All user reviews for the Numark AXIS-4

I bought 2 axis 4 about a month ago and I am satisfied with TRS.
particular feature I like: 3 cue points that are used a lot, easy handling (in any case, given the size of the record, it is better that the grip is easy or too hard !!!!), pitch or too soft, nice ergonomics (I was expecting something much smaller in size ... but it's nice in real trs!), luminescent screen ... practice, huge flying very practical, antishock allowing loops and perfect recall of cue without latency.
What I dislike: c'es pity there is no loading slot-in and that is still required to put the cd in the drawers ...
Before I had my numark CDN22 ....... see anything ...
The report qualitprix trs seems good (I pay 209 on the turntable music town.de)
With exprience but especially with the budget I had, I referrer that choice without hsiter.

- How long have you use it?

It's been two months that I use is the bomb! not need manual I have learned to use it in 5 minutes, the time to connect the cables etc ...

- What is the particular feature you like

most?
Numark's good is not so I mattendais Gemini. The c mieu the 3 cue point trs practices, I have some beginners galrer well for stalling but quickly becomes a breeze.

the least?
bah just that there is no effect, it says a table with ~ 230 euros effects is the opportunity, so ...

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

The digipack stanton but personally seeing the seller dchainer Paske above the CD turns more like a given ma pa

- How do you report qualitprix?

exellent, one can find dsormais 200 euros on the internet, the stuff is tough

- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...

YES and I invite all those who sitent between Axis 4 and equivalent to test

COMPARISON BETWEEN 4 AND NUMARK AXIS 500 S. PIONEER
Following failure of a Pioneer 500S, my supplier prt me an axis 4.
I wish to connect the player to my other NUMARK ct 500S.
I prcise first that the ear, no diffrence, or even in the gain even though the Pioneer is given with a gain suprieur.
The less on NUMARK is the lack of master tempo, touch the cake and clutter.
Plus, two perfect curls, I will not speak of pseudo BPM, no my taste but can be used.
A star, pause, cue, and many available and well illuminated. a simplicity of use. it possde more output numrique, a possible coupling between two axis (for info via fader auto start ditto 500 S). I am confident that I will do as well with that AXIS 4 PIONEER.
(Personally, I can choose from: PIONEER rpar which cost me my 380 (optical head and MO) and a new NUMARK that costs 210 now. There's no photo. I rach 2 4 new axis you and what they will price the time they will. I am more convinced by dj mark since before I had a 88 CDN that I never pos no problem me.Et for those who want the master tempo or key lock, direction AXIS 9 and you will have more impact.) THANKS NANCY MUSIC STATION.

- How long have you use it?
I use it for 8 months and still no problems.

-What is so special that you like most and least?
The handling is quick and easy. Moreover, it is a fairly comprehensive platinum cd with 2 loops, 2 hot cues, cue ... The pitch is pretty accurate but I wish for a jog against less flexible (question of touch).

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
I have not tried to model equivalent price.

- How would you rate the quality / price?
The price / quality ratio is simply excellent. A € 210, you will not find better (perhaps in gemini).

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
With experience and more money, I will not repeat that choice because it is a deck that's still limited in functionality. It is perfect for home.

I use it for one month and no problems!
What is really interesting with this unit is the quality / features / price ....
The deck instantly starts, the pitch is adjustable and accurate, the effective cue, there are also two loops with cue point ... the small screen is very clear, the wheel large and comfortable with a pitch bend and more!
bpm counter is not accurate tros, but still good, it is for his ears!
tap tempo can help get an idea ...
Overall the interface is well thought, all functions work perfectly ....
In addition, the plate is metal which gives a really solid, and its dimensions are large which gives a good work surface ...
The only downside is at the buttons of loops, which sometimes gets stuck when it supports diverse ....
Botons the play and cue are very good, they respond well ... (unlike for example the cdj2 of gemini or the buttons are very hard and not nice at all ...)

In short a very good deck for a reasonable price, the ideal stage to start mixing on cd for a very reasonable price compared to all its competitors ....

How long have you use it?

Use for 3 months

What is so special that you like most and least?

Plus: The perfect curls
The least: The delicate pitch

Have you tried many other models before buying it?

A single, old and inefficient.

How would you rate the quality / price?

Very good

With experience, you do again this choice? ...

Yes and no, they are good decks but the use is however limited as they are very accessible plates in price and the grip.

To conclude:

To start a mix is ​​a real pleasure, the design is nice, the backlight button makes good in a dark environment (which is not uncommon in the middle, this product can only be acclaimed.

- How long have you use it?

For almost a year

- What is so special that you like most and least?

most: First I would ca simplicity, easy access, you really have to be miro not understand how this board ... I also like the aesthetics, there is not much plastic is really well for a base plate ...
I also like the jog weel (the knob that turns ptite!) which is neither too hard nor too soft, it slides perfectly.
Its loop and these pts cues that are perfect (when is use)
I love the big buttons bright in the dark in Getic ca lol.
The beast does not heat (and fortunately dailleurs you imagine mixed with plates that heat you? Lol)
The screen is perfectly readable and simple, but too small for my taste ...
The search function, which is really convenient because the speed of research is done according to your speed when you turn the jog, which is really well thought out, everything AC lair con, but there are plenty of decks and this function is not asser-depth ...

minimum: a pitch that is not specific enough, I'm not saying that its been able to pitch m *** e, but it is not accurate for my taste ...
cd drawer, we are in full expenssion technology, then one would not eat hard to refute, but good considering the price of this plate, we will not say it's a bad thing ...
The bpm, you wonder is he doing there, useless, and nothing beats the good ear for mixed ...
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

yes, the model Numark CDN 22 mk3 was a double platinum, and the axis 8, which is the same, but with effects ...

- How would you rate the quality / price?

bah I personally found nothing better for quality / price ratio, which is to post the price you can do better but it's pure crap ...
I think this points there, Numark has been strong.

- With experience, you do again this choice?

For me yes, because I have all the good stuff that goes with complementary, ie a box effect and a good table so yes I would do this choice, if I had I would have opted not affect for the axis 9, but for beginners who want to venture into the djing is really perfect, Numark has even made a pack with 4 axis mixer with an even fly to the handsome lol: http://fr .audiofanzine.com / products / index%% 2C87332% 2Cidproduit 2Cmao% 2Cnumark_fusion_494.html

I put a 9 / 10 as a master tempo and a hard and eat a small effect in the crowd would not have been in denial ...
Essentially, the axis 4 is fine, but lack two or three key strengths that can etr (locurence in the master tempo ...)
Voila, I hope I helped people who were hesitant about the good deck ...

- How long have you use it?

Just over a year.

- What is so special that you like most and least?

The +:
ease of handling, approximately 5 minutes without manual mode.
Reliability (a lot of evenings a year, and despite the transport or use of tps nothing has changed).
Loops.
No latency.
Its price!

The -:
Missing some effects but that price pr n you'll have no or questionable quality in tt case.
pitch not specific enough.
We see too quickly what it has in the stomach.

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
Stanton C314 and Pioneer CDJ1000

- How would you rate the quality / price?
Excellent

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
I do it again with his eyes closed! C is an ideal material pr whether we'll hang with the mix and excellent pr low budget as I was.

- How long have you use it?

one week

-What is the particular feature you like best and least?
what I like most is the dpart in real time, no latency
what I like least is the Sample Rate that requires a little practice (Sample Rate excessive)

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
cdj 100, cdj 500, numark cdn 88, cdj 1000 mk1

- How do you report qualitprix?
trs trs good

- With the exprience, you do again this choice?

I rather not get my bearings on axis 9 or cdj 200, m is already very good for prparer a set!

- How long have you use it?
I have used it for 3 months (no problem)

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
as its two hot cue very practical, I really like its design, it is very simple to use
the less manual bpm

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
nn Minten first model but I tested a Pioneer CDJ 200 (and that better now) but the axis 4 is not bad dbrouille

- How do you report qualitprix?
EXCELLENT prices to the plate I have a problem of quality without meaning it reads the cd-r problem to answer the question below last wash of the small (well small it is standard) is not really numark I badly dutou counseling to all who do not have a lot of really great budjet

- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
I will turn more toward an axis 9 and a pioneer but for beginners the axis 4 is great

- How long have you use it?

I use it for a little less than a year

- What is so special that you like most and least?

There is really no more: The price / quality ratio is very interesting to say the least: the quality of the plateau is much too sensitive

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

Nah, I have also AXIS 9 is more interesting in my opinion, but also more expensive, I also touched the CDJ 800 and 1000, but not enough to really compare

- How would you rate the quality / price?

Very good, it's ideal to start if you do not have the money to buy Pioneer or AXIS9.

- With experience, you do again this choice?

With the experience I have now, I took two axis9.

How long have you use it?
I have been using a nearby 4/5mois

What is so special that you like most and least?

Plus:
-Simple
- Easy access
- The price

minimum:
His pitch-which is not specific enough
The drawer-cd (as fragile and said "eat a disk would not be refuted")

How would you rate the quality / price?
Excellent

Have you tried many other models before buying it?
I have not tried pioneer cdj 200 and cdj100s but not enough

With experience, you do again this choice? ...
I do not know enough platinum diferentes to answer this questio ...

- How long have you use it?

Four months.

- What is so special that you like most and least?

I like the precision of the pads, the speed of the plate, his soliditée,
effective for his jog ratrapage and very effective to browse the tracks and loops.

The only downside of this deck is lightly imprésision its pitch can
be annoying but can still be countered by touching the pitch bend.

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

Yes, CDJ 200, 800, and 1000, Axis 9.

- How would you rate the quality / price?

Good, but for me it does not matter in this area! It takes quality first,
functions later.

Note: For those looking for an effective platinum cd mix (without asking for the moon) I think the axis 4 can do the same job with what nimporte pioneer
(I speak biensur mix of hard-line).
I would not recommend taking the axis 9 (unless you want to lose 150 euros).
This is the same as the axis with effects 4 (found on every table one can
developed) and a scratch totally useless.

- How long have you use it?

For nearly seven months.

- What is so special that you like most and least?

I like the Particularities:
The two-loop
That the ball-and not too small to be handled well (unlike Gemini turntables)
-The size of the plate itself.
She is very facille to handle.

special medium (more or less the same time)

-Buttons "cue" "pause" and "reading", that only works as Numark, as on all other decks, the cue point is returned in a different way ...

Special features that I like least:

Absence of automatic counters "BPM" on the counter model is manual, and I admit to having a little trouble caller has certain styles of music (some funky-music).

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
Yes, only one, the Pioneer CDJ 800 MKII ...

- How would you rate the quality / price?
Very correct ...

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Yes, back plates, however, for me, I think I would choose, in the future, the model above, the axis 9 for some effects that I love

- How long have you use it?
Dj since a few months.
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?

MOST OF THE PLATINUM:

The two-perfect curls
The three-hots cues
-The ergonomics
A case-by mtal, which is trs apprciable plates for this price range
BPM-counter (despite the fact that it is manual)
-The quality of the product (even when it's numark!)
The relay-function that allows you to automatically start the other track on the other deck
-The Shock of several seconds can tap without hsiter for its loops: p
THE LEAST OF THIS PLATE

It is unfortunate not to have automatic BPM counter
-The insertion of the CD tray is made by (do not ask too much when even this price ..)
-Does not support playback of MP3 files
Bugs-A few times a APRS Loop "extreme"
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

Pioneer CDJ 800
Pioneer CDJ 200

- How do you report qualitprix?

The report is qualitprix EX EC LLENT! At this price the (even better if taken with the Numark Fusion Pack) we can all be satisfied of the quality of the product, possible functions (the three Hots Cues and Two Loops)

- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...

No hsitation, the hardware IDAL to start without breaking the bank. Hardware intuitive, quality. Highly recommended!

I've had a year, but now sold

The +: they are strong it's true, Numark is good to see good brand trs. they are easy to use, very simple

the -: ba is the low end, which frankly I wanted to mix seriously, I t ds disappointed because its the beginning it's good to run two cd, and switch between a the other if you want but really no more. To wedge two sounds at the same time it's dead.
pitch does not, we always have to touch the plate, this is a gogo DCAL and me to mix the hardtek is not possible as all the other tech I think.

yes another model of a genre can upscale or numark Plon.
frankly be better to put more money in unpeu two turntables more expensive and mostly what I think is required with the set tune sounds like a vinyl, it's true that we are closer to the original mix. (My opinion)

I can not find it terrible but they are worth all the same price.

with the experience I did not refer this choice, however I did re-pa.
Originally I bought these cd turntables to mix the hardtek and I wanted to avoid me mix cd of dpenser too much money in the vinyl.
Well dcu so I sold everything and bought the Numark TT500 and I mix and I get to do what I want. I specify that Numark has a trs good brand, we can trust the stuff.
So for those who want to run two cd and go from one to another no problem, but to mix and stalling sounds, its not going at all! ! ! Must s'orrienter to the more expensive with platinum cd turntable automatically or directly buy turntables and it's a completely different mix, it's another sensation ...
Before buying what you really need to ask what we want to do with the axis 4. if it is to mix seri, then, after six months we try to sell them and we are losing!
D'APRS my experience, you have to buy the good stuff ds the beginning, we regret it, or else if the mix is ​​not like we sold a good price as it trs super stuff!

here is my personal opinion, APRS each his own, I want no problem lol

for more info contact me

as a note I put 5 because it is good stuff, but to mix trs way ...

How long have you use it?
mainte for over a year.

What is the particular feature you like best and least?
I like the look it has a geule than others not
the fawn change tracks (the lil knob turned top left)
and the pad that is neither too soft nor hard tro

How do you report qualitprix?
It is super attractive! bought 200 euros in a package SONOVENT reu nikel (I used the box for Always carry around)

Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
ui ui but I would like the level above the axis 9.

the axis 4 is a good way to beginners trs ds they mix the grace that I have my first Russian caller tempo and m first mix! I'm getting Maintenan PPRA and without (too much) problems.

Platinum simpa to start, but do not count on keeping them more than two years.
I had two, the first did not work I have returned to live customer service she told me again the same trick two years later, warranty expired.
The second well for 3 years, and now it bug in the first 15 seconds the sound stops must be restarted several times platinum nickel it working again ...
Needless to say, at this price after two months of stalling you know two pieces, change tracks, and almost nothing else. We get tired quickly and it lasts no time maybe his life miserable is programmed into the plate?
In short it is plastic, it's toy, it shines, it's Numark.
but beware: all that glitters is not valuable.

OK, at this price there is not much choice. But really, I started with ... and I regret not having saved so many months for the best equipment. Only if it is only the low-end Denon for example ... Avoid Denon DNS1000 but the others are good (recently out of DNS700 https://www.sonovente.com/denon-dns-700-platines-cd-et-mp3-p21509.htm or DNS1200 used).

I put 1 for the year in which they served.