Become a member
Become a member

or
Continue with Google
Log in
Log in

or
Log in using a Google account
Add this product to
  • Mon ancien matos
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Lexicon MPX-1
Images
1/415

All user reviews for the Lexicon MPX-1

Multi-Effects Processor from Lexicon belonging to the MPX series.

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Keywords
Average Score:
( 4.4/5 based on 5 reviews )
2 reviews
40 %
2 reviews
40 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • Anonymous

    Lexicon MPX-1Published on 10/26/07 at 01:49
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I use the MPX1 for my acoustic guitar for its beautiful rverbs. I actually need help the programer because I'm a little Largu and I dteste Docs. Eg how-morphing between FX, how MIDI program pgm change, if I press the # 12 on my crankset twelve o'clock how to call the 203 eg in MPX1? I know it sucks, but I prefer to play guitar!
    If anyone can respond to me that would be great.
    Milesker (as they say in the Basque Country)

    USE

    Not

    SOUND QUALITY

    Yes, guitar ac.

    NOTICE GLOBAL

    15 days. Until now i was Rocktron for my guitars (el. Or ac.)
  • stephbobstephbob

    Better than plugins

    Lexicon MPX-1Published on 10/07/13 at 12:44
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Reverb effect mainly digital machines, but the good of the era with a clean Lexicon algorithms.

    UTILIZATION

    This is the logic of the Lexicon, must be manual at first.

    SOUND QUALITY

    I found for myself that the effects are relatively well, the reverbs are warmer than the plugins that I have used before.

    I use it on all my projects on the snares and the voice in the overall mix to give depth.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use about 6 months ago, I tried other models.
    What I like most is that we found although this is not either the CFM models from Lexicon, the Lexicon reverb and quite honorable.
    Used the price / quality ratio is really good, and yes with the same bu…
    Read more
    Reverb effect mainly digital machines, but the good of the era with a clean Lexicon algorithms.

    UTILIZATION

    This is the logic of the Lexicon, must be manual at first.

    SOUND QUALITY

    I found for myself that the effects are relatively well, the reverbs are warmer than the plugins that I have used before.

    I use it on all my projects on the snares and the voice in the overall mix to give depth.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use about 6 months ago, I tried other models.
    What I like most is that we found although this is not either the CFM models from Lexicon, the Lexicon reverb and quite honorable.
    Used the price / quality ratio is really good, and yes with the same budget I would do this choice.
    See less
  • voicetrackvoicetrack

    Lexicon MPX-1Published on 10/12/04 at 05:14
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Chain of six simultaneous effects that may have as we want to route, stereo, channel by channel, Stereo mix effect from the two inputs to mono for the use of two departures from auxiliary console for example, and a little extra that is the insertion of an effects (pitch, distortion, equa, tremolo, wah ... etc) in the feedback delay, dub, and vintage effect guaranteed!

    the machine is very complete and goes far enough in certain settings to the choice of grain Vox or Crybaby Wah for her (you can assign the cut-off of the wah filter or resonant, the infield dal, envlop generator, an LFO, or MIDI controller with notes etc ... is unfortunately, a remainder of the emulation)

    can control the…
    Read more
    Chain of six simultaneous effects that may have as we want to route, stereo, channel by channel, Stereo mix effect from the two inputs to mono for the use of two departures from auxiliary console for example, and a little extra that is the insertion of an effects (pitch, distortion, equa, tremolo, wah ... etc) in the feedback delay, dub, and vintage effect guaranteed!

    the machine is very complete and goes far enough in certain settings to the choice of grain Vox or Crybaby Wah for her (you can assign the cut-off of the wah filter or resonant, the infield dal, envlop generator, an LFO, or MIDI controller with notes etc ... is unfortunately, a remainder of the emulation)

    can control the settings via midi and there is even an arpeggiator (which can assign a sound generator and a distortion and resonant filter, for example, enough to make a synth solo tres original!)

    The list of possibilities is too long ...

    UTILIZATION

    It has something for nothing and contrairemen TCelectronic machines, it is difficult to cope without the user manual but a faith we understand, it's not making too much a head twisted at times may . The tap tempo is set and can even take the average of blows taps.

    SOUND QUALITY

    The Lexicon reverbs sound good, more "demonstrative" but often heavier and less natural than a cel TCelectronic M-2000 for example, setting parameters are indeed quite different and the two complement each other really well nothing that at the level of reverb.

    For other effects, the MPX-1 is rather forbids well especially at the possibilities of delay. The latance the Flanger difficilemen makes use of a fader to post that gives the impression of having a second flanger fix in addition to its flange.

    The machine has a sound quite dynamic and well presented. This is a multi effect that alie character and quality which is remarkable for a camera in this class.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I lay for a week and I do not regret, I have already used on stage, and no bad surprises, everything went well. View the current rating, it's a great value for money.
    See less
  • blackleblackle

    A huge reservoir of creativity but a design could be improved.

    Lexicon MPX-1Published on 07/17/11 at 04:45
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Brand renowned multi-effects can be chained to individual desires and needs a large number of effects (maximum five) from the six simultaneously up the MPX 1. Transposition tone, chorus, EQ, modulation, delay and reverb, finally. Lexicon in its wisdom provides an interactive front (they call it that). It is true that all the buttons that light up to indicate all available functions is a useful thing, unfortunately in practice this device it becomes a trap when it is handled. The implementation noon (vital for me) is very comprehensive and allows all the internal sources of control are re-issued as a message of control system continues. A built-in arpeggiator driver of sound generators noon …
    Read more
    Brand renowned multi-effects can be chained to individual desires and needs a large number of effects (maximum five) from the six simultaneously up the MPX 1. Transposition tone, chorus, EQ, modulation, delay and reverb, finally. Lexicon in its wisdom provides an interactive front (they call it that). It is true that all the buttons that light up to indicate all available functions is a useful thing, unfortunately in practice this device it becomes a trap when it is handled. The implementation noon (vital for me) is very comprehensive and allows all the internal sources of control are re-issued as a message of control system continues. A built-in arpeggiator driver of sound generators noon and generates sound effects synchronized on this point it is a wonder!

    UTILIZATION

    A (very) long period of adaptation and understanding is needed to make the best use of its possibilities. The first days I used it and despite the manual which was on my lap I found myself as a real idiot in front of the screen, eyes wide and tongue hanging out and my brain boil (a big thank you to the Efferalgan passage). I could not see where I was made so the combinations of actions are huge and decked unfortunately ergonomics at least partially confusing and logic. Now and after having swallowed the whole flaquons "Cogitum" (plus I'm blonde) I feel better, but what a headache and I felt nunuche early! In fact I would say two words to those who have laid this woe interface that looks more like a torture for execice neurons as a real interface for normal users, ie humans. That day they had to have a grudge against the musicians is not possible otherwise!
    In short, once the drugs have Cogitum acts on the metabolism of my brain, I became a real caver editing because in fact this unit we discover always a lot of editable parameters, whether temporal or frequency, and within and outside options more or less easy to associate with the already large library of parameters related to an effect in particular.

    SOUND QUALITY

    Side the sound quality is really good job against the MPX 1 in spite of all my efforts I never managed to get reflections approaching a little bit of another model that I like many, LXP 15. The reverberations are much drier, less oily, I do not know how to say. The fact is that multi-mode program there is a good camera, the effects of transpositions in height and corrections are really good, and delays are all great.

    OVERALL OPINION

    A multi-effect that is great! But why Lexicon's use flanged ergonomics so perfectible? I bought some on a whim, thinking back, and better, all the qualities that made all the fame of the LXP series with musicians. So much for the quality of its effects I'm not disappointed, as I remain in use on my hunger. This is clearly not a device designed for live, but I like it anyway, it is a huge reservoir of creativity because I found it no limit combination and programming. Finally I read in previous opinions that it was more or less compared to the M Tc electronic 2000 home, with this model also has its use is certainly simpler, but artistically the Lexicon is much more interesting, cons for s 'accountable do not give up and go through with its logic.


    Sarah, a musician who has not hurt his head and not so silly it after all. Thank you to "Cogitum")
    See less
  • ric49ric49

    Lexicon MPX-1Published on 09/20/09 at 15:11
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Multi-state effects are. Reverb, chorus, delay's, etc. ..
    For all the rest has already been said ..

    UTILIZATION

    The general configuration is simple?
    A bit confusing at the start .. But once we realized it was good

    Editing sounds and effects is easy?
    ... Same as for general configuration.

    The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
    The manual is well done asser, but Lexicon is better.

    SOUND QUALITY

    By using multi-effects, we come to "out" some very interesting and frankly sometimes quite surprising!
    the pitches are of good bills, the modulations are very good, nice delays, reverbs on the other hand do not sound very lexicon .. We do not even far enough to sa…
    Read more
    Multi-state effects are. Reverb, chorus, delay's, etc. ..
    For all the rest has already been said ..

    UTILIZATION

    The general configuration is simple?
    A bit confusing at the start .. But once we realized it was good

    Editing sounds and effects is easy?
    ... Same as for general configuration.

    The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
    The manual is well done asser, but Lexicon is better.

    SOUND QUALITY

    By using multi-effects, we come to "out" some very interesting and frankly sometimes quite surprising!
    the pitches are of good bills, the modulations are very good, nice delays, reverbs on the other hand do not sound very lexicon .. We do not even far enough to say .. How .. Just above the TC Electronic M2000. Cons by mixing the reverb with other effects, I think (personal opinion any) that it is much better than the M2000 tc.
    Anyway the goal is precisely LEXICON by using multi-effects, and to use only the MPX 1 reverb and many are operating under the machine to the other .. LEXICON reverbs products ..

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use the MPX 1 in the studio for quite some years now (it came out in doing), I also have a home EVENTIDE DSP 4000, I have a clear preference for it, but I own both MPX love this one, which constantly monitors what I want for nothing, and then to his side "tying". To summarize:
    -The reverbs are not alone is strong, just for reverbs and stay in the same price range I would much prefer the LXP 15 II yet older.
    By-cons in using multi-effect is perfect.
    In conclusion I would do is choosing without hesitation.
    See less
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.