View other reviews for this product:
Hallyd
Published on 08/21/08 at 20:09
Gibson Les Paul (USA)
21 boxes and two micro Burstbucker Pro
2 volumes and 2 tones a 3 position selector
AA Scult mahogany table, maple neck 60s'
UTILIZATION
Good departing somewhat above as access to acute frankly were not that great of a pass because Ibanez SC 620 has a Les Paul are not ben living Ibanez photo for access to acute and then ben ben working a little more concerns after finding how to place my hand in terms of weight bin is true that it's still heavy but with a good strap wide and well padded too much trouble for me for the weight! I say 9 / 10 but only for the weight and perhaps for access to acute because it is true that starting is not very simple.
SOUNDS
As for the style of bin zic it has its place because I play blues, rock, pop and also from hard rock to hard but I still prefer my Ibanez SC 620 is equipped with Fred / Paf pro me asked why the Ibanez rather than my Les Paul because it's my ears tell me that it looks better that mean it's an opinion that is only my opinion! like a Marshall amp I 59 SPL Hendrix reissue plexi box on a 4 * December 1960 AV for me really the top of the top in terms of effects I use a Vox Tonelab LE, but I do not use any amp simulation Regarding the sound it obtiends sound very fat but a little less I find that with the old configuration was an easel with T498 and R490 in a round, but beware that hard anyway!
OVERALL OPINION
I recently and I can say that I love everything about this now since my scratching problem of access to high frequencies are ancient history and the weight I do not really dérrange.
The value for money bin is always too expensive but it's a Les Paul so I do not plainds!
And if it again without a doubt I would do this choice!
21 boxes and two micro Burstbucker Pro
2 volumes and 2 tones a 3 position selector
AA Scult mahogany table, maple neck 60s'
UTILIZATION
Good departing somewhat above as access to acute frankly were not that great of a pass because Ibanez SC 620 has a Les Paul are not ben living Ibanez photo for access to acute and then ben ben working a little more concerns after finding how to place my hand in terms of weight bin is true that it's still heavy but with a good strap wide and well padded too much trouble for me for the weight! I say 9 / 10 but only for the weight and perhaps for access to acute because it is true that starting is not very simple.
SOUNDS
As for the style of bin zic it has its place because I play blues, rock, pop and also from hard rock to hard but I still prefer my Ibanez SC 620 is equipped with Fred / Paf pro me asked why the Ibanez rather than my Les Paul because it's my ears tell me that it looks better that mean it's an opinion that is only my opinion! like a Marshall amp I 59 SPL Hendrix reissue plexi box on a 4 * December 1960 AV for me really the top of the top in terms of effects I use a Vox Tonelab LE, but I do not use any amp simulation Regarding the sound it obtiends sound very fat but a little less I find that with the old configuration was an easel with T498 and R490 in a round, but beware that hard anyway!
OVERALL OPINION
I recently and I can say that I love everything about this now since my scratching problem of access to high frequencies are ancient history and the weight I do not really dérrange.
The value for money bin is always too expensive but it's a Les Paul so I do not plainds!
And if it again without a doubt I would do this choice!