yes but I use asser hearing since the 1.5 so it's a bit subjective.
- The manual is clear and sufficient?
so great, even brilliant, adobe what.
- What is the configuration of your computer? (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Disk / sound card ..)
I have a config tite, PIV 1.7GHz 1st Gen. 512MB RAM, M-Audio Audiophile 24/96
- The software works he correctly on this configuration?
it works well niquel uses the dsp of the caret finally I think because my CPU usage is often below 40% except with reverb, delay, and bcp track (over 35) etc. ..
- This software + hardware is stable?
95% it dropped me a faith in six months, I find it reasonable
- How long have you use it?
6/7mois I know I really buy right out as usual
- What is so special that you like most and least?
Automation really well live as in 7 and the ability to expand and do what you want with the sound editing view is really powerful, I do not like the interface that eats too much room and the setting of outputs / inputs
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
No, I discovered after video production studio and I did not leave
- How would you rate the quality / price?
ba I find it a bit expensive but well worth the price are the same
- With experience, you do again this choice?
yes, I think, but the port to mac still missing
Did you find this review helpful?yesno
Oliviercool's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Like most PC software, it is easy to install thanks to its setup.
I know Adobe Audition from the beginning (at the time when it was published by Syntrillum, it was called "Cool Edit" then "Cool Edit Pro"), there is only version 2.0 that I did not known.
Top new features over version 1.5:
It supports protocol ASIO sound card drivers (unfortunately instead of input - output direct from the sound card)
Under Multitrack View, you can record MIDI notes in MIDI tracks (in version 1.5, you could that importing MIDI files)
It supports plug-ins and VST and VSTi soft synths!
It supports the ReWire protocol!
Among the new audio processing algorithms (so to Publisher), the main novelty is the phase corrector: in principle, no need to correct azimuth read heads an analog tape before scanning ^ ^
In addition to the spectral display (and the ordinary wave), two new types of displays have been added: Spectral Pan and Spectral Phase.
First, the software has allourdi to a PC Pentium 4 2.8 GHz. It is still usable but it is better DualCore a 3 GHz or equivalent.
It is then disoriented because the interface changes completely, there are even some terms that also changes in the menus and commands without the command in question has changed operation. It is therefore necessary to navigate ^ ^
But once accustomed, it is simple and very effective, at least for the audio, the MIDI, there are still improvements to make! As such, I just spent ages to find where to select the MIDI interface selected: the button in question is just outside the window "Sequencer" and as there is no scroll bar in the window I just thought that all functions were present in the window while some of them which were outside the button when the window is too small! In addition, it is impossible to complete MIDI clips or to move or the splitter (the term here is "away") in the same way that the audio clips as it is for quite a long time even in the most basic of Cubase, impossible either to specify for each clip in the same track how and what synth preset assigned to it. In fact, MIDI tracks are devoid of clips, you can make changes in the summary window sequencer track in question, but that's all, and it's a shame! In addition, we are forced to play the software in order to get along just when played on a synth just for fun or to repeat, impossible to agree to play when the software is to STOP.
And synths that are only available in standalone version, and indeed for any other application of sound, how to save them in Adobe Audition? Well, I know, most of them are arranged in VSTi synths, but only in standalone version, it does exist, I've seen. It is unfortunate that the software can take as input only the source of the sound card, impossible to source a copy of the "output" audio virtual standalone synth. Adobe Audition should have a function (or should be delivered with a utility) between the virtual audio patchbay input - output and an additional audio streaming server. For it must be remembered that in the PC world, there is no utility for the Macintosh as SoundFlow - I begin to understand why the media are facias facias of the small apple ^ ^ - apart from the Virtual Audio Cable which is not terrible (his utility "Audio Repeater" comes with add too much latency, can not play music with!) and a ReaRoute I was not able to operate, too complicated.
And since it supports plug-ins DirectX, why does he not support, time that is, the format DXi synths?
on the other hand, it has a feature that I like and that I might use it every time when I work with soft synths, it must let him because it's a big positive point is the ability to include an audio output of said synthesizer, that's deadly! Because once the project is completed and it will store, instead of archiving the project used the synths, there's only store audio tracks produced by them, and that's super .
For audio, I would put a 9 out of 10 that held out for MIDI 7 of 10, the average is between 8 10 ^ ^
For pure audio, I would not change for anything, I am in the Adobe Audition no problem ^ ^ But for MIDI, I'd have to find myself something else like software.
Did you find this review helpful?yesno
yoyotte's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Adobe Audition 3
Audiofanzine is the meeting point for Zikos for adobe audition 3, so listen to this: if you want MIDI, the vst go your way .... it is not so, be nice and everything.
If like me you're a guitarist or bass player or drum machine ...... short as you want to record real instruments, mixing tracks, mastering all with everything we need (compressor, reverb, effect of a sacred quality elsewhere) then there does not look any further this software is great, easy to access, complete background ..... a real pro stuff! I think cubase, protools ...... does not exceed 3 at hearing this kind of treatment and hearing is much more intuitive. You save your tracks in wave and make your songs qqs weeks! and after 1 year I can not tell you what I am able to do is crazy! I reach out music that sounds better than the metal bands I listened to in high school (I'm 28 years old)! Adobe compressors are really excellent chorus and reverb effects are of a quality to put you on the ass! and I do not mean the dynamic eq allow you to do crazy stuff ....... y 'tellemnt of things that if I continue I will stop over.
I record my whole band with this software and soundcard which I use a Line 6 entry jack.Avec electric drums yamaha dtx who is 7 years (which sounds completely Obselete m. ..) and a good mix on adobe (multiband compressor, reverb) I can pick up a sound downright good!
C short of the bomb! dark!
Caution, however tjs make a backup folder of your session because when you deal a lot of track with great effects (when I say really great c! Type 18 or 20 track) it may bug but very very rare c !
There hearing or Adobe bug when you treat svt c track of different size (like a track and another wav mp3 and wav and another aaf ...) is the software svt kidding. But anyway in the treatment of his tjs it is recommended to use a file type what the buzz as we gain in quality (wave file in this case c nikel)