Become a member
Become a member

or
Continue with Google
Log in
Log in

or
Log in using a Google account
Add this product to
  • Mon ancien matos
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Gemini DJ XL-500 II
Images
1/48

All user reviews for the Gemini DJ XL-500 II

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Filter
Keywords
Average Score:
( 3/5 based on 16 reviews )
3 reviews
19 %
2 reviews
13 %
7 reviews
44 %
2 reviews
13 %
2 reviews
13 %
Write a user review
Value For Money : Excellent
Users reviews
  • Mick67Mick67

    Good quality price

    Gemini DJ XL-500 IIPublished on 04/26/14 at 13:31
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    How long have you use it?

    2 years

    What is the particular feature you like best and least?
    Plus: solidity (works like new!), Precision pitch
    The least: the classic color too

    How do you report qualitprix?
    Rather good, the report is better than many of the more "prestigious" brands that are yet less efficient.

    With experience, you do again this choice? ...dropoff Window
    Yes, it is well suited a beginner / intermediate level. Within a year or two I plan a budget for lev go upmarket.
  • Atch88Atch88

    Good value for money

    Gemini DJ XL-500 IIPublished on 05/07/14 at 13:29
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    How long have you use it?

    2 years

    What is the particular feature you like best and least?
    Most: strength (works like the first day!) Accuracy of pitch
    Least: the color too classic

    How would you rate the quality / price?
    Pretty good, the report is better than many brands more "prestigious" which are nevertheless less efficient.

    With experience, you do again this choice? ...
    Yes, it is well suited for a beginner / intermediate level. Within one or two years I plan to climb higher in the budget range.
  • S6kS6k

    For beginner with big budget

    Gemini DJ XL-500 IIPublished on 05/11/13 at 05:33
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    How long have you use it?

    I used it for 2 years, from March 2011 to March 2013, I bought it used 150th, in very good condition with all the original box and equipment.

    Have you tried many other models before buying it?

    No, it was my first turntables, now I went to Technics m3d

    What is the particular feature you like best and least?

    The +:

    - The pitch is accurate and crashes to 0 when it spends, compared to technics 1200, it is convenient to return quickly to 0. (On m3d there is a button to reset to 0 it is more convenient).

    - Both pitches + and - buttons in instant, it's funny that when we do sweep scratches.

    - It's not specifically a +, but the cables (RCA, power, a…
    Read more
    How long have you use it?

    I used it for 2 years, from March 2011 to March 2013, I bought it used 150th, in very good condition with all the original box and equipment.

    Have you tried many other models before buying it?

    No, it was my first turntables, now I went to Technics m3d

    What is the particular feature you like best and least?

    The +:

    - The pitch is accurate and crashes to 0 when it spends, compared to technics 1200, it is convenient to return quickly to 0. (On m3d there is a button to reset to 0 it is more convenient).

    - Both pitches + and - buttons in instant, it's funny that when we do sweep scratches.

    - It's not specifically a +, but the cables (RCA, power, and ground) are not connected to the inside of the plate, you must connect it to the plate and the rest is not bad if or cables are screwed and to transport the plate, its avoids having cables lying around everywhere.

    The -:

    - The round power button, it blocks compared to technics. Serte prevents its accidental cuts, however, when one wishes to make quick breaks in scratch, its can block.

    - The weight adjustment, it is very fragile and tends to move.

    - The motor torque, slow to start, and during violent scratches, it not like the quick restart.

    - The cell of origin: good to listen to the mix, but for the scratch, should opt for the concord.

    How would you rate the quality / price?

    For me, the 150th in time and in very good condition, its worth as a beginner, I make my debut with, I learned most of the techniques scratch and mix with. Now in a worse state than I put in it.

    With experience, you do again this choice?

    Not now, but I recommend this board for any beginner to less than 150 euros budget if it is equipped with a good cell and if it is in good condition.
    See less
  • tom.vincketom.vincke

    Good deck to start the scratch and mix

    Gemini DJ XL-500 IIPublished on 01/19/13 at 09:17
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    How long have you been using?
    -1 Months, I did purchase a pair of 70 eur. each.

    What feature do you like most?
    MK2-Style, The feet of the plates are quite effective to absorb vibrations from the subwoofer.
    The least?
    -The engine is not super powerful, can not get the light as the MK2.

    Did you try many other models before buying it?
    -The Technics SL-1200 MK2 and Numark TTXUSB (preference for Technics), there's no picture it but it suited me very well.

    How do you rate the quality / price?
    -For the price (the 70 plates (cell holder and Ortofon including diamonds)), very good.

    With experience, you do again this choice?
    No, I would spend at higher levels :).
    Read more
    How long have you been using?
    -1 Months, I did purchase a pair of 70 eur. each.

    What feature do you like most?
    MK2-Style, The feet of the plates are quite effective to absorb vibrations from the subwoofer.
    The least?
    -The engine is not super powerful, can not get the light as the MK2.

    Did you try many other models before buying it?
    -The Technics SL-1200 MK2 and Numark TTXUSB (preference for Technics), there's no picture it but it suited me very well.

    How do you rate the quality / price?
    -For the price (the 70 plates (cell holder and Ortofon including diamonds)), very good.

    With experience, you do again this choice?
    No, I would spend at higher levels :).
    See less
  • LE_PRETRELE_PRETRE

    A plate to practice

    Gemini DJ XL-500 IIPublished on 11/13/11 at 07:12
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    How long have you use it?
    10 years.

    Have you tried many other models before buying it?
    TSB courrroie, STANTON, VESTAX, TECHNICS.

    What is so special that you love the most, least?
    Given the imprecise pitch, no real engine torque, flicker rotten and therefore virtually impossible to stall "live" without using his fingers surgically ....... I had to learn very well preview and Petre very good with my fingers, when I suddenly started to mix on the TRUE, I became a real machine (like metronome).

    So yes, to begin in the gallery with matoss (also very cheap) worth!

    How would you rate the quality / price?
    Really good.

    With experience, you do again this choice?
    To start and …
    Read more
    How long have you use it?
    10 years.

    Have you tried many other models before buying it?
    TSB courrroie, STANTON, VESTAX, TECHNICS.

    What is so special that you love the most, least?
    Given the imprecise pitch, no real engine torque, flicker rotten and therefore virtually impossible to stall "live" without using his fingers surgically ....... I had to learn very well preview and Petre very good with my fingers, when I suddenly started to mix on the TRUE, I became a real machine (like metronome).

    So yes, to begin in the gallery with matoss (also very cheap) worth!

    How would you rate the quality / price?
    Really good.

    With experience, you do again this choice?
    To start and perfect for 3 years: YES!
    See less
  • Dj PieroDj Piero

    Gemini DJ XL-500 IIPublished on 07/24/04 at 03:40
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    - How long have you use it? I do not use more
    - What is so special that you like most and least? The +: pitch + / - 10%, minimum: couple rather low, big brakes, average reliability
    - How would you rate the quality / price? - Medium
  • Anonymous

    Gemini DJ XL-500 IIPublished on 11/10/04 at 02:49
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    HAAAAAAAAAAAAARGGGGGGGG !!!!!!!!!!!!! It's dobe. I do not longer used. Compared to the technics, it inscratchable ... For the mix is ​​also the shit with a + -10% imprcis too soft.
    She jumps every time a malqrs quilibrage arm concentieux trs.
    If I had to find myself in the store and I bought it I run away ... To avoid absolutely a DJ scratch ...
  • guiilllguiilll

    Gemini DJ XL-500 IIPublished on 06/09/05 at 06:20
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    A year and a half I lai jen little more pitch Extremely inaccurate, as I do not mix and scratch, the couple is bad but I moderate my opinion ngatif by lower prices, because I washed buy 230 Now what cost c 130 a good deal for qqun who just wants to mix and not too many as four.
  • dj bibifuckdj bibifuck

    Gemini DJ XL-500 IIPublished on 07/20/06 at 08:32
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Salu!
    good this deck c pa ca ouff May will I have to start two years against u I bought new and ca, ca pa pass because at the time I could buy stuff almost pro opportunities.
    Default: couple, shelf stability, pitch crap
    Quality: from afar they look like MK2 and c all, if they moved in two years pa
    Council made com pa saved me a little more and bought the real stuff, your Djing évolura much faster even if working with the wrong cam ca that you must compensate technically more c platinum will find a bar or a box: no way
  • vinz-salahvinz-salah

    Gemini DJ XL-500 IIPublished on 10/22/06 at 02:19
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    - How long have you use it?
    about a year and a half
    - What is the particular feature you like best and least?
    the least torque is not strong but enough to rev scratch
    - Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
    yes omnitronnic and technics mkII and I am a gemini bst pr4.5 xl500II
    - How do you report qualitprix?
    trs is good for small budjet who engage in this spineless scratch and mix
    - With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
    now that I have passed the bases I have more the usefulness but she does very practical!!
    http://www.speedyshare.com/740882608.html
    Read more
    - How long have you use it?
    about a year and a half
    - What is the particular feature you like best and least?
    the least torque is not strong but enough to rev scratch
    - Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
    yes omnitronnic and technics mkII and I am a gemini bst pr4.5 xl500II
    - How do you report qualitprix?
    trs is good for small budjet who engage in this spineless scratch and mix
    - With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
    now that I have passed the bases I have more the usefulness but she does very practical!!
    http://www.speedyshare.com/740882608.html
    See less
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.