XL-500 II classified ad
New ad alertImages
Reviews
3.0/5(16 reviews)
19 %
13 %
44 %
13 %
13 %
Write a user review
Mick67Good quality price
Published on 04/26/14 at 13:31 (This content has been automatically translated from French)How long have you use it?
2 years
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Plus: solidity (works like new!), Precision pitch
The least: the classic color too
How do you report qualitprix?
Rather good, the report is better than many of the more "prestigious" brands that are yet less efficient.
With experience, you do again this choice? ...dropoff Window
Yes, it is well suited a beginner / intermediate level. Within a year or two I plan a budget for lev go upmarket.
2 years
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Plus: solidity (works like new!), Precision pitch
The least: the classic color too
How do you report qualitprix?
Rather good, the report is better than many of the more "prestigious" brands that are yet less efficient.
With experience, you do again this choice? ...dropoff Window
Yes, it is well suited a beginner / intermediate level. Within a year or two I plan a budget for lev go upmarket.
00
»
Atch88Good value for money
Published on 05/07/14 at 13:29 (This content has been automatically translated from French)How long have you use it?
2 years
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Most: strength (works like the first day!) Accuracy of pitch
Least: the color too classic
How would you rate the quality / price?
Pretty good, the report is better than many brands more "prestigious" which are nevertheless less efficient.
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Yes, it is well suited for a beginner / intermediate level. Within one or two years I plan to climb higher in the budget range.
2 years
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Most: strength (works like the first day!) Accuracy of pitch
Least: the color too classic
How would you rate the quality / price?
Pretty good, the report is better than many brands more "prestigious" which are nevertheless less efficient.
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
Yes, it is well suited for a beginner / intermediate level. Within one or two years I plan to climb higher in the budget range.
02
»
S6kFor beginner with big budget
Published on 05/11/13 at 05:33 (This content has been automatically translated from French)How long have you use it?
I used it for 2 years, from March 2011 to March 2013, I bought it used 150th, in very good condition with all the original box and equipment.
Have you tried many other models before buying it?
No, it was my first turntables, now I went to Technics m3d
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The +:
- The pitch is accurate and crashes to 0 when it spends, compared to technics 1200, it is convenient to return quickly to 0. (On m3d there is a button to reset to 0 it is more convenient).
- Both pitches + and - buttons in instant, it's funny that when we do sweep scratches.
- It's not specifically a +, but the cables (RCA,...…
I used it for 2 years, from March 2011 to March 2013, I bought it used 150th, in very good condition with all the original box and equipment.
Have you tried many other models before buying it?
No, it was my first turntables, now I went to Technics m3d
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The +:
- The pitch is accurate and crashes to 0 when it spends, compared to technics 1200, it is convenient to return quickly to 0. (On m3d there is a button to reset to 0 it is more convenient).
- Both pitches + and - buttons in instant, it's funny that when we do sweep scratches.
- It's not specifically a +, but the cables (RCA,...…
Read more
How long have you use it?
I used it for 2 years, from March 2011 to March 2013, I bought it used 150th, in very good condition with all the original box and equipment.
Have you tried many other models before buying it?
No, it was my first turntables, now I went to Technics m3d
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The +:
- The pitch is accurate and crashes to 0 when it spends, compared to technics 1200, it is convenient to return quickly to 0. (On m3d there is a button to reset to 0 it is more convenient).
- Both pitches + and - buttons in instant, it's funny that when we do sweep scratches.
- It's not specifically a +, but the cables (RCA, power, and ground) are not connected to the inside of the plate, you must connect it to the plate and the rest is not bad if or cables are screwed and to transport the plate, its avoids having cables lying around everywhere.
The -:
- The round power button, it blocks compared to technics. Serte prevents its accidental cuts, however, when one wishes to make quick breaks in scratch, its can block.
- The weight adjustment, it is very fragile and tends to move.
- The motor torque, slow to start, and during violent scratches, it not like the quick restart.
- The cell of origin: good to listen to the mix, but for the scratch, should opt for the concord.
How would you rate the quality / price?
For me, the 150th in time and in very good condition, its worth as a beginner, I make my debut with, I learned most of the techniques scratch and mix with. Now in a worse state than I put in it.
With experience, you do again this choice?
Not now, but I recommend this board for any beginner to less than 150 euros budget if it is equipped with a good cell and if it is in good condition.
I used it for 2 years, from March 2011 to March 2013, I bought it used 150th, in very good condition with all the original box and equipment.
Have you tried many other models before buying it?
No, it was my first turntables, now I went to Technics m3d
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The +:
- The pitch is accurate and crashes to 0 when it spends, compared to technics 1200, it is convenient to return quickly to 0. (On m3d there is a button to reset to 0 it is more convenient).
- Both pitches + and - buttons in instant, it's funny that when we do sweep scratches.
- It's not specifically a +, but the cables (RCA, power, and ground) are not connected to the inside of the plate, you must connect it to the plate and the rest is not bad if or cables are screwed and to transport the plate, its avoids having cables lying around everywhere.
The -:
- The round power button, it blocks compared to technics. Serte prevents its accidental cuts, however, when one wishes to make quick breaks in scratch, its can block.
- The weight adjustment, it is very fragile and tends to move.
- The motor torque, slow to start, and during violent scratches, it not like the quick restart.
- The cell of origin: good to listen to the mix, but for the scratch, should opt for the concord.
How would you rate the quality / price?
For me, the 150th in time and in very good condition, its worth as a beginner, I make my debut with, I learned most of the techniques scratch and mix with. Now in a worse state than I put in it.
With experience, you do again this choice?
Not now, but I recommend this board for any beginner to less than 150 euros budget if it is equipped with a good cell and if it is in good condition.
See less
00
»
tom.vinckeGood deck to start the scratch and mix
Published on 01/19/13 at 09:17 (This content has been automatically translated from French)How long have you been using?
-1 Months, I did purchase a pair of 70 eur. each.
What feature do you like most?
MK2-Style, The feet of the plates are quite effective to absorb vibrations from the subwoofer.
The least?
-The engine is not super powerful, can not get the light as the MK2.
Did you try many other models before buying it?
-The Technics SL-1200 MK2 and Numark TTXUSB (preference for Technics), there's no picture it but it suited me very well.
How do you rate the quality / price?
-For the price (the 70 plates (cell holder and Ortofon including diamonds)), very good.
With experience, you do again this choice?
No, I would spend at higher levels
. …
-1 Months, I did purchase a pair of 70 eur. each.
What feature do you like most?
MK2-Style, The feet of the plates are quite effective to absorb vibrations from the subwoofer.
The least?
-The engine is not super powerful, can not get the light as the MK2.
Did you try many other models before buying it?
-The Technics SL-1200 MK2 and Numark TTXUSB (preference for Technics), there's no picture it but it suited me very well.
How do you rate the quality / price?
-For the price (the 70 plates (cell holder and Ortofon including diamonds)), very good.
With experience, you do again this choice?
No, I would spend at higher levels
. …Read more
How long have you been using?
-1 Months, I did purchase a pair of 70 eur. each.
What feature do you like most?
MK2-Style, The feet of the plates are quite effective to absorb vibrations from the subwoofer.
The least?
-The engine is not super powerful, can not get the light as the MK2.
Did you try many other models before buying it?
-The Technics SL-1200 MK2 and Numark TTXUSB (preference for Technics), there's no picture it but it suited me very well.
How do you rate the quality / price?
-For the price (the 70 plates (cell holder and Ortofon including diamonds)), very good.
With experience, you do again this choice?
No, I would spend at higher levels.
-1 Months, I did purchase a pair of 70 eur. each.
What feature do you like most?
MK2-Style, The feet of the plates are quite effective to absorb vibrations from the subwoofer.
The least?
-The engine is not super powerful, can not get the light as the MK2.
Did you try many other models before buying it?
-The Technics SL-1200 MK2 and Numark TTXUSB (preference for Technics), there's no picture it but it suited me very well.
How do you rate the quality / price?
-For the price (the 70 plates (cell holder and Ortofon including diamonds)), very good.
With experience, you do again this choice?
No, I would spend at higher levels
. See less
00
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Gemini DJ
- Model: XL-500 II
- Category: Turntables
- Added in our database on: 07/24/2003
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in DJ players
Other names: xl 500 ii, xl500ii, xl500 ii, xl 500ii, xl 500 2