All user reviews of 4/5 for the Gibson Les Paul Studio

The Gibson Les Paul Studio is widely known as a very stripped down but still great sounding version of the venerable Les Paul guitar. Many of the core features are still the same such as the mahogany body and neck, the maple top, the dual humbuckers and the Gibson craftsmanship in the good ol' US of A. It features a mahogany body, mahogany neck, an arched maple cap, an EBONY fretboard with trapezoid inlays, Kluson tuners, a tune-o-matic bridge with stopbar tailpiece, dual Gibson humbuckers (490R/498T or Burstbucker Pros depending on the model), and the typical Les Paul cosmetics and construction, minus binding. Though the lack of cosmetics may be a turn off for some, the stripped down ethos and lower price tag of the Studio make it a viable option for many younger players who want the real deal but can't swing $2,000+ for a new Standard. This guitar features an ebony fretboard which is a cool change, offering a slightly brighter and harder tone than the rosewood. Plus it looks just like Randy Rhoads!






UTILIZATION

All in all the design of the Les Paul Studio is really simplistic and to the point, which helps to create a pure and true sounding Les Paul for not a whole lotta dosh. Since 2006 they've been chambered and this causes them to be much lighter and easier to hold for longer periods of time. The resulting tonal change makes the guitar sound a bit more akin to a hollowbody like a Gibson ES335, which some players may or may not like. The neck is a beefy but manageable '50s fat profile, perfect for really digging in and grabbing notes by the skin of their teeth.

Getting a good sound out of this guitar is simple enough. Gibsons don't have or offer a whole lot of different switching or control options... it's two humbuckers. So as a result you're getting a only a select few tones. The pickups suit a wide variety of styles from jazz to metal and they work quite well in this guitar. Like I stated above, the ebony fretboard of this guitar helps to change the sound somewhat. It's a bit more like an LP Custom (a bit brighter and not quite as warm sounding) as opposed to the Standard, which is a cool change.

SOUNDS

I've tried this guitar with a few different Fender and Mesa Boogie amplifiers. It is a fairly versatile guitar considering the limited switching options that you get. The neck pickup works really well for clean jazzier tones or some early Cream esque bluesy goodness. The combination of two pickups provides some hints of Fender tones overall... while it's not quite a Tele, it has that sort of idea behind it if you dial it in right. The bridge pickup is fairly bright and it works very well for many rock rhythm and lead, both clean and distorted. I've heard these guitars with both the 490/498s and the BB Pros and they both work very well in this guitar tonally. This guitar works for that slightly heavier tone that LP Customs are known for as well because it's very similar feature wise (minus the binding).


OVERALL OPINION

All in all I think the Gibson Les Paul Studio is a wise choice for anyone looking for a great Les Paul with the feel and tone of the higher end models on a budget. They're about $1,300 new which is a good price considering the value to quality ratio on a guitar like this. It comes with a nice Gibson USA hardcase as well. I personally prefer the unchambered Les Pauls myself, but it's all a matter of opinion. I prefer this model over other Studios and the combination of the white finish with gold and ebony makes it really classy.

The Gibson Les Paul Studio came about in the 1980s as a lower priced, slightly stripped down version of the famed Les Paul Standard. Many of the core features are still the same such as the mahogany body and neck, the maple top, the dual humbuckers and the Gibson craftsmanship in the good ol' US of A. It features a mahogany body, mahogany neck, an arched maple cap, a rosewood fretboard with trapezoid inlays, Kluson tuners, a tune-o-matic bridge with stopbar tailpiece, dual Gibson humbuckers (490R/498T or Burstbucker Pros depending on the model), and the typical Les Paul cosmetics and construction, minus binding. Though the lack of cosmetics may be a turn off for some, the stripped down ethos and lower price tag of the Studio make it a viable option for many younger players who want the real deal but can't swing $2,000+ for a new Standard.

UTILIZATION

All in all the design of the Les Paul Studio is really simplistic and to the point, which helps to create a pure and true sounding Les Paul for not a whole lotta dosh. Since 2006 they've been chambered and this causes them to be much lighter and easier to hold for longer periods of time. The resulting tonal change makes the guitar sound a bit more akin to a hollowbody like a Gibson ES335, which some players may or may not like. The neck is a beefy but manageable '50s fat profile, perfect for really digging in and grabbing notes by the skin of their teeth.

Getting a good sound out of this guitar is simple enough. Gibsons don't have or offer a whole lot of different switching or control options... it's two humbuckers. So as a result you're getting a only a select few tones. The pickups suit a wide variety of styles from jazz to metal and they work quite well in this guitar.

SOUNDS

I've tried this guitar with various Fender and Mesa Boogie amplifiers. It is a fairly versatile guitar considering the limited switching options that you get. The neck pickup works really well for clean jazzier tones or some early Cream esque bluesy goodness. The combination of two pickups provides some hints of Fender tones overall... while it's not quite a Tele, it has that sort of idea behind it if you dial it in right. The bridge pickup is fairly bright and it works very well for many rock rhythm and lead, both clean and distorted. I've heard these guitars with both the 490/498s and the BB Pros and they both work very well in this guitar tonally.

OVERALL OPINION

All in all I think the Gibson Les Paul Studio is a wise choice for anyone looking for a great Les Paul with the feel and tone of the higher end models on a budget. They're about $1,300 new which is a good price considering the value to quality ratio on a guitar like this. It comes with a nice Gibson USA hardcase as well. I personally prefer the unchambered Les Pauls myself, but it's all a matter of opinion.

Gibson offers several ranges of the Les Paul series guitars for the professional guitarist as well as the budget consumer guitarist. they have a vast range of Les Paul's for exotic looks as well as pretty bare-bones guitars. This is going to be one of those bare-bones Gibson Les Paul petards.

This is Gibson Les Paul studio guitar which is the bottom as far as the price point goes. They're fairly inexpensive and they can come under well under $1000. That is a good intro price for someone who wants to step up to it good les Paul tone. These guitars are built out of mahogany wood most times with a rosewood fretboard.

UTILIZATION

These guitars are fairly easy to dial in and basically just crank up the volume on both channels I should say both pick ups and the volume knobs ups and the tone controls up to 10 as well. You have two volume controls and you have two tone control knobs as well as a pick up selector at the top of the guitar. It comes with the rosewood fretboard with the nice block pearl inlay for the frets. And you have a black headstock with the nice logo with Gibson at the top.

SOUNDS


The studio Gibson Les Paul guitar is a general Les Paul tone. It will get you just about any Les Paul tone that you've ever heard, but the feel of the guitar will be a little bit different than a standard Gibson Les Paul or even a custom Gibson Les Paul. There isn't much change in tone from guitar to guitar unless the top is changed. And what I mean by that, is that some of the standard plus Gibson Les Paul's will have a quilted or fingered maple top which balances out the mahogany wood a little bit better.

I generally like these guitars with a Mesa boogie or a Marshall amplifier. These guitars really come into their own with a good high gain amplifier more so than they would with a clean amplifier such as a fender twin reverb. They don't sound as good to my ears with the clean amps as much as they do with the gainey distorted amplifier.

OVERALL OPINION


You can find these guitars new for right around $799. That is a pretty good price for an entry-level Gibson Les Paul guitar. This is an all mahogany guitar with the Rosewood fretboard and have a good solid rock 'n roll tone. The guitar doesn't clean up as well as a Fender guitar would so these are going to be the guitars I would match with a Fender amp as much as I would high gain amplifier. I highly recommend this guitar if you're looking to get into a Gibson Les Paul and you have a budget under $1000.

This Gibson Les Paul is more of a studio type series guitar from Gibson and has a tight and thirsty tone. This guitar I think is all mahogany and there's no maple on the top which doesn't help with taming the overall meatiness of this guitar. The guitar itself. It's pretty nice to look at its ebony or black paint job finish and it has a rosewood fretboard and the matching black headstock with pretty average Gibson pickups installed in both the bridge in the neck. Overall it's an okay guitar, it's nothing to write home about but it'll do the job if you can get a good deal on it.

UTILIZATION

The tone of this guitar is pretty standard for Les Paul's. It's nothing spectacular but it's right in the range of a normal Les Paul tone. This is a pretty easy guitar to use if you've ever played a Gibson guitar before. It has two volume control knobs as well as two tone control knobs. In addition it also has a pick up selector on the top part portion of the guitar itself. A normal six string guitar and it does an okay job at drop tunings but it won't give you those highs that you've looking for if you have a Gibson Les Paul with the maple top on it.

SOUNDS

The tone is very studio quality in reference to the Gibson Les Paul studio guitars. They have a decent feel but not compared to the standards or the custom Gibson Les Paul guitars. The tone overall is pretty thick and not as balances as a custom or Standard with a nice fingered or quilted maple top.

I generally like the tone of the studio Gibson Les Paul with Mesa boogie dual rectifier amplifier. We have one in the band with this guitar and it sounded pretty decent for what he could do and it did the job that it was intended for.

OVERALL OPINION


These guitars you can find pretty easily on a use market and in classifieds. I highly suggested if you can get one for right around $7-$900. Gibson now is selling studio get Les Paul's for right at $800 new so that's another option aside from this one. It's a great guitar and it's fairly inexpensive guitar and it does the job quite well in my opinion.

The Studios are the guitars that are a bit more on the budget side, and considering some of the build quality on these, it's not really a surprise. The main difference between this and the regular Les Paul is that this doesn't have a maple top, and it lacks binding. The guitar features a mahogany body, mahogany neck with a rosewood fretboard, 22 frets, trapezoid inlays, pickguard, no binding, hard tail bridge, two humbuckers, two volumes, two tones and a three way switch.

UTILIZATION

These guitars can really vary depending on what time of day they were made, how the luthiers were feeling, etc. This guitar had a few of the common issues that I usually find with these. The nut itself wasn't cut deep enough, and it was causing the strings to snag every time you bent a note. The frets themselves were fairly level, but the edges were a touch sharp. A quick filing with the triangle file should fix that no problem. Aside from that, the rest of the guitar was put together fairly nicely, although it was slightly heavy in terms of overall weight.

SOUNDS

The guitar didn't sound quite as good as a normal Les Paul, and I have a feeling that a lot of that can be contributed to A) the fact that this thing weighed quite a bit (dead weight which means a lack of resonance) and B) the fact that there's no maple top on this. These two things really define that standard Les Paul tone, and once they're missing, you get something that's a bit...different. It's not the worst sound in the world, but it's just not something that I'm looking for while searching for Les Pauls. The pickups in this were average and nothing to really write home about.

OVERALL OPINION

If you're going to get one of these, be sure to play through quite a few and find the one with the least amount of flaws. Also, make sure it's not too heavy and resonates nicely. There are some great players out there, but you have to hunt through them a bit to find the perfect one.

The Studios are the guitars that are a bit more on the budget side, and considering some of the build quality on these, it's not really a surprise. The main difference between this and the regular Les Paul is that this doesn't have a maple top, and it lacks binding. The guitar features a mahogany body, mahogany neck with a rosewood fretboard, 22 frets, trapezoid inlays, pickguard, no binding, hard tail bridge, two humbuckers, two volumes, two tones and a three way switch.

UTILIZATION

These guitars can really vary depending on what time of day they were made, how the luthiers were feeling, etc. This guitar had a few of the common issues that I usually find with these. The nut itself wasn't cut deep enough, and it was causing the strings to snag every time you bent a note. The frets themselves were fairly level, but the edges were a touch sharp. A quick filing with the triangle file should fix that no problem. Aside from that, the rest of the guitar was put together fairly nicely, although it was slightly heavy in terms of overall weight.

SOUNDS

The guitar didn't sound quite as good as a normal Les Paul, and I have a feeling that a lot of that can be contributed to A) the fact that this thing weighed quite a bit (dead weight which means a lack of resonance) and B) the fact that there's no maple top on this. These two things really define that standard Les Paul tone, and once they're missing, you get something that's a bit...different. It's not the worst sound in the world, but it's just not something that I'm looking for while searching for Les Pauls. The pickups in this were average and nothing to really write home about.

OVERALL OPINION

If you're going to get one of these, be sure to play through quite a few and find the one with the least amount of flaws. Also, make sure it's not too heavy and resonates nicely. There are some great players out there, but you have to hunt through them a bit to find the perfect one.

I have always been a fan of the Gibson Les Paul guitars. Some of them can be hit or miss thought at times, but overall when you get a good one you fall in love with it and never get rid of it. These are great guitars when you get a solid one. Buying off the internet won't necessarily get you a good one. I would suggest playing one before buying.


Les Paul Studio Features:

Color: Wine Red
Top: Carved maple
Back: Mahogany
Neck: Mahogany with 1959 rounded profile
Fingerboard: Rosewood with pearloid trapezoid inlays
Number of frets: 22
Pickups: 490R (neck); 498T (bridge)
Controls: Two each tone and volume with three-way pickup selector switch
Machine heads: Green Keys
Hardware: Chrome plated

UTILIZATION

Details
Body Material Mahogany, Chambered
Top Material Maple
Body Finish Nitrocellulose
Color Wine Red
Neck Material Mahogany, Set
Neck Shape '59 Rounded
Scale Length 24-3/4"
Fingerboard Material Rosewood, 12" Radius
Fingerboard Inlay Pearloid Trapezoids
Number of Frets 22
Nut Width 1-11/16""
Bridge/Tailpiece Tune-O-Matic Nashville/Stop Bar
Tuners Grover Green Keys
Number of Pickups 2
Neck Pickup Burstbucker Pro Alnico Humbucker
Middle Pickup No Middle Pickup
Bridge Pickup Burstbucker Pro Alnico Humbucker
Controls 2 x Volume, 2 x Tone, 3-way Pickup Toggle
Case Included Gig Bag

SOUNDS

This is a player's guitar. This guitar is not a showroom quality of custom piece, but rather a good gigging guitar and a cheaper intro guitar into the Gibson Les Paul world. You can get a decent tone out of this thing. It is chambered so there is going to be something missing in the tone if you have played non-chambered Les Paul for any given amount of time.

These guitars sound great when coupled with a good Marshall style voiced amp or even a solid sounding older UK made Vox. I love the tone you can get with a good beefy Les Paul and a nice Vox Ac30. Use a nice booster pedal or a tube screamer and you will get some solid classic rock tones. Slap a good sounding analog delay in there and you will get a solid sustaining tone that will be fitting for most musical styles.

OVERALL OPINION

At new you can pick these guitars up for right at around $1320. Not a bad price for the intro to Gibson Les Paul guitars. This is a third of the price for a custom one and half the price of a standard one. It is double the price for a faded series studio so there are some even cheaper than this. I would recommend getting an older one as I don't particularly care for the chambered sound.

The ebony look on the Gibson Les Paul is a very classic look and one of the most recognizable colors that you would see on a Les Paul. I am not a fan of the look of this guitar. The Gibson Les Paul has such a unique soul and when you strike a note you just feel the resonance and vibe that can only be an LP. The black look is just too plain for me. I like the look of a Goldtop LP the best but many other like the vintage white and quilted top are some of the best looking Gibson's made. This black ebony just does't give me the look that I think matches the soul of a Gibson Les Paul.

Les Paul Studio Features:

* Color: Ebony
* Top: Carved maple
* Back: Mahogany
* Neck: Mahogany with 1959 rounded profile
* Fingerboard: Rosewood with pearloid trapezoid inlays
* Number of frets: 22
* Pickups: Two humbucking pickups with Alnico magnets
* Controls: Two each tone and volume with three-way pickup selector switch
* Machine heads: Green Keys
* Hardware: Chrome plated

UTILIZATION

Detail
Body Material Mahogany
Top Material Maple
Body Finish Nitrocellulose
Color Ebony
Neck Material Mahogany, Set
Neck Shape '59 Rounded
Scale Length 24-3/4"
Fingerboard Material Rosewood, 12" Radius
Fingerboard Inlay Pearloid Trapezoids
Number of Frets 22
Nut Width 1-11/16"
Bridge/Tailpiece Tune-O-Matic/Stop Bar
Tuners Grover Green Keys
Number of Pickups 2
Neck Pickup 490R Alnico Humbucker
Middle Pickup No middle pickup
Bridge Pickup 498T Alnico Humbucker
Controls 2 x Volume, 2 x Tone, 3-way Pickup Toggle
Case Included Hardshell

SOUNDS

The tone on these guitars don't vary too much. The ebony won't sound any different than the alpine white or the faded cherry, but these guitars do vary in feel from one another. I can't tell you how many times I have walked into a music shop and pickup about 5 or 6 Gibson Les Paul's and each one feels completely different from one another. That is the problem with buying a Les Paul is that so many other them sound good and so many of them feel good but getting one to sound good and feel good can be a task. I would never buy this guitar or any other Gibson Les Paul off the internet or without playing it first. Each one comes of the production line a little different from the one before it. So I wold suggest playing the guitar first before you buy. So many guitar hit the classifieds very quickly form people blind buying these guitars. There are enough of these guitars out there to try before you buy.

OVERALL OPINION

You can pick these guitars up new for right around $1320, which isn't a bad price for a new Gibson Les Paul. These guitars are very good entry point for a Gibson Les Paul. The custom will cost more than double this price and the standards will cost at least double the price of this guitar. So this will get you into the game. Still not cheap but other than the faded version that cost $799 this is the only way to go.

If you are in the market for a Gibson Les Paul Studio then you want to spend as least as you can to get that Les Paul tone. If you absolutely need a color then you will pay almost double the price. If you don't care what the look of this guitar is, then I would suggest the faded version which come in right at around $799. Where the painted ones come in at $1300+. This is a player's guitar and at this price it is still good for a Gibson Les Paul.


Gibson Les Paul Studio Solid body Electric Guitar Features:


* Carved maple top over a mahogany body gives you authentic Les Paul sound and feel
* '50s-profile mahogany neck with luscious ebony fingerboard plays like butter
* Two Alnico magnet humbuckers give you original PAF tone, with a slight upper-midrange boost
* Pearloid trapezoid inlays give your Les Paul Studio that authentic LP vibe
* Durable Nitro finish feels great and gives your axe stunning good looks
* Crafted by Gibson in the USA

UTILIZATION

Details
Body Material Mahogany
Top Material Maple
Body Finish Nitrocellulose
Color Alpine White
Neck Material Mahogany, Set
Neck Shape '59 Rounded
Scale Length 24-3/4"
Fingerboard Material Rosewood, 12" Radius
Fingerboard Inlay Pearloid Trapezoids
Number of Frets 22
Nut Width 1-11/16"
Bridge/Tailpiece Tune-O-Matic/Stop Bar
Tuners Grover Green Keys
Number of Pickups 2
Neck Pickup 490R Alnico Humbucker
Middle Pickup No middle pickup
Bridge Pickup 498T Alnico Humbucker
Controls 2 x Volume, 2 x Tone, 3-way Pickup Toggle
Case Included Hardshell

SOUNDS

These necks are pretty beefy. So if you like the feel of the 50's neck or just a thick neck then you will jive with the feel of this guitar. I prefer the feel of a Gibson Les Paul with the 60's profile style neck. So this neck is a little too much for my hands but its is still a good feeling guitar. I love the way the Gibson Les Paul feels and dos even though I am partial to the 60's neck I still like the feel of this guitar.

The tone of this guitar is very nice like most Les Pauls. This guitar is chambered which I hate and fee it is a cheap out for Gibson to make guitars with a sub standard built quality. I think Les Pauls sound the n=best with a Marshall voiced amp. I love the way they feel and respond to the voicing of a Plexi or an 800 style amp. They just blend perfectly together.

OVERALL OPINION

At new you can pick these guitars up right at around $1320, which is a great price for a Gibson Les Paul. I would suggest getting the faded studios ans they come in at around $799. So you will save a good chunk of money of you don't mind the bare wood look. This is a cool looking guitar with the white alpine look. I love white LP's as they just have a cool vibe to the paint job.

The Les Paul Studio is always one of those guitars that a lot of people tend to stay away from as it lacks the true construction that a normal Les Paul has. I tend to agree, but these are still pretty solid, especially for their used prices. The guitar features a mahogany body, mahogany neck with a rosewood fretboard, 22 frets, trapezoid inlays, pickguard, no binding, hard tail bridge, two humbuckers, two volumes, two tones and a three way switch.

UTILIZATION

These guitars seem to be built fairly nice, but I experienced some fretwork issues on a few that were in the store. Gibson still has some QC issues, so you really need to play all of these before ultimately buying them. The good thing is that they were all fairly resonant sounding. That means that any fretwork issues or nut issues can usually be corrected by a competent luthier without too much of a hassle.


SOUNDS

This guitar actually had EMGs installed in it, so I'll be going by those instead of the standard pickups. The guitar had an EMG 81 in the bridge and an EMG 85 in the neck. The 81 in the bridge sounded thick, but it had enough bite to cut through without a problem. It worked awesome for metal tones; in fact, it was crushing. I was really surprised how nice it sounded. The 85 in the neck was super thick and worked awesome for those legato and shred leads. The clean tones were pretty awful on these, but that's fairly typical with EMGs. However, since it's geared towards metal, the clean tone doesn't really matter that much.

OVERALL OPINION

If you swap the pickups in these models, you can get a super fat sounding guitar. It won't have that top end sparkle that the normal Les Paul has, but some people like the darker tone of the all mahogany models. It really depends on what you're going for, but I find that these can be pretty solid if you find one used in good condition. Just be sure to check the frest and nut as those'll be your biggest issue.

The Les Paul Studio is always one of those guitars that a lot of people tend to stay away from as it lacks the true construction that a normal Les Paul has. I tend to agree, but these are still pretty solid, especially for their used prices. The guitar features a mahogany body, mahogany neck with a rosewood fretboard, 22 frets, trapezoid inlays, pickguard, no binding, hard tail bridge, two humbuckers, two volumes, two tones and a three way switch.

UTILIZATION

These guitars seem to be built fairly nice, but I experienced some fretwork issues on a few that were in the store. Gibson still has some QC issues, so you really need to play all of these before ultimately buying them. The good thing is that they were all fairly resonant sounding. That means that any fretwork issues or nut issues can usually be corrected by a competent luthier without too much of a hassle.


SOUNDS

This guitar actually had EMGs installed in it, so I'll be going by those instead of the standard pickups. The guitar had an EMG 81 in the bridge and an EMG 85 in the neck. The 81 in the bridge sounded thick, but it had enough bite to cut through without a problem. It worked awesome for metal tones; in fact, it was crushing. I was really surprised how nice it sounded. The 85 in the neck was super thick and worked awesome for those legato and shred leads. The clean tones were pretty awful on these, but that's fairly typical with EMGs. However, since it's geared towards metal, the clean tone doesn't really matter that much.

OVERALL OPINION

If you swap the pickups in these models, you can get a super fat sounding guitar. It won't have that top end sparkle that the normal Les Paul has, but some people like the darker tone of the all mahogany models. It really depends on what you're going for, but I find that these can be pretty solid if you find one used in good condition. Just be sure to check the frest and nut as those'll be your biggest issue.

Everyone knows what a Les Paul is. The Les Paul guitar has been an icon in the guitar world for nearly 60 years now. The shape is a classic shape and the design is timeless. There have been countless version of the Les Paul released. Many are short lived but there are a few variations that Gibson has decided to make regular. The Les Paul Studio has been a common model for the last 20 or so years. The Les Paul Studio is a no frills version of the Les Paul. The guitar is pretty much a Les Paul Standard without any extras. There is no binding anywhere to be found. Most models come with a rosewood fretboard but some have ebony which I do not understand. They have 22 frets with trapezoid inlays now. They use to come with dot inlays. The neck is the baseball bat 50s style. It comes with standard gibson 490R and 498T pickups. It has the standard Les Paul control layout with a volume and tone for teach pickup and a 3 way switch.

UTILIZATION

No frills reaches into the area of playability also. With the 50s style neck some players might have some problems. They have put the 50s profile Gibson neck on this guitar so the neck is huge. People call the 50s profile neck the baseball bat neck. This may make it hard for some people with smaller hands to play. Because of the set neck design there is a large neck tenon and joint. This can make the upper frets hard for some people to reach because the body essentially joins the neck at the 17th fret. After the 17th fret you are reaching around the body to get to the frets. Because there is no binding the guitar will be more likely to have sharp fret edges when you first get it. This guitar is a lot lighter than most Les Pauls due to it being chambered. This means they cut wood out from the inside of the guitar so it is almost like a semi-hollow. If you x-rayed the guitar it would look like it was made out of swiss cheese with little circles cut out of it. Gibson still isnt putting locking bridges on their guitars. When you change strings the bridge can come off because it is held on by string tension. If this happens make sure you put it on the right way because you can put it on backwards and your intonation will be horribly off. When this happens your guitar will sound in tune on the open strings but any chords you play will sound off. Companies like ESP have been putting locking tune-o-matic bridges on their guitars for years.

SOUNDS

Being a low end Gibson it has the generic Gibson pickups. These pickups are not anything special. With the chambering the natural tone of the guitar is really effected. You can compare a chambered Les Paul to a non chambered Les Paul and you can really hear the difference. A non chambered Les Paul will sound more solid. The mahogany wood give the guitar a really deep sound even though the body is not that big. If you want to play heavier music you may want to change out the pickups. The Gibson pickups are medium output and are voiced more for classic rock. Putting in some Classic 57s would be okay if you want to keep it all Gibson but I recommend some Seymour Duncan pickups for a guitar like this.

OVERALL OPINION

This guitar sells for about 800 dollars. At that low a price there are better guitars out there if you are not just buying it for the Gibson logo on the headstock. A high end Epiphone which would be about 100 dollars less is just as good if not better than this guitar. The money you save getting the high end Epiphone you can put towards some nice pickups and you would have a much better guitar then. You can find some Edwards guitars for this cheap and they would also be much better since they are non chambered and come with aftermarket pickups and ebony fretboards stock. If you are looking for a cheap Les Paul and it has to be a Gibson they dont get much cheaper than this.

The Gibson Les Paul Studio is generally the guitar that people first buy when they get into Gibsons. The guitar features a mahogany body with a mahogany neck and rosewood fretboard, 22 frets, tune-o-matic bridge, two humbuckers, two volumes, two tones, a pickguard, trapezoid inlays and a three way switch.

UTILIZATION

I generally find these have the most iffy fretwork out of the entire Gibson lineup. They're generally crowned decently, but how level they are and how much the edges stick out really depends on how the luthiers were feeling at the time of day the guitar was made. The guitars also can exhibit some nut binding issues, too. If your guitar has any of these issues, you'll want to go ahead and have a lutheir do a fret level and redo the nut. That should make the guitar play like butter. Aside from that, the guitar is pretty much a standard Gibson Les Paul minus the maple top.

SOUNDS

The guitars generally sound darker and thicker than a normal Les Paul. They're also somewhat lighter due to the lack of a maple top. The bridge pickup is decent, but I find they're very medium output. This can prevent you from really dialing in a good metal tone if you're into that. The neck pickups are kinda bright for me. I'm a fan of really dark and smooth neck pickup tones, and I don't really like Gibson pickups for that kind of tone. If you're going to replace them, I recommend something like the JB/59 combo. That should really make the guitar scream and come alive.

OVERALL OPINION

If you're looking for a cheaper Gibson, get an Edwards, Burny, Tokai or something like that. You'll be much better off than buying one of these. The quality is iffy on these, they don't sound like a normal Les Paul and they lack some of the ascetics that a normal one would have.

Gibson Les Paul Studio 1993.

See product

UTILIZATION

I use it since 2000. It's a very nice guitar to play even though initially I put a little time to get used to (coming from a metal handle typed).

Access to treble is good but not obvious in this case should not buy a Les Paul.

Is connected and it sounds ...
Tested and approved in a Line 6 Pod 2.0, SansAmp GT2, Marshall JCM 2000, Marchal Valvlestate 100 W, 15 W Kustom ...

SOUNDS

Mine is an "old" but it sounds really good. With distortion is royal. The pickups (490R & 498T) its very polyvalent.s

On the bridge pickup, it is assumed crunch costo very bluesy rock to heavy metal limits. By tuning down is the orgy. In his clear, the sound was typical les paul (amateur sound buy a fender crystalline ...) But it sounds.

On the neck pickup, sounds very 70's sounding rhythmic type (Sabbath, ...) but I think it proves that lead to wonderful. It's bold, hot ... Gary Moore had better watch out. In his clear, very round but again quite bold.

These microphones are great when you play with the gain level of knobs.

The combination of both on the other hand is not necessarily the one I use most ...

In general, it is fat, warm but with good equal, it can become sharp boundary ...

OVERALL OPINION

A very good guitar on which I played for 10 years ... I love the violin very simple (black, silver hardware) which is also one of the reasons for the price ... (It's worth it to not like the bling-bling

The only one of my guitars on which I have not changed. To advise emergency. I heard some on this forum compare gibson epiphone studio has ... I think we do not speak the same guitars. After testing standards recent ... my old studio need not be ashamed ...
+ Quality of the handle
+ Versatility in its saturated (from blues to metal)
+ The sound
+ Sobriety of violin (but personal taste and therefore subjective)
+ Good ratio Q / P

- The weight because you have to find something wrong but ... paul)

Made in USA.
Mahogany body with rooms.
Maple table.

Mahogany, Rounded profile.

Ebony.
Acrylic trapezoid markers.
Not binding.
22 frets.

Tune O Matic bridge with tailpiece stopbar.
Mechanical Green Key.

Pickups: 2 humbuckers - 498 T - 490 R
2 Volumes, 2 Tones, 3-position selector.
Gibson Case.

Finishes quite correct, but not perfect either, forced to see. White finish, of course, it does not leave room for error, the smallest defect is visible. On mine, I notice a small flaw in the application of varnish on the back of the neck, and the junction between the nail of neck and fingerboard, which is perfect.

Nothing really bad, it's details. No impact on gameplay.
I buy mine online. I had no choice, waiting time in the store was really too long.

I wish other mics ...

UTILIZATION

The shape Les Paul is the perfect shape for an electric guitar I think.

Rounded handle Gibson is the profile that I prefer (I have big hands).

The body with the chambers, AC reduces the guitar actually not bad (compared to a Les Paul Edwards, solid body). This is far from unpleasant.

Access to acute is that of a les paul, ie pretty bad in the 16th Box ...

The settings are very comprehensive and effective ...

The varnish is a bit "sticky", it must do ... and is highly fragile, should keep the guitar in his box (I had the audacity to put it on a stand, the varnish has yellowed a little, very quickly. Fortunately, I saw it once and it was washed away now .. phew). Finally, I wanted a Les Paul with an ebony fingerboard, then here ...

But next, it'll be a Gibson Custon Ebony tubeless (the 68 or 57) ...

SOUNDS

... Because the rooms, I think it means ...

I do not really know if it comes from 498T or rooms, but the Les Paul has a sound reminiscent of a Hollowbody (type ES335, for example) ...

But I do not know if it comes from or room mics ...

Anyway, the guitar is perfect for rock, blues, country, jazz ... for clean tones, crunch (what bliss) for the distortion a little fat old school ... on the other hand for modern metal sounds, she is doing, but no more.

The micro 490R is fine, but I already knew (on a SG).

The 498T microphone, it is quite powerful and quite rough. The term "the fat" takes any definition ca. You understand that the modern metal, AC can be a problem. Got to see the amp settings.

See my config 'on my profile picture.

Edit: I replaced the pickups with Gibson a couple of Seymour Duncan SH1 '59 ... Finish this "draft" ... The '59 is less loaded medium, have a lower output level, but are much more versatile ... The modern metal, no problem ... It's the sound that should have a Les Paul in my opinion. Vintage, but well defined and balanced ... Perfect ...

(I already have two guitars with a couple SH1 and SH4, so I took two SH1 '59 for it, I'm not disappointed).

OVERALL OPINION

I have for 5 months.

I had a lot of guitar, see the advice that I could do on the guitar that I had or have in my possession.

I like the ebony fingerboard, the form of Les Paul, the weight content, the neck, the playability (free of defects), the sound in general ...

I like the sounds in the least saturated fat with the 498T (too rough with my equipment). Small defects in finish, this can make out some of their hinges (I do not care).

The varnish is very fragile and white, does not forgive any mistakes.

I would do if that choice. In this budget, yes ... If I can get the triple, no, I take a custom with a full body.

The price / quality ratio is very correct. Approximately € 900

edit: I did not like the pickups ... I found my happiness with Seymour Duncan SH1 '59 ...