LESTELESTRAT
Note : 2 sur 10
« Much ado about nothing »
Published on 01/01/11 at 06:15Sound quality very basic property against which this amp is sold (1850 to € € 2004 / 1500 in 2010). Indeed very powerful but useless (no sound other than CLEAR)
UTILIZATION
Easy to use especially if you do not want anything to ask. Amp on-sold, but this is not true of all the Marshalls? Its unique
SOUNDS
clear. No crunch or even less without adding saturation pedal. In 6 years I have tried 4 pedals to very disappointing results
Seymour Duncan Tweak Fuzz (gave his amp off)
MXR Dist III (good for the crunch but no more)
Homebrew Electronics Big D (slightly better than the Tweak Fuzz - say it!)
Fulltone OCD (ditto about the Big D)
Played with U.S. Std Start, '52 Tele, Gibson LP Std 2003, Gibson SG'61 (reissue)
ITS THE LEAST BAD''''SINGLE WITH MICRO
OVERALL OPINION
A 6-year ordeal before refourguer the store where I bought it for 900 €.
I bought a Fender meantime HOT ROD 410 for half the price and sound quality and versatility far superior.
I wish I HAVE HAD THIS NOTICE BEFORE INVESTING IN THE M. ...
UTILIZATION
Easy to use especially if you do not want anything to ask. Amp on-sold, but this is not true of all the Marshalls? Its unique
SOUNDS
clear. No crunch or even less without adding saturation pedal. In 6 years I have tried 4 pedals to very disappointing results
Seymour Duncan Tweak Fuzz (gave his amp off)
MXR Dist III (good for the crunch but no more)
Homebrew Electronics Big D (slightly better than the Tweak Fuzz - say it!)
Fulltone OCD (ditto about the Big D)
Played with U.S. Std Start, '52 Tele, Gibson LP Std 2003, Gibson SG'61 (reissue)
ITS THE LEAST BAD''''SINGLE WITH MICRO
OVERALL OPINION
A 6-year ordeal before refourguer the store where I bought it for 900 €.
I bought a Fender meantime HOT ROD 410 for half the price and sound quality and versatility far superior.
I wish I HAVE HAD THIS NOTICE BEFORE INVESTING IN THE M. ...