All user reviews for the Shure SM58

Dynamic microphone for vocals

OVERALL OPINION

I use it in concert for the vote.

Never taking his studio, too colorful and not specific enough.

This mic really colors the sound especially the bass and not very flattering for many voices.
Say that the reference microphone has become wide spread but it is not successful.

It is solid but it was certainly not the best microclimate.

The last microphone I bought for shure is a voice in HF but with Beta 87A head.

For its sheer precision and nothing beats a condenser microphone for even a handheld microphone.
But hey, you have the budget to follow.

Dynamic vocal microphone
Shure kit comes with a completely ridiculous in my opinion, I would have preferred a rigid box m'enfin good ...

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for several years on stage, in rehearsal ...
The sound is good but without a microphone that exudes quality, very solid!
I find it particularly resistant to Larcen yours as long as we correctly
This mic is definitely a reference for strength and durability!
For those with a smaller budget, the MB85 Beta is fairly comparable in terms of minutes and seemed very solid too.

Shure SM58 dynamic cardioid vocal stage.

Very little bass (to compensate for proximity effect)
Its fairly aggressive

OVERALL OPINION

Used for 10 years

Its uniqueness comes from the fact that the musicians did not know that this one like microphone voice and think he is an excellent microphone seeing everywhere. It's a vicious circle: we see very much because he is known and it is known because we see a lot.

Only real quality: robustness after the legendary 565 (you know the one you see in the movie "Woodstock"

Value for money no more correct.

I have to have, otherwise the musicians do not understand, but I prefer to use Beta 58 hypercardioid (less feedback) a little more accurate sound reproduction.

We are facing a dynamic mic format Handholds, served in a solid metal frame. The version in my possession was delivered with a carrying bag made of faux leather quality, but pretty pointless to transport a little more violent. Originally it was the clip microphone and an adapter for a different format of microphone stands.

The microphone is easy to find in stores and is widespread in time. However, beware of very many copies, sometimes performed perfectly (I know a Chinese owner of Shure, the analogy is striking with the original) that pollute the second hand market. There is no way to make a difference for a normal consumer, except for a dismantling of the internal electronic components that should be of a different origin as Mexico made!

All this is good and average.

OVERALL OPINION

Is a microphone that I use for over ten years now. it's been, like many, my first microphone.

Instead of praising or destroyed, as happens too frequently, I prefer to draw up a realistic profile.

This is not the best microclimate in the world, but he does what he has to do quite well. It is quite true, although, like most shure it has its specific grain, slightly sparkling, slightly lisping when attacked too much and a small effect of loudness in the medium which is typical. The highs are there, although not open across. Note also that the "side thickly" described above can become an asset in metal or rock types for which he shows in his place. It is a micro uncritical use, possibly even the microphone as arranging for the live view of its extreme resistance to feedback. It does not require too much should "play the microphone," however, I blame him to quickly lose their effectiveness when we move away a little. Out for softer styles, it makes sense to move away a little, just to counteract the loudness in médlium (which some also call "aggression").

Now, without dec, I knew a lot more open, more dynamic, more defined. Certainly. But never to 130 euros, and rarely compatible with a stage use either, be aware that alternatives exist but at Beyerdynamic, Sennheiser, AKG and Neumann, to name only the best known.

(7) A good mic

Recording and live sound I've been using forever.
I like his strength, I'm more of Live and studio and that's his advantage, after many falls and climatic differences it is still there.
I tried other Beyer, Sennheiser I really liked the sound more crystalline compared to the Shure more medium, but seemed more fragile (for the hard life of the road music). We always see in sets of providers so it shows it is still relevant.
Very good value for money, for the time in any case, today I do not know, (profit requires) the quality of equipment in general tends to decline (in my opinion and this is me request here, I think) but it is also true for the competition.
With experience, I would try maybe a Sennheiser because I like its texture and change.
Anyway there are no secrets, if possible, try different models you like and best match the grain of your voice and of course your budjet.

"Following a request for advice"
dynamic pressure Gradian

OVERALL OPINION

I use it since I started in the trade

microphone to do everything with the SM57, there are much better in German and Austrian at a price, but the data sheets you require, then you follow the music.
I have Beyerdynamic and Sennheiser at a price, they are more accurate and finer on voice and wind instrument ................

after, it is very robust, and will collect anything and everything, and if you are looking for a micro indestructible, OK.

it is a little expensive for the sound it gives

A legend that it is true that micro sound it produces is not as cool as some of the competitors but you must recognize this versatility that is lacking in many, the simplicity of handling this sound to its name This reliability and give us clearly too few places or occur amateur musicians provides a sound worthy of the name and good old SM 58 is doing with honor whatever the gear used. I think he still has good years ahead of him on all the scenes of the world.
Musically. Lawrence

OVERALL OPINION

I use the HF model UR2 and I tested many models Neumann, Shure, AKG, coming back to good old SM 58, which certainly did not sound some others, but what versatility.

I tested this microphone for singing.

OVERALL OPINION

I've tested this mic several times and compare it to others.
First test among a battery of microphones price range of 80 to 170 euros.
This mic is the one I ranked last among all others and respecting the least dull my natural voice.
I could then compare the group because one of the musician had purchased to the chorus ... Again, this microphone has demonstrated its ability ... to Larsen Beyerdynamique compared to my ... and then boldly for the song was not that ...
So I know that bcp swear not shure this, but I invite them to compare to other mics, even cheaper ... 58 In the beta, however, is much better, more expensive, but I think it's the difference if I want to buy Shure ...
I recognize that the SM 58 is its apparent strength. This mic seems to be able to survive several scenes agitated ... Otherwise it's all for my voice type (female voice rather clear), it is completely inappropriate.

This is a Dynamic microphone.  It can be used in almost any setting.  I don't recommend it for Vocals in a Studio setting because you should really be using a quality condenser for that.  But, I was told a few times by a few different people that the SM 58 and the SM 57 are identical microphones with the exception of the Grills.  With that being said, I have used my SM58 on all sorts of gear including Guitar amps, bass amps (in conjunction with a Beta 52a), drums (snares and toms) and yes, even vocals (before I got some nice condensors).  With the exception of Vocals, this thing sounds great on everything in the studio.  There is a reason that Shure SM mics are the industry standard.  They are very clean and crisp and they can take a really good beating and keep on trucking.  As for live situations, these things are essential for any working band or venue.  I used to host an open mic for over a year and the venue had about 6 of these and they were dropped repeatedly buy clumsy or drunk musicians and every single one worked great the whole time I was there.  On top of all that, I asked the owner at one point when he got the mics and he said many years ago.  When it comes down to preference however, I always take my Shure Beta 58a and my BG 5.1 vocal condenser if its just me singing through them.  The SM 58 always rides along but the other two are just all around better/stronger mics.

OVERALL OPINION

One of the best things about all Shure Mics is the amazing warranty they have.  Even when its out of warranty, no matter what happened, or what condition it is in, you can always send it to shure with a nominal fee (about $35 to $40) and get a brand spanking new one in return.   Besides that, this mic also gets props for its ability to take a beating and still sound great.   For the price (under $100) and its durability, this is a great mic.  The precision and quality of the sound is excellent for a mic in this price range.  I have used many different condenser mics including Samsons, Audix (also very nice), and behringer and the only one that can share the stage in my opinion is the Audix.  The rest are just wastes of money.  Yes, I would definitely keep a few of these around all the time.  You never know when you might need one and you can always be sure that it will live up to its reputation.

This dynamic mic is usable for live and studio settings, but it definitely works better in a live setting. There are some instances where it is a good mic to have in the studio. It's quite similar in design to the SM57, the obvious difference being the cap. The round cap on the 58 makes it more ideal for vocals in a live setting, since its ability to pick up voices is enhanced by the cap. In reality, it can be used for almost anything that the SM57 can be used on, which includes guitar/bass/keyboard amps, horns, and some percussion. Many people find that they can be used for almost anything. In the studio, or when recording at home, it can be used for many things, and while it's rarely the best choice, it can make do as a snare mic or horn mic when on an extremely tight budget.

OVERALL OPINION

I've used these mics for about 8 years and have never had a problem. I like using them for live vocals mostly. They are virtually indestructible and the sound quality has never deteriorated or gotten worse. I like the versatility of them a lot as well. For someone who isn't an audiophile, or hasn't been around microphones for very long, the differences between this mic and some of its higher-end dynamic mic counterparts is barely noticeable, or sometimes not noticeable at all. For this reason, they are more than worth the price. In fact, I've yet to find a mic in their price range that even comes close. I would say that anybody who plays live, and any broke musician who wants to start recording at home would be wise to purchase at least one of these mics. They are better in groups, though, and most people end up buying a few, which is wise.

The shure sm-58 is a workhorse. While it is idea for vocals, it is good for live sound or studio sound but is most comfortable and commonly used in live settings. Pitted against the far superior EV brand, an untrained listener usually cant tell the difference. By no means is it cheaply made, these things are virtually indestructible. Working for a live sound company, I recommend them to most of my clients simply because they can withstand the carelessness of simple-minded singers, while maintaining a professional appearance and sound. I would not recommend it for studio recording if you have the choice to spring for some good studio quality mics. As far as the sm-57 goes, there is much speculation in likening it to the sm-58. The 58 is a vocal mic, the 57, designed for instruments. Listen to them for yourself.

OVERALL OPINION

The sm-58 was the first mic I ever got. Ive used it for around 7 years and I still have the first ones I ever got. Lending them to churches and bands over the years, they've been through everything imaginable and they still sound great. Having attended several classes on sound engineering, it is clear that the sm-58 is a good industry standard that never fails to deliver. I've seen it pitted against several mics and you just cant beat it for the price. Buying this mic will enshure your satisfaction.

The Shure SM58 is a dynamic microphone that can be used in either a live setting or the recording studio. While it is widely used in both situations, I have used it mostly in a live situation and have found that they are most useful in this setting because of how well built and long lasting these are. It has a sleek design that has almost become synonymous with what a live vocal mic looks like as it is perfect for holding and singing into. The SM58 is essentially the same microphone as the SM57 on the inside - the only difference is the grill on the SM58, which makes it more suitable for vocals. For this reason it has become an industry standard for live vocal mics because of their high sound quality, their sturdiness, and how cheap in price they are.

OVERALL OPINION

I've been using Shure SM58s for about seven years and boy can these things take a beating. I have seen ones that appear to have huge dents in them, but still work great. They are the top choice of a lot of touring bands as they can stand to take a beating and even if they get lost or stolen they are cheap and easily replaceable. These mics will definitley give you your moneys worth and even sound pretty great in the studio. In this price range I don't think I can find a mic that is as good or as reliable as this one. I'm Having a few SM58s around is always a good thing, no matter what you are doing musically. I recommend checking these out for live vocals or even for use in the studio. They're great all around mics brought to you by a great company with a great reputation for making high quality mics at reasonable prices.

The SM58 is a dynamic microphone. It should primarily be used for live vocals. This is the mic that you see at almost every live performance you've been to, except for maybe the higher end concerts that would have something nicer. Being a cardioid dynamic mic, it is well suited for close mic'ing an isolated source in a noisy environment (ie, stage).

Stick this mic right up to a singer's mouth and you will get minimal bleed from the other instruments on-stage. The frequency response also is tailored for this use. It has a low frequency roll-off to account for the proximity effect that will be caused by someone singing with the mic right on their lips. There is also a presence boost in its frequency response, so this should help the vocals cut through a bit better.

Additionally, the head of the mic is encased in a wire grill over some foam, so this will help to reduce the plosive sounds you'll get from a singer.

OVERALL OPINION

I've been using these since about 6 years ago. It is pretty much the standard live vocal mic. It definitely gets the job done just fine, and at an attractive price. If I had to complain, you could say the highs can be a little dull, but frankly this is less important in a live setting - you wouldn't really want to use this for recording, when a condenser mic would be best.

They are also extremely durable - I've dropped SM58's so many times and they always work just fine. And if you dent the grill on the end and you need your mics to be in pristine condition - Shure sells replacement grills. Another benefit this has is due to the fact that it's a cardiod, if you keep it faced toward the band, and behind your main PA (so that your mic never faces the fronts of the speakers) you can dramatically reduce chance of feedback, because the mic is going to reject sound source from behind it.

I've used many similar products, and at this price range, for a live vocal mic you can't go wrong. Not only would I buy it again - I have - I own a few of them. Any band who wants to start getting some of their own performance equipment should definitely invest in one or more of these mics, until such time they can afford much higher priced alternatives.