The T.bone SC600

This is a very good ideal microphone for a small home studio.
Delicate and light, it can make good recordings in his bedroom.
Obviously, because it is sensitive, you can expect a return of ambient noise on your track if your room is not acoustically isolated and if you have trouble balancing your equalizer. Anti-pop barrier is also advised, if you have a bad dog treat your computer consonants.
Let us finally on the fact that it is a microphone for voice but I also use it to help me to save some instruments such as tambourines or an acoustic guitar.

OVERALL OPINION

I use this mic for a good year.
This is the first micro semi-pro I acquire.
It is small and easy to handle.
Price / quality ratio, it is a good acquisition.
I am satisfied with my choice.

Micro which seems mainly directed me to the song, although I admit never having tried it on another source. It has two directional and low cut.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 3 months now, tested on a male voice and a female voice. The rendering is very decent for this price range, the microphone remains neutral while adding a slight warmth to the voice (I like it after that is only my opinion). I stay here because I am recovering slowly at home studio and I lack comparison. I obviously implies that there must be much better, but not at that price.
A negative point however, the selectors directivity and low cut are too sensitive and can change position easily without anyone noticing. Therefore must be monitored, especially if the singer pawed the microphone.

Condenser microphone with a choice of direction (cardioid, hyper cardio etc) and low cut

OVERALL OPINION

Used for 2 years. I also have an  AKG C414 B-XL2 and have worked with neumann mics in the studio. My opinion is that for the price, this is an ideal microphone! It can certainly compete with professional microphones up to the cost of1000 €.
T-Bone SC-600 (150 €) VS AKG C-414 XLII (1000 €) Think about it.
I compared the boards and tested it from every angle, and the AKG did not win the test as easily as I expected it to. However, I love the AKG, and, for me, is one of the best mics of all time, but was surprised at how much significant difference there is . Of course, I'm talking about lead voice taken close to the source. Because it is when trying to capture the reverberation of a room, or fine soundscapes, the t-bone is less versitile, less natural.
The +:
Versatility-
Price-
-Sound Quality
The -:
Light-colored (heat)
-Respect dynamics (compared to micro pro)
Fragile-
Here, the micro m'à been advised and I advised myself to friends, because it is a purchase I have never regretted it. I've never had negative feedback.
Usually I'm not really a fan of stuff like this, I would call "consumable" (short-lived), but on the spot I recommend.

I use it primarily for vocals, but also for acoustic guitar, bass amplifier recovery ... He served at all to record the album in my group very good result!

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 6 months, and I am very happy.
Compared to the Rode NT1, it is "lightweight" in the treble but the high pass filter makes me prefer for low voices, but if it is not so hot ...

For the price, quality is bluffing.

Now I have a Rode NT1, so I only used occasionally, but that I would definitely do it again this election ...