Marshall 1922 - guillume's review
translatedWell actually it's pretty bad ... I ais use with pre-amp TriAxis and a mesa 50/50 poweramp for 1 year. it really lacks bass ... again, it is given for ... well with only 150w a cannal 50w 50/50…
Marshall TSLC212 - " THE sound, without breaking your back: great."
translatedI bought it at Thotho (well-known German mag) for 90 grand less than the mag Toulouse .In May 2008. I had all sorts of combos, or t ^ your cabs and front; I had a Marshall 4x12 cab / 300W JCM800 of…
Marshall 1922 - " 1922 a solid cab"
translatedI use it for ... pfff .... more than 15 years ... Well it was coupled to a Boss multi-effects and a power amp Marshall Valvestate 8080. He did his taf ... Now I connected to a JCM 900 combo. …
Marshall JVMC212 - " The perfect cab!"
translatedI use it for a very short time, and this time only at home. Soon I testerais the beast on stage. I have not tried many other models. I used to have a Marshall 4x12 cab with the "famous" G12T-75. …
Marshall 1966B - " Very good marshall cab 212"
translatedAcquired in September 2012. I guess it dates from the 1980s' Form quite square, closed (61 X 63 cm) from afar it looks like a kind 412 1960, 2 HP being diagonal handles on the sides. I had obviou…
Marshall 1936 - Sl!pKoRn's review
translatedSpeakers: 2x12 G12T-75W S88 Power output: 150 Watts (2x75W) Impedance: Mono / Stereo options: stereo 16 ohm / 8 ohm mono Dimensions: 600mm x 750mm x 310 mm Weight: 24.6 Kg Anyone knowing a…
Marshall 1922 - jasonse's review
translatedHP celestion 12 " 2 large grips for transportation I use 2 for a good Stereo AVOP. Very simple config 2 between the rear jack Excellent record of all frquences I like (I have two)
Marshall 1922 - fot's review
translatedTrs good speaker. It is still quite soft in sound, but it is closed derrire, even though it sends qd to be provided as long it takes. Scniquement has been less than a Randall 4x12, but hey, it's not …
Marshall 1922 - revola's review
translatedThis is a good speaker. HP celestion ... The sound is typical Marshall trs. It's simple, if you Marshall's flat, you want an extension of your speaker or your head combo amp and you do not want / c…
Marshall 1936 - Z3r0's review
translatedI use it for 6 months and jai quickly chang the HP trs for Fanes hand because I was looking for Celestion Vintage 30 CTAIT but too expensive. The Original HP are pretty good but lack a little precisi…
Marshall 1922 - imrryr's review
translatedBaffle 2 hp clstion gt12/75 (such as 1936 and 1960a)! Small and lightweight, convenient transport, sounds good as long as you do not send him too! I am mtalleux and marshall is rock! too much gai…
Marshall 1922 - tortueninja's review
translatedI bought it not because marshall, when compared with peavey dj we laugh much, but because the baffle c'tait the cheapest in 2 * 12 "and about 150 W .... and that's sucks ... To think that they know…
Marshall 1922 - brui2fon's review
translatedQuality: Cheap, lightweight, not bulky, the sound is right for the Marshall sound, rock what ... defects: the wood is the medium, not the plywood as the high-end speakers, so c cheap, lightweight, …
Marshall 1936 - pierro-6's review
translatedI use it recently, and I must say that I have t trs surprised. First, the aesthetic: I find that he has a mouth of hell, it is not too large, without being either stunted. Then the sound: t…
- 1
- 2