Become a member
Become a member

or
Continue with Google
Log in
Log in

or
Log in using a Google account
Add this product to
  • Mon ancien matos
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Jackson JS32 Kelly
Images
1/5

All user reviews for the Jackson JS32 Kelly

V/XPL/FB Shaped Guitar from Jackson belonging to the JS series.

Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Keywords
Average Score:
(3/5 based on 1 review)
1 review
100 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • HatsubaiHatsubai

    Lower end Kelly

    Jackson JS32 KellyPublished on 11/03/11 at 17:05
    The JS32 series is pretty cool for the price, but there are a lot of things about them that can make them a bit hit or miss at times. They're not the worst guitars that Jackson makes, but they're also not the best. The guitar features an alder body, a maple neck with a rosewood fretboard, 24 extra jumbo frets, sharkfin inlays, a licensed floyd rose bridge, two humbucker configuration, one volume, one tone and a three way switch.

    UTILIZATION

    One thing about these Kellys is that you have to like how they feel. If you're a fan of Explorer style body shapes, you'll probably enjoy this guitar. The fretwork on this was pretty good. The frets weren't perfectly level, but they were decent......
    Read more
    The JS32 series is pretty cool for the price, but there are a lot of things about them that can make them a bit hit or miss at times. They're not the worst guitars that Jackson makes, but they're also not the best. The guitar features an alder body, a maple neck with a rosewood fretboard, 24 extra jumbo frets, sharkfin inlays, a licensed floyd rose bridge, two humbucker configuration, one volume, one tone and a three way switch.

    UTILIZATION

    One thing about these Kellys is that you have to like how they feel. If you're a fan of Explorer style body shapes, you'll probably enjoy this guitar. The fretwork on this was pretty good. The frets weren't perfectly level, but they were decent enough to where it would be fine for most people. If you're into micro-action, it'll probably need a fret level. The floyd rose on this is a licensed bridge, and it's not as good as the higher end bridges. If you're planning on keeping this guitar, you'll want to replace this bridge with something else. One word of advice: if you do decide to replace the bridge, replace the studs and inserts. They also attribute to tone, and the bigger floyd ones are a bit better sounding, including more robust and allow for finer movement, in my opinion.

    SOUNDS

    This had some passive pickups in it that I think were meant to sound like some of Jackson's own signature pickups. There are a few Jackson pickups that are quite well received. However, these aren't some fo them. These are very bland pickups that seem to lack all kinds of character and don't really deliver in terms of clarity. The bridge is pretty much a mess in terms of frequencies. The neck didn't do anything for me at all. I wasn't able to get that smooth lead tone I wanted, and cleans sucked as well. If you're going to keep this guitar, a pickup swap will be needed.

    OVERALL OPINION

    The Kelly shape is a unique take on the Explorer, and not many people offer guitars like this. As a result, you're forced to stick with Jackson for the lower end guitars, and I don't feel they're quite as good as, say, ESP's LTD line up at around the time price. That said, if you find a good one of these, it can be a decent player.
    See less
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Website preferences
We store your preferences so that you do not have to re-enter them every time your come back (forums options, dark or light theme, classifieds filter, standard or buzz news, newsletters popups...).
Log in
This one makes sure you don't have to re-enter your credentials every time you visit Audiofanzine.
Analytics
This data allows us to understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :)

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.

Website preferences

We store your preferences so that you do not have to re-enter them every time your come back (forums options, dark or light theme, classifieds filter, standard or buzz news, newsletters popups...).

Log in

This one makes sure you don't have to re-enter your credentials every time you visit Audiofanzine.

Analytics

This data allows us to understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :)


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.