View other reviews for this product:
fjag1309
Published on 11/09/05 at 05:54
I chose this card (my Premire) here based on reviews from this site. I was looking for a quality rendering tool all in one (pramplis Intgr from the Delta 44 for example). And porting over my needs and knowledge of the moment (not much since I d stumbled). Ide had to work my own songs and covers with parties playing the guitar and singing and the rest in virtual instruments.
On a PC with home made Pentium 4 2.4 Gh, Asus P4P800 motherboard and HDDs for 120G and 20G to give Systm, I mainly use Cubase SX1 with all sorts of plug ins.
UTILIZATION
I have never encountered any problem during the installation or, nor in the use of this card. The configuration of the card is simple enough even for beginners, the manual is comprehensive and accessible.
GETTING STARTED
Everything was smooth and I have never changed the original drivers (ASIO). Ditto for anything that relates latency. I look for curiosities but the default config was perfect.
I record 4 tracks simultaneously without worry, the maximum for that interface. The ability to leave chanage imagine that could go further as all this is trivial Fawn.
OVERALL OPINION
I have this card for 3 years.
By dint of reading articles evokes a particular malfunction or incompatibility can not be happy qu'tre card without notable problem.
If we add that a good quality audio trs (I say no point of comparison but based on what I hear) and the possibility of using enough shoots (insert the IN the fawn in a mixer for example.), we can Whereas the deck was good the first time (thank you all who have guided me in this choice).
The report quality price? Pay 300 new in rusant a little is great!
For the same type of need, I definitely would do this choice. Today, I returned to service within a group and is considering recording drum tracks for which 4 are somewhat limited. It also lacks some connection types for a total volutivit. And mobile solutions are also attractive ...
But for a fixed station budget and needs in terms of Modra, the card rack and are sure about.
On a PC with home made Pentium 4 2.4 Gh, Asus P4P800 motherboard and HDDs for 120G and 20G to give Systm, I mainly use Cubase SX1 with all sorts of plug ins.
UTILIZATION
I have never encountered any problem during the installation or, nor in the use of this card. The configuration of the card is simple enough even for beginners, the manual is comprehensive and accessible.
GETTING STARTED
Everything was smooth and I have never changed the original drivers (ASIO). Ditto for anything that relates latency. I look for curiosities but the default config was perfect.
I record 4 tracks simultaneously without worry, the maximum for that interface. The ability to leave chanage imagine that could go further as all this is trivial Fawn.
OVERALL OPINION
I have this card for 3 years.
By dint of reading articles evokes a particular malfunction or incompatibility can not be happy qu'tre card without notable problem.
If we add that a good quality audio trs (I say no point of comparison but based on what I hear) and the possibility of using enough shoots (insert the IN the fawn in a mixer for example.), we can Whereas the deck was good the first time (thank you all who have guided me in this choice).
The report quality price? Pay 300 new in rusant a little is great!
For the same type of need, I definitely would do this choice. Today, I returned to service within a group and is considering recording drum tracks for which 4 are somewhat limited. It also lacks some connection types for a total volutivit. And mobile solutions are also attractive ...
But for a fixed station budget and needs in terms of Modra, the card rack and are sure about.