Filter
Our members also liked:
4.2/5(224 reviews)
38 %
38 %
10 %
3 %
2 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
AkdamExcellent product
Published on 07/13/13 at 06:39 (This content has been automatically translated from French)That reputation is second to none
OVERALL OPINION
I use it since 1998 and it never disappointed me, I turn now to one and one SM58 Sennheiser EW100 (yes I is a time he can lol) but for me it is complementary. Sometimes I feel I have a lack of power or EW100. If I had to make a choice tomorrow on the SM58 will be the same without hesitation.11- BobbyLionHair
value s (h) ure
Published on 07/13/13 at 08:48 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for singing
OVERALL OPINION
Used for 2 years
I had several other models (sehneiser, noname).
It is strong, heavy and exudes strength.
This is not the best microphone in the world (unlike the reputation Shure wants to do) but the price is not excessive so I find the quality / good price.
Volume of relatively low output compared to other brands.
It is a micro to do everything, so for me a purchase that I do not regret. A miking guitar or drums is within reach.
I think in the future I'll buy another model / brand for the song (better definition in the treble, higher output volume or less of breath), but it will always be in my briefcase in case !Read moreI use it for singing
OVERALL OPINION
Used for 2 years
I had several other models (sehneiser, noname).
It is strong, heavy and exudes strength.
This is not the best microphone in the world (unlike the reputation Shure wants to do) but the price is not excessive so I find the quality / good price.
Volume of relatively low output compared to other brands.
It is a micro to do everything, so for me a purchase that I do not regret. A miking guitar or drums is within reach.
I think in the future I'll buy another model / brand for the song (better definition in the treble, higher output volume or less of breath), but it will always be in my briefcase in case !See less11 - JuLgtRock
The Reference
Published on 07/11/13 at 04:28 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Dynamic
Singing and other
OVERALL OPINION
This is the benchmark, then it's a matter of taste and / or money03 
phanotPublished on 07/10/13 at 05:00 (This content has been automatically translated from French)singing for the stage and rpeter
OVERALL OPINION
More than 10 years of use
I had a few others of the same kind. Shure is the best.
To get better, there is the Shure Beta 58, (more expensive) or a range squarely top, Neumann and consort (much more expensive)
excellent value for a tireless and effective standard report. The inescapable.01
DaethA must-have
Published on 07/08/13 at 06:23 (This content has been automatically translated from French)cardioid unidirectional dynamic microphone, I use it for singing
OVERALL OPINION
I tested before behringer, not completely satisfied. For this price the SM58 is the job, but beware the effect of adverse nearby: set up a pop filter and do not stick to the microphone.
purchased new at nearly € 100 on the internet, I highly recommend this machine to start.01
Elias :)There is no better
Published on 06/26/13 at 02:57 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Global Cf.Avis
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 15 years. And so time passes!
This is my microphone singing scene.
I also have a BETA 58 as well but I find worse than the SM58.
For the scene, medium or high level buy without prob
03
ben.skiA good micro brawny
Published on 06/25/13 at 07:28 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Versatile cardioid dynamic vocal microphone.
OVERALL OPINION
I i used for a few years before moving knew a higher beta 58 model which I think is a bit thinner and less deaf
Otherwise it is a very good good solid microphone.
I tried other models as a Sennheiser E845 and TT1 prodipe and MC1
The SM58 is the best for me after beta 58 ....Read moreVersatile cardioid dynamic vocal microphone.
OVERALL OPINION
I i used for a few years before moving knew a higher beta 58 model which I think is a bit thinner and less deaf
Otherwise it is a very good good solid microphone.
I tried other models as a Sennheiser E845 and TT1 prodipe and MC1
The SM58 is the best for me after beta 58 ....See less01- vanpet
Timeless
Published on 06/24/13 at 17:28 (This content has been automatically translated from French)The SM58 is a classic dynamic microphone. I use it for everything: voice, guitar amps and bass, claps, percussion, etc..
This mic is solid as a rock. It has already fallen from above, crushed, twisted, and it holds up. This is convenient.
OVERALL OPINION
This is an excellent microphone, I highly recommend it.01 - stell07Published on 06/14/13 at 06:03 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Shure SM 58
OVERALL OPINION
I use them for many années.J have tried several other microphones in equivalent rates (EV. ..) the sM 58 remains the benchmark for prices around hundred €.
True, neutral, solid, to be reserved for the voice ... of course01 
zicrobPretty good but not for singing
Published on 06/10/13 at 10:56 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Sound instrument, backing vocals. Cardioid.
OVERALL OPINION
I'm not used more. My wife is still used for singing. At registration, the difference in intelligibility compared to the Beta 58A is clearly understood. Robust and reliable, probably indestructible. But in my opinion, not for singing. Very good quality / price ratio, however.03
gnguyenbShure SM58, the safe bet
Published on 06/04/13 at 10:34 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Chant
OVERALL OPINION
20 years!
Some ...
+: Reliability -: nothing
Price / quality: excellent!
Yes of course!
Note: The microphone was given to me at the end of a tour in the summer of 1994 and it still works on top. This is great value and can be found everywhere on stages around the world!03- tanoine92
Excellent product
Published on 06/03/13 at 03:27 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Micro Singing and voice. A reference in the world of music. .
- Dynamic Cardioid Mic Type (Unidirectional)
- Bandwidth = 50 to 15 000 Hz
- Impedance = 150 Ohms
- Robust design and high reliability for demanding users
- Body molded enamelled steel
- Enhanced Grid shock pop filter and anti cut sale
OVERALL OPINION
Just a reference. use for 2 years, nothing to say! Excellent quality / price ratio.01 
Nyabin ghiBeasts of a Scene
Published on 06/01/13 at 00:32 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Live for voice is a must, we can also use it in sound studio for some instruments.
Not recommended for voice, under certain conditions eg home studio without a cabin with no sound terrible damage repisse least one limit (. Noise computer ect ...) after for 100 € is better than a bad good dynamic electrostatics.
This is a very good dynamic microphone cardioid unidirectional, it meets the requirements of Live
A lot of confusion with the Beta version of the difference is that this is a hypercardioid.
OVERALL OPINION
This is a microphone that I use for several decades and remains for me a safe bet, live for almost one voice that he uses, it is very rare that we ask another m…Read moreLive for voice is a must, we can also use it in sound studio for some instruments.
Not recommended for voice, under certain conditions eg home studio without a cabin with no sound terrible damage repisse least one limit (. Noise computer ect ...) after for 100 € is better than a bad good dynamic electrostatics.
This is a very good dynamic microphone cardioid unidirectional, it meets the requirements of Live
A lot of confusion with the Beta version of the difference is that this is a hypercardioid.
OVERALL OPINION
This is a microphone that I use for several decades and remains for me a safe bet, live for almost one voice that he uses, it is very rare that we ask another microphone.
No reason to take another because it suits me and I know him.
There are reliable, robust even in a tropical climate (hot / humid) no worries you can count on.
The downside is against the way the opportunity is submerged, it is better (for the price) to buy a new home to a qualified dealer to be sure of the authenticity.
Value / price why not use for this type of micro eyes closed.See less00- c-dric
its reputation is second to none
Published on 05/28/13 at 01:53 (This content has been automatically translated from French)very good vocal microphone, no complaints
OVERALL OPINION
there are probably other alternatives but because it gives me full satisfaction, I see no reason to look any further ...00 
DJBenoîtclassic but .....
Published on 05/24/13 at 20:00 (This content has been automatically translated from French)J has a few, but if I had to do, I'll take the AKG for their clarity and dynamics.
OVERALL OPINION
How long have you use it?
20 years
Have you tried many other models before buying it?
Yes, Sennheiser, AKG
the +: weight, fiabilté
the -; lack of finesse in the treble
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
J keep 1 or 2 in stock for it is the base, then take the AKG02