All user reviews for the Behringer Virtualizer Pro DSP2024P

Rack format effects 19 "1U.
71 Algoritmes of effects, basics, unavoidable and unusable ... All within.
Internal memories with 100 presets and 100 users.
4 pots on the front to edit and modify the effects in real time.
1 mix knob and buttons to access the menus.
Rear: MIDI plug in out tru, inputs and outputs stereo jack or XLR 6'35.
Encran 7-segment LED.

UTILIZATION

Ultra easy to use.
Comprehensive manual in English, with explanation of the effects editions ... As against very light in French. It is not too useful given the simplicity of the device.

SOUND QUALITY

The everything and nothing !!!!
Of the 71 effects algorithms proposed:
The Reverb: the softer going well (Room, ambience). Other (internship, cathedral ...) are too drafts.

The delay: classic

Modulations: Chorus not bad. Flanger, phaser: beautiful but with enough light settings.

Dynamic and psycho-acoustic: I like the compressor and the ultra low but again with a fairly light setting because it saturates quickly and gives an audible boiled in extreme low frequencies!

Filter and EQ: EQ do their jobs well enough, the LFO is awful!

Distortion and amp simulation I do not therefore uses little or no notice. For the distortion, it is better to go through a Boss pedal (metal zone for example).

Special FX: contains vinylizer useless
Sampler: shit
Vocoder whistles and badly works, it is rather a generator Feedback !!!
Resonator: nothing sèrieux.

and finally combinations of the most used effects: Chorus & Reverb, Flanger and Delay ....

OVERALL OPINION

I bought here is over 10 years for 119 €.
I keep it because I use it for some reverb and phaser on synthetic string sounds (slight swirling effect) in small doses.
I do not think regret my choice because I have 4 personal presets that serve me well.
Otherwise I have other more serious effects processors (Alesis) to work my sounds.
Today, I do not think I will ever want.
In occase, it is so cheap and little help novice musicians!
I have nothing against Berhinger, but they would have let that classical effects and avoid making the filling with completions useless things: sampler and vocoder, for example.

A caintaine FX available and modifiable via encoders or MIDI.
Rackable, jack, XLR, MIDI IN OUT THRU.

UTILIZATION

With a tiny screen and several pages of parameters is a fight for quickly editing effects. The manual is comprehensive.

SOUND QUALITY

Yes the effects are good although they sometimes lack a little body.
I breath in the machine that I have a problem for my enregirements.
I use it on an auxiliary table Mackie 1402 VLZ Pro.

OVERALL OPINION

For a first rack FX why not. We can familiar with managing the effects but for further better to go into a higher range use.

This processor is correct effects, are 99 programs: reverb, delay, tremolo, distortion, and create opportunities for yourself. on the other hand, you can not edit the effects on a computer.
This is a processor all in one, digital, quality effects is not bad, but do not expect it to be the rolls of processors for that price. Practice for someone who has no other and for a DJ or a sound engineer who wants to send some effect on his backing tracks.
6

UTILIZATION

6

SOUND QUALITY

6

OVERALL OPINION

I bought it used and used very little, because I have other effects at my disposal modules.
Sold then, as I had bought.
Not bad at all for someone looking for an effects processor for cheap.
General and personal rating: 6/10

on my experience, I would say that if you do not try you can not know if it's a good deal or not, but for the price it's worth a try.

reverb, chorus, flanger, compressor / limiter, phaser, delay, expander, pan, tremolo, pitch, leslie, etc ...

triplet noon, in, out, thru, 19 "

in / out jack / XLR

UTILIZATION

child use editing even very simple device.

100 factory presets and 100 user

SOUND QUALITY

not too bad if reverb reverb tail too long, otherwise one side a metal thing.

I use it mainly comp / limiter in addition to a tc electronic rack and a future to come.

Other effects are almost usable, taking the time and care to polish.

OVERALL OPINION

a dozen years, for the price it was not bad, but now we have the possibility of finding well above, for little more expensive ... in new and even more secondhand ....

But it is true that given in the context of time, he offered still a lot of possibilities and various effects.

More details and manufacturer Other AF for details. Modulation effects (chorus, flanger, etc ...) standards, dynamic effects (enhancer, compressor, etc ...), reverb, delay and also full of useless stuff that ridiculous "vynilizer" or questionable vocoder.
Editable in stereo or 2x mono with user submissions.
Any digital low cost.

UTILIZATION

Not very complicated, 4 knobs endless assigned according to the selected function. An interesting detail: the button "compare" which allows, as its name suggests to compare the sound with and without the effect. The manual, as always with Behringer is bloated but may be instructive to start (prefer the English version, Holes in French).

SOUND QUALITY

Frankly, any patch integrated into a table (even UFX Behringer supposedly copied it virtualizer there) or a recording done as well if not better. In addition (but this is a personal and subjective opinion), the sound goes "very small".
I used it on guitar, keyboard or auxiliary on a table.
The most convincing effect reverb: a fouletitude parameters and rendering pretty cool.

OVERALL OPINION

I have 7 years but I really use it very rarely. As said above, I love all the patches arranged on the table or the recorder, it's less cables to connect, or the guitar, real pedals.
Obviously, for the price, do not dream. Still, this is solid, full of pretty small lights and you can have fun with (but only fun ...). That's why I did not note 3.
I do not have that choice. If I had to be really useful to a rack of effects, I'd Tap highest in the range.

What are the effects or types of effects available?
Behringer View website for more info, but it's still a base effects hundreds, I think because I no longer use it for a few months!

Are they edited?
Yes, totally

Via a Mac / PC editor?
no I do not think my side I edited the effects only through the DSP2024P.

Is this a rack or rack MODEL?
Yes, it's a Rack 19 "standard.

What technology is used? (Analog, digital, tube ...)
It's 100% Digital. 24bits

What is the connection? (Audio / MIDI)
Full Midi, Jack and XLR

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is it simple?
Yes very simple, child's play, there is no need to be an expert!

The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Yes, well!

Editing sounds and effects is it easy?
Yes relatively easy and in real time, I've seen worse!

SOUND QUALITY

The effects are they effective, responsive and realistic enough?
I did not use "all" effects, but they range from blah to very correct!

Which instruments do you use?
Used on a S3000XL AKAI because I do not ais card effects.

Which ones do you prefer, you hate?
I no longer remember!

OVERALL OPINION

How long have you use it?
I used almost 1 year.

Have you tried many other models before buying it?
No, because this one was in my ways to use what I had to do!


What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The +: The ease of use!
the -: it breath a bit 'but it's still the entry level, do not seek perfection for its secondhand price ... even nine!

How would you rate the quality / price?
Very good value / price

With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Yes without hesitation.

For a list of effects and settings, see the doc downloadable behringer website

the effects are editable, customizable a wish, then I do not use my MIDI jacks.

Behringer rack is fairly lightweight I must say, and this one seems very solid, it's been 2 years since I have, however occas buy for 40 euros, this one works like the first day (as I developed comparison that of a colleague).
For connectivity, the basic inputs and outputs XLR jack, MIDI connectors 3.

UTILIZATION

Configuration is very simple, reading a little bit manual is clear.
Editing: then it's a hassle to edit the manual seems to me almost mandatory (having succeeded with this one) I have to spend a lot a lot of time for a result that would suit me.

SOUND QUALITY

then, mixed, some are, some not at all.
Behringer wanted to do here rather a gadget when some sounds mean, I use it only for the reverb on light boxes. and forget the pre-programmed effects, sculpt yours

OVERALL OPINION

As said above, I use it for 2 years, I have several, some unknown to the battalion, but I can quote lexicon mx200, the line 6 echo pro (very good rack for that matter)

+ + His massive hand, its strength, which can be drawn looking good, its price!
- Complicated to program, sounds really gross gross plant.
value for money is unbeatable and obviously I'm pretty glad even if after a long time to grind the buttons I wanted to throw it out the window!
Yes I would do this choice without hesitate.

see reviews for upstream effects types, all changed for a long as you have the picture of the user under the eyes

technology: the MADE IN CHINA recess,
while RCA jack and MIDI

a small screen used for everything

UTILIZATION

the preset are drinking, if you have the table on the eyes
in quickly realizes that some presets are useless, as the control effect is set low

there's also oddities: the preset distortion sound like a compressor, delay of which are reverb

SOUND QUALITY

The good news: it is the memory location to copy and paste re ITS own way to parameterize effects.
BYPASS and the COMPARE function is a great idea, but there's a latency of 0.7 sec audible damage to the LIVE
I use the instructions in the studio right next because it is the tedious stuff, but it allows me to do the final mastering with its top quality,

OVERALL OPINION

and for testing the Digitech and Alesis before I feel I have a good deal, excellent value for money

ah yes, it's very ugly like that, but the location of the knobs is very intelligent, so we are glad to global

it is available in nine for months and months, there's the alternative

say that this model is the agglomeration of four models of the brand that are no longer at all, a rack that includes the potential four older models.

Behringer is well known insiders ... In short, having had this device, the general default is to not be able to have more of a 10aine switchable effects on different instruments (reverb on mics, flange on guitar) Apart from this, If you want to store effects characters, you must delete the program "factories" which is pretty boring
Let's say for the price you have a Behringer.
Rack-mount Model
Digital Effects
Digital technology
No MIDI cennectique

UTILIZATION

Configuration easy but takes time to know the possibilities of the machine
The edition this facade by four sliders

SOUND QUALITY

Some effects like reverb and distortion friendly, for chorus against the flanges and 5 / 10
Utils with guitar Elec. Acoustic, bass and sax.

OVERALL OPINION

I will not repeat the same choice given the new models come out.

The dsp2024 not be confused with the dsp1000 one finds all the effect of the Virtualization and MODULIZER all in 24 bit dual engine of course (very practical)

UTILIZATION

The config is very simple compare function is very practical, the mix button / bypass very effective, the only regret is for non-English speaking because in french we have a small manual!
but no discomfort very simple c

SOUND QUALITY

Personal (I use a JMP1 and a power amp and in my modest home studio) I am very happy with the quality of the reverbs very garnds choice and diversity of color, pitch shift tremolo effect is very successful, the chorus are ideal very transparent (great for guitar) amp simulator succeeded with a lot of SET, shame we can not combine it with a reverb

OVERALL OPINION

I've had a week and I am very happy vraiemment the quality of reverbs and modulation effects are very good, a successful purchase for me and only 180 euros!

Then the behringer really shown a great professionalism!
This effect is really impressive given its price. I found it was € 90 in auccasion (Power in Music in Paris).
J'ésitais between the TC-Electronics M-One and the € 320 to € 90 Virtualizer Pro.
And live for use connected to my sampler, and even in my home studio, I just tell you that the choice was quickly resolved!
The reverbs are very successful. The chorus is flanger are good that the ANSI dynamic effects, the exit notement that works wonders!
Aporte a small correction on one of the earlier opinion, it is not necessary to clear the factory preset bank as there are two I for Internal and U for user.
This effect is truly a marvel.
Éllucider remains a question, why sellers always tell you bad things about behringer (description of my sale is a small effect). Me personally I think it is any other multi-effects!
Quite a good deal !!!!!!!!

UTILIZATION

Simple and intuitive, just a little confusing at first but got used to it

SOUND QUALITY

Very very good in his enssemble

OVERALL OPINION

This is the top for small budget and perhaps even some other !!!!? lol

Digital multi-effect processor 24-bit dual-engine - reverb algorithms of virtual spaces to Wave Adaptive technology (the same as the MODULIZER Pro - 71 high performance algorithms for chorus effects, flanger, delay ... - Modeling of amps - 7 parameters modifiable effect - 11 effect combinations in series or parallel - More than 700 variations of effects - AD / DA converters 20 bit 64/128 times oversampling - 24 bit internal processor - Inputs and outputs electronically balanced on XLR and Jack - 100 preset + 100 user memories - LED display Level 8 segments - full MIDI implementation - Windows editing software downloadable from the Internet (not tried but it should not be very useful). Here
Still good value, lots of possibilities
(I find it very ugly .. .. it's good j'arete)

UTILIZATION

The display LED 4 is really not practical (Chianti) and editing is not simple (4 + 1 Mix knob / bybass) I've seen better ... So laborious edition but hey ca returned quickly.
Much less: limited use in the sense that one can not combine the effects .. (Except some preset ex factory: Reverb + Chorus)

- The manual is clear and sufficient? Not found

SOUND QUALITY

It's pretty clear but I find the reverb chouilla a "metal." Otherwise the rest is good value for money is no problem.
Psychoacoustic tricks stuff like Stereo-thing, esser, filters, or other compressor expander card -> BOF useless.
Okay so here (and 7 / 10 that's why) I would like to thank our wonderful Behringer for their pointless kind Vinyliser (The pitch too - berrrk) that mimics the cracking of vinyl every 1 seconds. This is completely zero but ca me laugh well done

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 5 months it took place in my home studio and it helps out well. I do not fit into the debate on the quality of products Berhinger because frankly when we not afford a TC Electronic This machine is there and did a great job.
I criticized a lot but I knew I expected qd I bought a product of its kind to € 150. He does what is asked of him and he does it well, obviously I book for home-studiotisites beginners like me. A good buy that I do it again if I had not spent in Cubase

-

UTILIZATION

-

SOUND QUALITY

-

OVERALL OPINION

I had a 03D and when I pass the 02R, the internal distos n'taient then for miles over the ball, I give it a go and I'm not carrment, although On the contrary ... Now I have the 02R96 and y 'are the distos amme 4 internally, but I do not regret my purchase at all on the bass or the voice, I love the Behringer, there's grain It's easy to use, and in addition, there are plenty of other nice effects rev ...

This effects processor possde two banks of 99 effects (bank + bank factory customizable). All the classics are available, from rverb, delay, ... to the distortions, table tennis, and fun stuff like the effect vinyl, pitch ... example (Please Lock the friend for making me discovering the pitch Behringer! . These effects numriques.
You can program his own bank remodlisant effects (all custom settings can be changed and logarithmic) and keep them as remodliss's got.

UTILIZATION

The use is bone simple! That same child's play than trying p'tit its effect, is to customize and save it in his personal bank!
The manual is almost superfluous, although clear trs.

SOUND QUALITY

I used this, ds The beginning, for my voice. For the price, it is very well BUT: I did say "value"! And yes, do not quibble too! First, to a man's voice (I saw with my lves), it is perfect, warm, round ... It amliore things well. For me, I suffer a little, even when. As long as you sing softly and in a register mdium is trs well, but the ds is pushed slightly toward the treble (in registers or the Barbra STREISAND Lara Fabian) He admits its limits! Highs are no longer covered and dtimbre a bit. Warning! It is not a question of micro, no table, no compression, no amp, no ... vote! I also LEXICON one, and there's no photo, it provides!
With a guitar, you have to limit the rverb ... ct FUZZ, RING, and other distortions, it is really troubleshooting, emergency, for a live, but ... plutt keep your good old pedals!
To rope or a harmonica for example, it is nice ... basic but effective.

OVERALL OPINION

I have this bug since about 2 years and I use it every day in the studio or live, for my personal voice work, my singing lessons my lves, ...
J'apprcie its maneuverability its simplicity express his troubleshooting in times of crises, like "must connect all scne 8:15 p.m. 8:30 p.m. for the concert! No time to do the balance! ". L is perfect!
His only default, for APRS me is limited by the acute power and a little breath-taking sound to a recording.
C'tait my first real multi-purpose APRS expriences some bad effects DJ. I have since invested in LEXICON (Wow!).
The report qualitprix is ​​excellent and I would do the purchase without a doubt, because for me it's the off-road situations full of indispensable!
A possder!