All user reviews for the sE Electronics sE2200A

characteristics have already been widely discussed here, but which version do we speak?

OVERALL OPINION

I bought it right out, I think it was in 2003?
I also useful Neuman TLM 103, and I have several condenser microphones of very good quality.
I am very surprised at the post board modification posted on the forum. Opening my model, I find that the quality of the electronics is much higher and extremely more careful than the pictures posted, which would tend to think that the first models were made with much more care and electronics clearly higher, probably before moving to mass production more economical.
But the question is in what year?
On mine, there is no difference in quality of components or welds with my Neuman, and it's great luxury next to what I've seen on these photos.

There would thus be two microphones marketed with the same name?

On my model, no change is necessary, the sound is excellent, the dynamics is exceptional, there is no color, powerful bass and treble are very well defined.

At the time, it cost 380 euros in, which was a bargain.

Models and newer sold for less than 200 euros, I do not know, electronics having nothing to do. It seems quite rude and sloppy, completely changed the diagram, components have become minimalist quality welds are rough, even if the capsule seems to be the same, it really speaks more of the same microphone.

Everything has been said about the characteristics.

I use it for the vocals, singing, acoustic guitar, sometimes both simultaneously. The sound is simply great, I can only recommend this mic. As a student in multimedia, I had to record some demos of songs and even with my teacher specializing in sound was impressed and asked the reference microphone.

OVERALL OPINION

That must have two years that I use. I love it and use it very often. I had not previously tried other mics (difficile. ..) but I had the micro USB T-Bone, as saying that the difference is just huge. The sound is really clear and free of noise.

The value is simply excellent, if not the best available (at least at the time). A good price for a very good microphone.

I would do this choice with your eyes closed, I have since tried other mics, including current, and mine remains my favorite.

Large diaphragm condenser microphone used for vocals, the recovery amp and acoustic instruments, large, very versatile.

OVERALL OPINION

I just bought it, and I've used for making voice sound horrible conditions, with the musicians who played at the same time. It repissait STRID in all microphones. Yet despite the cel is your exact: the voice is clear, without agressivit in acute, with the clarity is needed in the medium, and everything is in the low end. It trs good job, and what the price there is no reason to deprive yourself. For cons, I noticed that silent trs sensitive to plosives. You really have to watch the position of the source to make the most.
I think I will soon order a second, but I also try other head REFERENCE brand ....

Micro versatile, presumably for the song but also works on the recovery of acoustic instruments (guitar or cello, for example) and in an atmosphere of recovery battery or amp (at a reasonable distance though)

OVERALL OPINION

It's a microphone that I use almost every day because of its versatility. In terms of restitution, its spectrum is very broad and tend to be flattering in the extreme (low and high) is particularly audible catch votes. the low cut reduces the problem in the serious, however in acute sibilants stand out much. In addition it will not save a pop filter when recording vocals.
Provided at the value, in my opinion is an excellent micro
Having also had problems with the first model I bought (Se2200), I was changed (for Se 2200 A) and delivered to your home in record time. It's called the service department.

Condenser microphone
well finished
solid
the suspension is book and I find it very well
aluminum briefcase

a 10 db pad
a low-cut

OVERALL OPINION

I quickly test I've had 2 days
but the first moments are reassuring ..
c clear, precise uniform ...
(All have a look at the website .. see diagram)
compared with NT1 .. NT2 ATM 4030 ... .. Violet and design
I find it more homogeneous and less typ.
background noise does not exist.
and very good sensitivity.

frankly for the price I think the best c
quality report market prices.

- What kind of microphone?
Mambrane big, low-cut,-10dB pad, comes with box and aluminum suspenssion. Ideale for voice (voice fminine) and acoustic instruments.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
1 year
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The +: his precision and clarity of the voices or the voices fminines "brilliant".
The -: it saturates quickly when he returned dedant with a voice "Rock n 'Roll!" Its suspenssion is a bit fragile!
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Shure SM86, MINI SE, SE 3, AKG, AT4050
- How do you report qualitprix?
Exellent and probably concurrently!
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
Yes

For technical specifications see below or from the manufacturer.
Nevertheless, in his briefcase comes with a solid suspension (and elastic parts. You never know)

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a few days. Not need more to realize the difference with my other mics. It is clear, precise, warm, comfortable, bright ... in short, the price is downright crazy! I'm not going to compare it with other prestigious mics, but it is stunning and for me, and my ears, there are only the result counts. It's a pretty stupid, heavy, beautiful finish. Coupled with the JOEMEEK 6Q is a happy marriage! Ordered with an anti-pop (required) all for € 237 Audio-Solutions. Rebref, if you want a good all-purpose static without breaking the bank ... that's it.
Nothing is perfect in this world, but for the price / quality ratio, almost.
Note of 10/08/08: Anti pop real need for vocals. Watch out for sibilant.

- What kind of microphone? (Song, sound, mixed ..)
Condenser microphone condenser large diaphragm, making voice-oriented.
Pad-10dB / 80Hz LowCut
Comes with a bag suspension

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
About 1 year

- What is so special that you like most and least?
What I like most is that it is very easy to have a voice right without taking the head, the voice moves naturally into the mix with the microphone, the microphone against by missing a few 'sitting on some votes, over time I find the balance between bass and treble is better, it's probably the right cable I bought him. This is far from my microphone preferred because the voices are at once very air with it ... sometimes it's good but I must admit that this is not my taste is very "variety" we're well on other sources too (toms, bass in addition to a more serious, guitar percussion, atmosphere, but it is not my first choice in general.
I use it on an instrument when I need clarity or when I have nothing else, because in general it's more for the voice that I reserve, even in this use it is not micro officially appointed for me, by the way I use it more when I did not get satisfaction from a preliminary test. A preamp will go a little Fat him well I think.
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
This is my first large diaphragm static

- How would you rate the quality / price?
Really honest but not surprising either, the mic is worth its price no more no less. It is also true that I do not know a lot of higher-end large diaphragm except the 414.

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
No, I have one that's enough

purpose. particulirement a good voice. multiple recordings of guitar (acoustic, electric, bass), piano. in any case, he is doing great!

I did not find a default ...

OVERALL OPINION

I have 3 years. when I bought it I do not know much. we can say that I am well sacrment tomb. because since I worked with many other mics (Shure KSM 27, Prodipe Lamp Studio Pro ...) on a variety of configurations (with no prampli lamp, through a mixing desk or direct on the sound card). This micro is doing wonderfully. Sincrement. I do not see the intrt to tens or hundreds of dollars more for a microphone that gives amlioration hardly noticeable. must pass the microphones over 1000 euros to change the CATEGORY and feel a diffrence.

sincrement. I have no praise the intrt MRIT this microphone, I'm just sr in its class in price, it has no competitor ...