine.
The DX 520 is expensive ... but worth it! To be taken especially for the look!
- New: Report quality / price is not terrible, I will opt instead for a sm58 with pota volume hohner (which fits all microphones songs)
- To change this, I start again without hsiter!
It's the sound I was looking on the peavey

Namely: the hohner blues blaster from home does not sound really bad on a classic 30 ...

This is the microphone must be in its package possder outil.Je deprecated never buy used gear. http://microharmo.free.fr

OVERALL OPINION

It's a typical, though crunchy. You nobtiendrez rsultat not versatile with this machine "trononner". Apart from research will prcise well, I do not know what micro is compatible with the chromatiqueIl a REFERENCE for blues, rock, absolutely must wash! What is not normal cest nest price. But this subject is to gnral cot overall practice lharmonica. Lessence lharmo of same, its origins, and all The elements that made the Mississippi saxophone are today pollus by price dtournent the particularity of this world . Lharmonica should not be expensive, and the flaming prices kill this instrument, its particularity. We walk on the head, but Acesta REPRESENTATIVES politiqueAlors on this micro and must wash his musette. http://microharmo.free.fr

The Shure 520DX is a dynamic microphone that is suitable for both in the studio or on the stage. While I have only used this microphone for recording, you can definitely use it for live shows as well, whether it be for harmonica or something else. It has a standard XLR connection and while it is designed for use with harmonica, it has a number of other possible applications in addition to the harmonica.

OVERALL OPINION

I've been using the Shure 520DX for about three years and have found it to be a great microphone for recording harmonica and a few other instruments. It is great for harmonica because it is possible to hold the microphone while one is playing so they can get an up close signal coming from the harmonica. While the Shure 520DX is really designed for this harmonica use, I have also had interesting success using this to record snare drum. While it wasn't a standard snare sound that I got, it had an interesting twang to it that works only in certain situations. In addition to these uses, I would encourage those who have this for harmonica to play around with it to see if it is useful in your situation for other things, as you can get some pretty cool sounds. This being said, I would really only recommend picking one of these up if you plan on using it for harmonica, as this is what it is best at and this is what it is designed for. The price of the Shure 520DX isn't too expensive at all, and is really a great value. Shure is known for making top quality microphones, and when it comes to recording a harmonica, the Shure 520DX is a great choice. Overall, another great microphone from the Shure company.