sE2200A classified ad
Alerte nouvelle annonceImages
Reviews
4.5/5(12 reviews)
58 %
33 %
8 %
Write a user review
R-skillzSE 2200a review
Published on 07/25/11 at 09:21The se 2200a is a condenser studio recording microphone.
The se 2200a has a low cut filter, 10dB pad and also comes complete with a very rugged aluminium shock mount and flight case.
Frequency Response: 20Hz-20KHz
Polar Pattern: Cardioid
OVERALL OPINION
I like the fresh sound the mic gives when recording vocals, and it leaves the voice of the rapper/singer in its natural sound.
I think the se 2200a gives the best quality you can get for its price, and i would really recommend it for recording rap vocals.
The se 2200a has a low cut filter, 10dB pad and also comes complete with a very rugged aluminium shock mount and flight case.
Frequency Response: 20Hz-20KHz
Polar Pattern: Cardioid
OVERALL OPINION
I like the fresh sound the mic gives when recording vocals, and it leaves the voice of the rapper/singer in its natural sound.
I think the se 2200a gives the best quality you can get for its price, and i would really recommend it for recording rap vocals.
00
»
bazzzoukkPublished on 10/15/12 at 07:30 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
characteristics have already been widely discussed here, but which version do we speak?
OVERALL OPINION
I bought it right out, I think it was in 2003?
I also useful Neuman TLM 103, and I have several condenser microphones of very good quality.
I am very surprised at the post board modification posted on the forum. Opening my model, I find that the quality of the electronics is much higher and extremely more careful than the pictures posted, which would tend to think that the first models were made with much more care and electronics clearly higher, probably before moving to mass production more economical.
But the question is in what year?
On mine, there is no difference in...…
OVERALL OPINION
I bought it right out, I think it was in 2003?
I also useful Neuman TLM 103, and I have several condenser microphones of very good quality.
I am very surprised at the post board modification posted on the forum. Opening my model, I find that the quality of the electronics is much higher and extremely more careful than the pictures posted, which would tend to think that the first models were made with much more care and electronics clearly higher, probably before moving to mass production more economical.
But the question is in what year?
On mine, there is no difference in...…
Read more
characteristics have already been widely discussed here, but which version do we speak?
OVERALL OPINION
I bought it right out, I think it was in 2003?
I also useful Neuman TLM 103, and I have several condenser microphones of very good quality.
I am very surprised at the post board modification posted on the forum. Opening my model, I find that the quality of the electronics is much higher and extremely more careful than the pictures posted, which would tend to think that the first models were made with much more care and electronics clearly higher, probably before moving to mass production more economical.
But the question is in what year?
On mine, there is no difference in quality of components or welds with my Neuman, and it's great luxury next to what I've seen on these photos.
There would thus be two microphones marketed with the same name?
On my model, no change is necessary, the sound is excellent, the dynamics is exceptional, there is no color, powerful bass and treble are very well defined.
At the time, it cost 380 euros in, which was a bargain.
Models and newer sold for less than 200 euros, I do not know, electronics having nothing to do. It seems quite rude and sloppy, completely changed the diagram, components have become minimalist quality welds are rough, even if the capsule seems to be the same, it really speaks more of the same microphone.
OVERALL OPINION
I bought it right out, I think it was in 2003?
I also useful Neuman TLM 103, and I have several condenser microphones of very good quality.
I am very surprised at the post board modification posted on the forum. Opening my model, I find that the quality of the electronics is much higher and extremely more careful than the pictures posted, which would tend to think that the first models were made with much more care and electronics clearly higher, probably before moving to mass production more economical.
But the question is in what year?
On mine, there is no difference in quality of components or welds with my Neuman, and it's great luxury next to what I've seen on these photos.
There would thus be two microphones marketed with the same name?
On my model, no change is necessary, the sound is excellent, the dynamics is exceptional, there is no color, powerful bass and treble are very well defined.
At the time, it cost 380 euros in, which was a bargain.
Models and newer sold for less than 200 euros, I do not know, electronics having nothing to do. It seems quite rude and sloppy, completely changed the diagram, components have become minimalist quality welds are rough, even if the capsule seems to be the same, it really speaks more of the same microphone.
See less
162
»
PiscesIscariotPublished on 03/20/12 at 17:03 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Everything has been said about the characteristics.
I use it for the vocals, singing, acoustic guitar, sometimes both simultaneously. The sound is simply great, I can only recommend this mic. As a student in multimedia, I had to record some demos of songs and even with my teacher specializing in sound was impressed and asked the reference microphone.
OVERALL OPINION
That must have two years that I use. I love it and use it very often. I had not previously tried other mics (difficile. ..) but I had the micro USB T-Bone, as saying that the difference is just huge. The sound is really clear and free of noise.
The value is simply excellent, if not the best available (at least at...…
I use it for the vocals, singing, acoustic guitar, sometimes both simultaneously. The sound is simply great, I can only recommend this mic. As a student in multimedia, I had to record some demos of songs and even with my teacher specializing in sound was impressed and asked the reference microphone.
OVERALL OPINION
That must have two years that I use. I love it and use it very often. I had not previously tried other mics (difficile. ..) but I had the micro USB T-Bone, as saying that the difference is just huge. The sound is really clear and free of noise.
The value is simply excellent, if not the best available (at least at...…
Read more
Everything has been said about the characteristics.
I use it for the vocals, singing, acoustic guitar, sometimes both simultaneously. The sound is simply great, I can only recommend this mic. As a student in multimedia, I had to record some demos of songs and even with my teacher specializing in sound was impressed and asked the reference microphone.
OVERALL OPINION
That must have two years that I use. I love it and use it very often. I had not previously tried other mics (difficile. ..) but I had the micro USB T-Bone, as saying that the difference is just huge. The sound is really clear and free of noise.
The value is simply excellent, if not the best available (at least at the time). A good price for a very good microphone.
I would do this choice with your eyes closed, I have since tried other mics, including current, and mine remains my favorite.
I use it for the vocals, singing, acoustic guitar, sometimes both simultaneously. The sound is simply great, I can only recommend this mic. As a student in multimedia, I had to record some demos of songs and even with my teacher specializing in sound was impressed and asked the reference microphone.
OVERALL OPINION
That must have two years that I use. I love it and use it very often. I had not previously tried other mics (difficile. ..) but I had the micro USB T-Bone, as saying that the difference is just huge. The sound is really clear and free of noise.
The value is simply excellent, if not the best available (at least at the time). A good price for a very good microphone.
I would do this choice with your eyes closed, I have since tried other mics, including current, and mine remains my favorite.
See less
10
»
MaqmanPublished on 11/30/05 at 03:14 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Trs good condenser mic for vocals, amp cover, acoustic instruments.
OVERALL OPINION
I have used it for a year and a half.
-Good times for amp, voice. Attention to acoustic instruments like a guitar, the microphone moves away must be at least 30cm, the microphone is sensitive and trs trs (too?) Dfine.
-I had a large diaphragm microphone, the report quality price attracted me.
-I 'Achteras 2 for a couple ...
OVERALL OPINION
I have used it for a year and a half.
-Good times for amp, voice. Attention to acoustic instruments like a guitar, the microphone moves away must be at least 30cm, the microphone is sensitive and trs trs (too?) Dfine.
-I had a large diaphragm microphone, the report quality price attracted me.
-I 'Achteras 2 for a couple ...
00
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: sE Electronics
- Model: sE2200A
- Category: Large diaphragm condenser microphones
- Added in our database on: 10/18/2004
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Manuals and other files
Other categories in Condenser Microphones
Other names: s e2200a, se 2200a, se2200 a, 2200 a, , se2200a, se 2200 a, se2200 a