Electro-Voice RE510

Transistor condenser microphone
Super cardioid
Bandwidth: 40Hz-20000Hz
Accepts pressure (SPL): 150dB
Low Cut Switch (at the mic capsule, to accder, we must guard the dvisser)

The body of the microphone is coated with an anti Contents drapes, enjoyable enough to touch.

The construction of all inspires srieux.

I bought this microphone without being able to try on CHARACTERISTICS posters on the site of EV, the reputable brand microphones, and because of the opportunist j'avaais have less than 120 euros on ebay, shipping included, via the United States.

OVERALL OPINION

Until then, I possdais MB78Beta a T bone, and I really realized that this type of micro c'tait which suited me as a singer, and also better suited than dynamic lot of other vocalists (voice mlodieuses or sing) as a technician.
With the RE510, I wanted a microphone that goes even further.
I also had the opportunity to work with and Beta87a AKG535eb.
T Bone, the AKG and Shure are the only three I knew REFERENCE.

So I was looking for an EV mic with this in mind lplutot neutral Fidler, friendly tone of voice and trs clear and open ...

Well it's not really the case with the RE510.
This micro Indeed, while restoring the tessitura of the voice of Manir Fidler enough without the "transform" as could a dynamic (Manir of more or less subtle or as grossire mics . EV) provides a clear color to the sound.
In this he is not neutral because it is not his intention.

Rather it is loaded in the bottom mdium, but not as an SM58, it is less coarse and more musical in fact.
Mdium up, as it is trs soft, Celil is dmarque other mics, static or not, that clearly highlight the frquences, not aggressive at all.
The grave is as Submitted, and without the low-cut, they REALLY make the foundation and its heat, which can be on occasions INTERESTED instruments, less of a voice I think, although this dpend vote, and then in the studio, no worries.
Finally for me the highs are quite absent (or too obscured by low mdiums and serious too), this microphone for me lack of clarity and brightness in the sound as compared what I know, the T bone or Shure.Malgr this, they mix the treble fairly easily if you have to make.

In short, it is a micro trs typil need to know, but at the same time I think it's prettier and musical color SM58 and a SM57.
Personally, at my first attempts, I dcu t, because it really is not what I expected from such a micro ...
Then pass the dception and my preconceptions, I really started apprcier the quality of this EV.
The sound, though rather well typest Dfine prcis and across the spectrum (more than an SM58 or BETA58 for me). The fact that it is a static is not insignificant in the r RESULT I think.
Then it has a trs rjection good mic for the Feedback of this kind of cash and large pressures trs, so it can be used to add sound aisment a battery or resume guitare.Ce micro amp is more than not, moreover, that voice.
Otherwise, the plosives are in the average but a little too Submitted quandmme (although thus controlling the vocalist).

I sold because it did not fit what I recherchais.La person who bought me want to take over and use sound to his saxophone among other things, it will give me his impressions or share can be here with You.
But in absolute terms, this is a good microphone, it's true characters and personali who really dmarque of its competitors (Shure, AKG, I do not know the others as Neumann). Not that these mics have no personality but their characters are not as quenched as ElectroVoice my opinion.
I think it should though the recovery of certain instruments or voices to a rock, or on which mtal privilgie grain, characters transparency.
You can go with this mic, it cash without flinching, a great alternative to SM58 dynamic style and consors.

A try in any case it should or should not, it's not a micro forcment versatile (although this notion appear different depending on the tastes and sensibilities of each) but it may do so by the I think many circumstances.
It is neither better nor worse than some of its competitors, it is actually DIFFERENT trs.

I do not put the maximum because it did not suit me too, on the spot I had a good ide arrtmme if he could have a place in my fleet of micro and j ' Will really wanted to keep it (but I needed the money too ...)

I have since bought a Shure Beta87a (also on e-bay, nine less than 150 euros, also including postage) and ca is really more my needs and expectations.

48v phantom power, vocal static

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 days, I have tried the Audix OM 7 the neumann kms 105, sm 58 the same day with headphones in the store or I acheté.Je find richer and more clear that the SM 58, a little less natural than the neumann, the audix me parraissant low gain.la clip seems a little cheap and not super sûre.les pops are fairly sourtout this if you move away from micro.Quand it is 2 or 3 inches it will mieux.J 've also removed the grill to try the potion that cuts the bass (it is al interior) and I have noticed that the foam that covers the inner cavity of the grid is not stuck, so a bit tricky to close the grille.je've tested it on my home studio monitors and my aer (48v phantom power required), and I find the proper protection to feedback. I found the Q / very good price. I love the warmth and precision that he brings to my voice (which is rather low medium) and the clarity with respect to a sm 58 that I used for 20 years.
I'll post my impressions when I'd use it on stage in different situations.