Filter
Our members also liked:
3.9/5(11 reviews)
36 %
18 %
27 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
JoPublished on 02/22/14 at 00:18 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use the SM58 since 1970 there has never dropped me with a more than good, I find it a very good investment.02
millemiumA scenic disaster
Published on 02/20/14 at 10:01 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I has this type of "craft" voice destruction my problem is not the transmitter or receiver is not the sm 58 is old and beyond and it survives only thanks to its reputation for years 70-80 yes to the time it was a big change in the field of automatic gain but now forget this thing .... M for a new generation as the sm 58 beta 58 and even n have never evolve over Time is always the same capsule thirty years ago how old nothing but old so I buy to compare AKG PW 45 hf and surprise it is superior in sound quality and does not hang in front of a feedback return (finally bcp slower than bcp shure I gain more thanks to the AKG) The sennheiser is not in my price range, it is a 200 + € I decided to …Read moreI has this type of "craft" voice destruction my problem is not the transmitter or receiver is not the sm 58 is old and beyond and it survives only thanks to its reputation for years 70-80 yes to the time it was a big change in the field of automatic gain but now forget this thing .... M for a new generation as the sm 58 beta 58 and even n have never evolve over Time is always the same capsule thirty years ago how old nothing but old so I buy to compare AKG PW 45 hf and surprise it is superior in sound quality and does not hang in front of a feedback return (finally bcp slower than bcp shure I gain more thanks to the AKG) The sennheiser is not in my price range, it is a 200 + € I decided to see the Samson Q7 Hani at a price of 155 euros and a great surprise as its not this feedback that happiness so sorry for the Conservatives I keep these two model (Samson and AKG) and I fired two shure yes in life must leave the beaten track and stop believing that shure is a legend not I think their sales department was very efficient so it!See less25
clarkeTop
Published on 01/17/13 at 07:50 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 1 year and a half.
I had the normal aupravant SM 58.
The only downside is that it eats batteries!
The sound is top, no interference, the range is great.
In short, a must for stage mics.00
Jeannot37Excellent
Published on 04/24/12 at 00:10 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Purchased in 2004, It makes me service since that time.
I had a problem (which is rare Shure) at baseline. More sound.
The Service has taken the problem in hand and 15 days later, my camera was operating again and since then never had any problems.
I must say that I do not use it every day. But when I need it, it's there.
With his cell SM58, it is perfect for voice, but also for animation.
A little pricey, but it's good.
If I buy another, it will be the same, but with a cell BETA58.11
LogloReliable, but average sound quality
Published on 04/24/12 at 14:28 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Use for 5 years.
I used a set with sennheiser headset that I thought was great.
The SM58 cartridge sticking well to the voice of the singer, I wanted the equivalent Shure.
The connection is reliable up to 30/40 meters. It never answers, not breathing.
The sound quality is limited by the RF link. It was the perception of a muffled sound, lacking clarity and dynamics.
In short, the gap with a wired SM58 is enormous.
On the edge of requiring mobility, I use it anyway. For other songs, we go on wired mics (Shure or t-bone), as the musical style.
For 500 euros, I expected much better sound reproduction. I find the price / quality ratio very average. To me, the sound quality wou…Read moreUse for 5 years.
I used a set with sennheiser headset that I thought was great.
The SM58 cartridge sticking well to the voice of the singer, I wanted the equivalent Shure.
The connection is reliable up to 30/40 meters. It never answers, not breathing.
The sound quality is limited by the RF link. It was the perception of a muffled sound, lacking clarity and dynamics.
In short, the gap with a wired SM58 is enormous.
On the edge of requiring mobility, I use it anyway. For other songs, we go on wired mics (Shure or t-bone), as the musical style.
For 500 euros, I expected much better sound reproduction. I find the price / quality ratio very average. To me, the sound quality would not justify investing more than 150 euros.
Having bought by mail, I regret not having returned. But hey, it's done is done ...See less60
Nico53no ... to avoid.
Published on 04/08/12 at 12:30 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I already came across this model in different variations (cell BETA58A and SM58), in use on lead vocals in concert, on the variety and jazz.
I tried other references to older series Shure ... and I think the quality has clearly deteriorated in similar price range in recent years.
It's cheap, lightweight, but strong for the receiver ... even if the AC adapter let you down sooner or later (wiring fragile, as usual).
... but the carrier is poorly designed ... the gain of the issue is not really adjustable, except with the little switch-10dB, we would have liked to see it extended to a position-20dB ... because it still manages to saturate the RF carrier ... all because of a small resis…Read moreI already came across this model in different variations (cell BETA58A and SM58), in use on lead vocals in concert, on the variety and jazz.
I tried other references to older series Shure ... and I think the quality has clearly deteriorated in similar price range in recent years.
It's cheap, lightweight, but strong for the receiver ... even if the AC adapter let you down sooner or later (wiring fragile, as usual).
... but the carrier is poorly designed ... the gain of the issue is not really adjustable, except with the little switch-10dB, we would have liked to see it extended to a position-20dB ... because it still manages to saturate the RF carrier ... all because of a small resistance CMS incorrectly calibrated within the transmitters in this series ... known problem and easily solved, but never solved: the business of shure is quite nauseating about this range.
To be clear: RF technologies are mastered and now it would be easy for Shure to make a product usable in a semi-pro, pro to see a similar price ... but Shure has always had an intermediate range, more expensive, quite unnecessarily more bling too (with an LCD display on the front of the receiver) facing these users ...
But now, a good system is expensive now ... HF and this thing is not a good system for HF musical application.
You want a good mic? Take a wire ... for the same price, you will have a unique quality, Shure, or elsewhere.See less41
Anonymous Published on 06/16/05 at 04:33 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Very easy to use because it automatically searches frquences free. It DTECT even the frequency thereof to avoid TNT !!!!! (Which do not Sennhiser).01- Anonymous Published on 06/16/05 at 04:34 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Very easy to use because it automatically searches frquences free. It DTECT even the frequency thereof to avoid TNT !!!!! (Which do not Sennhiser). cf test in the press01
- 650r2Published on 10/29/08 at 16:06 (This content has been automatically translated from French)- How long have you use it?
3 years and a half
- What is so special that you like most and least?
I like the low battery, for it twists against its very easy
-Have you tried many other models before buying it?
a few ... I trusted shure
- How would you rate the quality / price?
bof
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
not really, no! I bought it to provide benefits in rap and he does not, it twists the sound very quickly. Of only 1 singer pushes a bit too saturated in it, it has a built-in compression and it's not very nice, the sound is richly saturated.
Good to be said for the defense of the rapper that some micro area (or elsewhere) bellow, suck the microphon…Read more- How long have you use it?
3 years and a half
- What is so special that you like most and least?
I like the low battery, for it twists against its very easy
-Have you tried many other models before buying it?
a few ... I trusted shure
- How would you rate the quality / price?
bof
With experience, you do again this choice? ...
not really, no! I bought it to provide benefits in rap and he does not, it twists the sound very quickly. Of only 1 singer pushes a bit too saturated in it, it has a built-in compression and it's not very nice, the sound is richly saturated.
Good to be said for the defense of the rapper that some micro area (or elsewhere) bellow, suck the microphone, see vomit in it so it suits them.
I tested it on a singer with a great voice and the same ... it's twists.
At most it can be on the conference or to a supermarket.
In hf I prefer sennheiser!See less21 - JujumixPublished on 03/03/09 at 02:41 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for one month
What I like most is that no cheating is found in many HF sound of classic SM58 and it is easy to implement.
At first I had to use because of the lack Aprioris setting squelch and modulation level (10db attenuator in the head only!) But I must admit the knowledge of Shure going to the point that the quality (on the SM 58) is there without taking the head
What I like least: it is not rack without being an expert in DIY!
I have Sennheiser EW135 and LDS (Adam Hall) HWS 100.
The price / quality ratio is very average, that's what lowers the rating finale.Je not regret this purchase00 - vincent62731Published on 01/04/10 at 11:11 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Hello I recently. Very nice concept. Very easy to use. This is my first SM58, sound level, have va.Je test 2 times in two rooms and I'm DIFFERENT pleasantly surprised by the microphone: it does not hang at all, it You really want it, and its quality of sound is incredible. I now understand the title.
There is a CI Lger blows gain lev. So small dception. But still a good product. I put him 8 / 10 was because of breath00