4.5/5(5 reviews)
40 %
40 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
Clem''sa small jewelry
Published on 10/29/14 at 18:42 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Recorder digital type more than satisfactory. For just 100 euro on an object on the hands. One senses immediately that this is a product that resists yours and unpredictable shock. I use it for 2 years and I have no problem. Battery consumption is almost zero. His most? different recording format. Its less? lack of internal phantom power. In its entirety, this product is very good: it easily ny, is not at all bulky, takes charge quickly and multiple function very useful. From a personal point of view I would rather recommend investing in a TASCAM in a ZOOM. Its almost instantaneous ignition is convenient to catch a flight to her.70
RevlouGood tool
Published on 10/04/14 at 09:41 (This content has been automatically translated from French)We did used to record voices and sounds, never music.
Very easy to use and good quality recording.04
alex FLSVery good
Published on 10/03/14 at 02:57 (This content has been automatically translated from French)How long have you use it?
-more than a year
Have you tried many other models before buying it?
c-not my first
What thing do you like most and least?
-the no choice record to wav or mp3 as diverse as:
wav 16bit / 24bit wav / mp3 32k / 64k mp3 / mp3 96k / 128k mp3 / mp3 192k / 256k mp3
and 320k mp3
mp3 320k = 2:54 p.m. Registration
16bit wav 3:22 = ""
entered mic / line or microphone for a rec live such a concert.
Headphone out
-the moin uh ???
How would you rate the quality / price?
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
-report quality / price correct
-if I change it to a range above but if it suits me very well at the momentRead moreHow long have you use it?
-more than a year
Have you tried many other models before buying it?
c-not my first
What thing do you like most and least?
-the no choice record to wav or mp3 as diverse as:
wav 16bit / 24bit wav / mp3 32k / 64k mp3 / mp3 96k / 128k mp3 / mp3 192k / 256k mp3
and 320k mp3
mp3 320k = 2:54 p.m. Registration
16bit wav 3:22 = ""
entered mic / line or microphone for a rec live such a concert.
Headphone out
-the moin uh ???
How would you rate the quality / price?
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
-report quality / price correct
-if I change it to a range above but if it suits me very well at the momentSee less51
d-trackExcelent
Published on 06/20/13 at 10:05 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 3 months, easy to use for novices, I said, with headphones, you can hear live what you recorded at the beginning, it's been weird when it's not used, you hear sound of a motorcycle that you do not see, and 10 seconds later, you see it, this little device is adjustable for sensitivity, it means that when you walk, you clearly hear your footsteps!
There is an option to avoid saturation of sound, ca manages itself!
Value / price: unbeatable!21
didou650more than an accessory, a companion
Published on 04/22/12 at 12:47 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for almost a year. Before I tried the Zoom H1 which broke down after one week. My buddy had bassist meanwhile the H2 that fell in the harbor after a month.
Given the value, it does. I use it to record répets and the acquisition of various sounds for inclusion in my compositions.
The autonomy of the two batteries is more than correct, the sound quality is good.
Visible and intuitive menu, tuner, that brief happiness.
I also use it for my mix of my songs in MP3 from my multitrack.
To summarize, this is the Tascam, not lizard.110