Log in
Log in

or

Thread setting up home studio

  • 3 replies
  • 3 participants
  • 1,040 views
  • 0 follower
brendonpyers

brendonpyers

5 posts
New AFfiliate
First post
1 Posted on 01/25/2004 at 17:25:53
hi all

i'm a newbie from australia first timing on this board, hopefully will be frequenting it a little more in the future though.

i'm currently at the planning stage of my home studio - reasearching, seeking advice, visiting my local music shop (a valid reason this time, not just to go in and talk/play guitars)..

proposed studio
with my computer (p4 2.6, 1GB RAM) and some advice i've been given, i'm looking at building with the following:
STAudio 8 channel C-Port
1 Rhode NTK Vocal Mic
2 Rhode NT5 Condenser Mics
1 AKG D112 Mic
A set of Yorkville Monitors

current set up
to date i've spent very little on recording equipment:
1 AKG 880 mic
1 Shure PG57 mic
1 Behringer XM2000S Mic
Tascam 414 4-track tape recorder

the way i have it set up at the moment is to run the mics into the 414 then run the line-out into the line-in on my PC, seems to work ok. once i have an ok sound out of the 4 track i record on the PC.. i'm monitoring the sound from a pair akg headphones attached to the PC. i'm recording using Cool Edit Pro, doing some mastering/cleaning up with WaveLab 4.

for years i have been mucking around with the 4 track on a tape only basis more often than not with very cheap mics. for the last 12 months or so i've been making the transition from tape->pc. but dont get me wrong, the 414 is still a handy little unit.

Now it's PC all the way and I'm wanting to expand what I've got, what i'm doing and how i'm doing it.

i joined this forum to listen to what other people are doing and hopefully learn some more tips/tricks on recording. so if anyone has any advice to give on planning a home studio i'm all ears! :)
Krowms

Krowms

133 posts
AFfinity Poster
2 Posted on 01/26/2004 at 02:34:45
Hi brendonpyers,

Nice stack on your photo ;-)

Both rode NTK and NT5 are for me best in their class. The AKG D112 is one of the most famous for big pressure condition, it's of course a good choice. I don't know the Yorkville monitors.

But I'm not convinced the STAudio is a good sound card... I own 2 different Hoontech (DSP24 and 2000) and I find that the features are definitivly not dedicated to recording!!!! the circuits are not optimised for routing signals as you can do it on a classic mixing table... and the drivers offer the minimum features you can imagine. I would really prefer M-Audio or RME products.
brendonpyers

brendonpyers

5 posts
New AFfiliate
3 Posted on 01/27/2004 at 03:28:39
Thanks for your reply Krowms, I shall research some more.

I've been told the Motu stuff is good, a tad beyond my $ scope though....

Ahhh the stack.. It's my Line 6 and a cheapy 4x12 Laney cab.... Good none the less :) Doesn't beat my marshall though.
Axeman

Axeman

591 posts
AFfectionate Poster
4 Posted on 01/27/2004 at 17:34:09
Brendon-

Take a good look at the MAudio Delta 1010. It's probably the best bang for the buck out there for multiple input cards.
The Axeman (##(===> Cuts From My New Blues CD
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.