All user reviews for the Behringer C-1

A lot of people slam Behringer gear. Most of these people don't know or comprehend the design and engineering that goes into pro audio gear. That said, the Behringer C-1 is exceptionally well designed. What happens to that design in a Chinese factory is another matter. Obviously, there are quality controls at Behringer's manufacturing facility, but occasionally you will get a lemon. Send it back. There are some really good C-1's out there. I own 3. I have Neumann's, I have Rodes, Audio Technica, and others. The C-1 is a personal favorite. I say that in part because I can use is for live performances with vocals and it sounds rich and full. Now granted, much of this is subjective and depends upon individual preferences. But I will say that I get many more compliments for vocal sound with the C-1 vs. use of my much more expensive Neumann KMS 105. This has proven to be the case time and again. The only downside I have found to the C-1 is the plastic mount. You can break it if you aren't careful and they don't sell replacements. Wish they would make it with a metal mount. Then all would be right with the world. Thanks for reading and all the best in finding your perfect sound.

What kind of mic? (for vocals, instruments, both...)
I used it to rap and for vocals... Now I use it to sing karaoke with my wife

The technology? (electret, condenser...)
Condenser, cardioid, in short a very simple mic.


OVERALL OPINION

How long have you been using it?
I used it less than a month. I tried to do the best I could with it (which is not much) but I quickly moved on to a Prodipe ST1, it's like night and day.

Did you try any of other models before buying this one?
I used a friend's home studio gear (SC600) and the differences were obvious. I then switched to an AT2020 and a ST1

Which feature do you like the most / the least?
Well, to be honest, if you are just taking up music and you don't know anything (like everybody when we start out) you are very likely to come across this mic, which is the least expensive on the market but also the one with the worst performance. Investing at least on a SM57 would be much more profitable. It sounds pretty bad, but when we are starting out and don't know much about anything, it's OK. It has a very big dip in the mids while the low mids are really boosted. The highs and lows are not even worth talking about. This mic is a disaster and the only use I have for it is to do karaoke with my wife (even though an SM57 is much more interesting) ...

How would you rate its value for money?
The least expensive on the market but also the worst, so its value for money is average

Based on your experience, would you buy this product again? ...
IMHO, it's interesting if you are just starting out to realize whether you really love making music and see if you can invest a little more in real gear. But if you asked me to buy it again now, I would most definitely NOT do it.

Behringer C1 mic to record vocals and even acoustic guitar.
Use exclusively with phantom power and anti-pop filter or say hello to distortion.

OVERALL OPINION

I've used it for four years in a mobile studio (Fostex MR8) only.
I've used SM Shure 57, 58, a prodipe too and a sennheiser.
Clear highs, sound is a bit off phase in relation to the lows, even though I notice a better reproduction in the mids.
I use it for pop rock vocals. It takes time to get the best results but I have come to really master it based on very meticulous adjustments (pop-up - mic- mouth distance), the mic's response and hardware effects.
Unbeatable value for money, especially secondhand!
Based on my experience, I recommend it when you are starting out with your home studio or want to produce songs quickly and effectively without braking your head with settings...

Large-diaphragm, condenser mic.
I bought it to record instruments (guitar and sax) in a home studio (more like a ghetto studio, actually...)

OVERALL OPINION

I had never tried another mic before this one (in a home studio).

This mic doesn't stand out due to its performance (I have made comparisons), but to be honest, it's useful. I think it's not as bad for vocals as for what I had originally intended to use it (sax and guitar).
But its price is unbeatable.

So if your budget is not very high and you want gear to learn, it's a good choice.

The biggest advantage is that the day you upgrade to better gear you clearly notice the difference!

The Behringer c 1 is a strange looking mic in my opinion. Its not very appealing at first glance, but that has nothing to do with the sound that it produces. This great unit has a well built Stainless Steel Body and Design. Very clean and precise product design with a cost effective purpose.It's made to go against more expensive mics for less. It does not require phantom power and comes with it's own power supply, cable and case. Just recently recorded with my new Focusrite ISA100 PreAmp and what you have is incredible warm vocals dialed into what you wish to achieve. It has three various switches for a wide choice of vocal recording applications. I tested this new Mic against others and it finished first having a real distinct and unique quality. Fred B the audio pro upon hearing the recording said, it was one of the best his ears ever heard!! I fully agree after many mic/song comparisons. Again, another superb investment of quality


OVERALL OPINION

After hearing all the ravs about this mic, and then hearing it in A-B comparison's with some of the most famous mics in the business I heard quickly why everyone likes it so much. After hearing the A-B tests I purchased mine and it's been a favorite ever since. Very versatile, and has a nice warm vintage sound. Very happy with it and the whole Sterling line. great products and great customer service. I put this mic right up there with some of the top quality shure mics.

The bad thing about the Behringer c 1 is that it distorts considerably when faced with high SPL vocals or if you're recoding Rhythm Acoustic guitar. The Figure of Eight position gave the best sound on Vocals, but it just wasn't smooth enough for my taste. I sent it back and am still looking for my next Mic.

Condenser microphone with phantom power.
manufacturing excellent (solid).
Supplied without cable and without suspension.
paid € 48 in MH.

The suspension costs less than € 20.

for the rest see the Behringer website

OVERALL OPINION

After recording a duet of guitar and voice with the Micro and BCM52 MacMah, I'm really surprised by the result. The general tone of the microphone is relatively warm with a small gap can be in the lower spectrum. The dynamic is very good and excellent definition at this price!

were not pro with Pro but need connoisseur with a good ear I put 10 as the value for money is excellent!

Why spend more?

- What kind of mic? (for vocals, instruments, both)
It is intended mainly to record vocals and acoustic instruments.
- What technology? (electret, condenser, etc.)
Condenser with phantom power.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you been using it?
A few months.
- Which features do you like the most / the least?
I love its precision and versatility.
- Did you try any other models before buying it?
No.
- How would you rate its value for money?
Excellent, that's what made me go for it, it's exceptional value for money.
- Based on your experience, would you choose this product again?
Yes, for sure

Solid construction that inspires confidence, and rightly so.

OVERALL OPINION

This mic just keeps on amazing me, as well as other musician I work with. I bought it a year ago on a whim, without really knowing what I would do with it, so it stayed in its case some time. Then I said to myself, "for the price, it's not a big loss if I make it explode." I usually use it to record brasses or as overhead. It has a very satisfying precision, nice round lows and crystalline mids and highs. On a sax, an instrument whose recording is as complex as it gets, at a distance of 1.5-2.5 feet, it captures the whole body of the instrument and picks up the physical presence of the keys, of the metal, the breathing of the musician, in short, all "defects" that you can mistakenly miss sticking an SM57 into the mouthpiece.

Go to Behringer's website http://www.behringer.com/C-1/

OVERALL OPINION

A nice mic with a ludicrous price. It's a Behringer, so it's obviously low-end. Live it can have a tendency to generate feedback if you are not careful. But in a home-studio, it's better. Very good as overhead, and it's also interesting on instruments, for vocals it's a debatable choice.

The mic is not precise, rather neutral (light coloration in the highs => ideal as overhead), but also cold...It lacks a bit of punch. But for the price, I'm still amazed.

It has a surprisingly solid build, but the clip included seems really feeble. It's made of plastic so I fear it will break if I tighten it too much. A shock mount could be an interesting investment.

Recommended for anyone looking for an honest, all-purpose mic with a more than interesting price. If your budget allows it, go for an AKG, Apex, Audio Technica, Shure. The difference is obvious if you get something a bit more expensive.

Rather solid condenser mic (requires phantom power) with a good packaging (transport case and adapter for suspension shock mount).
This mic can record vocals and acoustic instruments but, contrary to what is usually said about behirnger, I wouldn't use it to record an amp from too close (not less than 3ft) because I think it doesn't like high SPLs!!!

OVERALL OPINION

I've used it for a month and I must admit that I am very happy with it. It has superb dynamics and it really captures all the warmth of the guitar wood or the nuances of the vocals. Since is it active, it generates little noise and has a high output level. So, for 50 bucks there's nothing to complain about!!
A brief anecdote: One day during rehearsal, I ventured to use it to record drums, and it did a good job. It certainly needs other mics to get a fuller sound, but it does pretty good, as long as you don't use it too close to the drums!
Given the price, there's nothing for under $100 that can compete with it. But be careful, it's a studio mic, don't use it live or it will die!

Unidirectional cardioid condenser mic. Works with phantom power. Rugged mic.
Sold with plastic case and adapter for mic stand.

OVERALL OPINION

I've been using it for two months. One of the best values for money on the market, I would even say it's amazing. Awesome dynamics, lows and highs well balanced, it captures lows very good, no unwanted noises. I have tested it with several recording systems and the result has always been good. So, for me, it's a great value for money.

It's really sturdy, you can tell the excellent manufacturing quality, the same goes for the adapter and the transport case. It's a good product that can be used for anything in the studio or on stage.

I use it to record directly my vocals and guitar without any effect nor equalizer.

I use it to record vocals and acoustic guitar

OVERALL OPINION

I don't use it much. I didn't want to invest a lot on a mic that I wouldn't use much.

I used it to record the first cd of a buddy (http://www.myspace.com/garciaphone). He doesn't have the best guitar, it has a low level, so I had a very bad signal-to-noise ratio with this mic. It picked up a lot of noise.

But apart from the noise, the sound is OK. For what I use it in my projects, it's all right. I use a noise reducer to take out the noise and everything is good.

I don't regret having bought it, given the use I have for it and its price. On the other hand, if I wrote music or the recording was important (with a real singer, for example), I would definitely invest in another mic.I used it to record vocals and acoustic guitars