All user reviews for the Reloop RMX-40 DSP Ltd.

* All characteristics have already been mentioned so I will not repeat what has already been said.

UTILIZATION

* The use of this table is intuitive, all functions come to hand, it takes less than an hour to get used to.

* The manual is a reflection of the table, very simple (only 4 pages)

SOUNDS

* The console does not introduce breath, the sound is clean but not great.

* The EQ is average I think, especially in the media and the kills that lack precision.
When the box effects, it is easily configurable (volume, time, sync) but has too many unnecessary effects.

OVERALL OPINION

* I use it for more than a year

* The pros:-Belle esthéthique, manufacturing clean
Ideal for medium-budget
-Some good effects
The -:-EQ very very average
-Too many unnecessary effects
-Not strong enough
-Fader buttons that flies right in the mix

* I have tested other like DJM 600, 700 and 800. A SYNQ SMX-3, a ecler EVO5 and the little sister of the rmx-40, the rmx-30.

* The price / quality ratio is considered difficult because the table does not stand up stroke time

* No, I would do not have that choice, even if the table is not bad for me it lacks robustness. I think it should be facilitators "push hard" but not the Dj

So it's a replica of the pioneer djm 500 home so for the same characteristics is adjustable with the addition of all the curves (that of 4 and cross fader) and reverse all too well that kills.

UTILIZATION

The config is simple, it takes some time to effect s'abituer and find everything you can do with it.
the manual ... y 'has made it a 2 page ... (To explain everything in 5 languages ​​,...)

SOUNDS

Good sound transparent, tan that you do not put the LEDs in the red
the equa its very good especially coupled kills

OVERALL OPINION

I have this table for one month so I do not not yet possible to comment on the fiabilitée Product
Next to the pio she holds the road very well, but it remains to be seen over time.
value for money is good, and I think that just pluq pio
I have now for 6 months and nothing moving, no problem at orizon this table is really the product I was looking for ...

I have long eSite
but I'm really not disappointed
I mix in with a sound system denon 2500F 2 mk2 and Rodec mx180
the I just got a ptite foolishness at home ..... the pioneer CDJ800
I have to put a flight case but not the djm budjet .... lol
So I headed to the behringer (yuck) or reloop
well I'm really surprised
the effects yuck nothing to do with Pioneer
but the cross fade and terrible
the impeccable bpm (nothing to do with behringer) and has idetentic djm (test)
for it is frankly much potos

I had a brief point of finally taking the set in evening rather than the rest

Now it's been two months that I regularly mix with (+ -18h/sem) and should see a long
but sellers give me extra warranty just for the tasteless and the cross of 1 year
to date of a shop after 7 months of deemed no return (Heum how behringer)

So quality / price ratio if you want an alternative to the pioneer's board I .........

UTILIZATION

Impec

SOUNDS

No breath after 4 months already

OVERALL OPINION

Impec

4 see

UTILIZATION

O very handy if you end dune hours dja fai po even need the manual so very very clear simple OF USE

SOUNDS

Lqualiseur is good without my big button in. more manageable quantity tr is starting to sweat lol

OVERALL OPINION

I for 8 months and the User For now saying anything like el bocou the pioneer 600 and more beautiful. faders and cross the dune better quality than the 600 in May and its effect parfoi regrettable and flash his useful, may pure c table club with a great price quality ratio, imagine a table like a pioneer for the month of 350euro !

Similarly

UTILIZATION

Similarly

SOUNDS

Similarly

OVERALL OPINION

I confirm what has been said before, this table is trs good report qualitprix unbeatable.
I have this table depis a year and a half, and problems occur:
Breath-in one way
And a big-trs problem: When I RULES the bass, from - 26 to -15, the bass do not move and the sounds are trs acute, and by increasing trs little of Suddenly, the bass reviennet trs strongly, and the sound is mediocre ...
The worry is that the table is guaranteed for one year, unfortunately for me, I call service, it will probably cost me 75 to 250, they told me to buy one, I call elsewhere, they advise me the same chose.J 'waits rponse importer because Reloop is "made in Taiwan", vendors advise me to take the best from Gemini 300, made in United States, 3 year warranty.

If anyone has had this problem, or if he knows the answer, I could prvenir?

Thank you

Also the rack djm500/600 ke ...
4 channels + 1 microphone, a copy of the DJM500 as this level lbr /> This is not a good sr achte that table but is very Aesthetics s nice (gray enough class), the aa MRIT to be signalbr />
INTERESTED some effects but nothing to do with Pioneer: some effects are unnecessary, the flanger is coarse, the filter and pitch shift are not bad, however, Russian

UTILIZATION

The manual is still in blister, y 'no need fawn head and he leaves three of thumb
for Access in functions and config gnrale, the t trs also a pioneer copied many easy to use, flexibility claret. Good history to compare (yet) and to a review I would say that the knobs of qualo less ergonomic, but frankly c criticism for fun because k'ils trs are good anyway: p
on the other hand, I am of the same opinion as the other posters, the faders are terrible: trs flexible race Settings, Reverse, really excellent. The cross fader is also Settings, assignable steals on each channel (at the same time, I find as a normal option) and a cut high / medium / low for each channel, not bad

After a few years, always no complaints about ergonomics, but I must admit that I do not use a lot of options such as reverse some of the knobs

SOUNDS

Trs little breath, qualiseurs effective at the cut (-26dB c not bad at all) would have more if they went up t 26 dB in the other direction, to the old vinyl can serve as a, o the 9 / 10

ars 3 years of use: knobs always as efficient and flexible, not the wrong, however attention to the buttons of the cross fader assignment: it may take the dusts and ill let the sound (sputum) but a little cleaning and leaves without a problem

the headphone volume is much tropdpendant assign the gain / channel (s) that will cost you, so its derrire dpendemment of Systm, if the gain is low on n ' means nothing in the headphones.

OVERALL OPINION

I come to the view that day I left 3 years ago, so APRS three years of using non-intensive (an evening once in a while):

the -:
the button effects became erratic: you have to press hard to make it work
the buttons of the cross fader is assigned to monitor whether it takes the dusts avoid (at the same time I ever opened the table to clean it)
the headphone volume too dpendant gain

Most:
table still functional: no loss of sound, knobs always flexible and effective. No customer service at the moment
aspect always clean: not clear graduations, buttons always stable and rights (except the effects, as nuncio above)

I use basic animation and it suits me as always.

With exprience, I would do this choice because it is an excellent qualitprix, when looking for a balance between behringer DJX (eurk) and Pioneer DJM (a classic).

Is Rack?

Yes it goes in my cabinet

- How many lanes, bus attendant, departures, returns ...)?

4 phono, 4lines, 2masters, 2micros

- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)?

All RCA, XLR and Jack

- The parametric equalizer is it?

Yes

- The effects section is it integrated? ...

Yes
its 10/10

UTILIZATION

- The general configuration is it simple?

Yes almost the same as my other table the DJX700

- The usual functions are they easily accessible?

yes no problem

- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...

We will say yes even though I liked that one explained to me a little more effect

I'm pretty happy so from a manual everything works great is found quickly even without instructions so

10/10

SOUNDS

- The console is transparent?

Yes

- Introduced she breath?

For now the happiness of the DJX ca change ..........

- The equalizer is effective? ...

Yes we feel the difference

ca on 10/10

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?

In Today

- What is so special that you like most and least?

Goodies: There's finally Equalizeur effective bcp of thing that are top on this table
Cons: reverse button that serves no purpose for me, finally for now the only moin s

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

So I try my DJX700 and it was a 1 / 2 years I had
I try DJM600 MY DREAM (but expensive for now)

- How would you rate the quality / price?

Very good for 300 euros I think it's good stuff remains to be seen over time .......

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

Yes and No. Let me explain

Yes, if I did not bcp money because it is a great table, I recommend
NO: If I have more money I jeterais about a DJM600 or 800

and also 10/10

Here everyone I advise you do not it is very expensive it is really good

4 channels RCA is the parametric equalizer and accurate in against the effects are not comparable pioneer c is the only negative

UTILIZATION

The configuration is really simple even for a beginner lol

indeed the usual functions are

Manual and clear and very

SOUNDS

No breath for 1 month of use the sound is very clear

especially in acute

OVERALL OPINION

I use the for 1 month

+ the faders very flexible

the - effects not specific enough for my taste

yes a numark dm950 from home (nothing)

for 300 euros well worth the cost compared to a DJM600 has
almost the same feature if n is that the effects are best

See data sheet

UTILIZATION

Similarly That a DJM800

SOUNDS

His pa movais too, quite clear

OVERALL OPINION

That the effects are less well ke piopio but for the price ... 300th! the more they remain still use. The only flaw that bothers me are the equations that are just a-36dB so do not intersect. heureusemnt there are two ways of assignable kills but it's still annoying electro.

otherwise very nice, here enjoyed a year since I turned it nikel.
for the same budget I do it again this choice sana hesitation since it is close enough to a piopio

Characteristics have already been reported by other

UTILIZATION

Very good mixer with a good cut, up to a mini munimum option in place, and sometimes a little too much something means that the mixer is not too comfortable handholds but otherwise it really good stuff

SOUNDS

Not to breath, it's still a reloop and oh and it's still a very good brand

OVERALL OPINION

I used it for 3 years and frankly I sui not disappointed with this machine wear level, I sold a friend There's a year and that makes him scratch it still works perfectly and the cut running like new,

The only downside which I think is huge how could you it to create a mixer of this quality without having thought about the connection area, and yes I give you on target we have taken a shit what is that by moving There's a game in taking the shot fake contact, good ca fortunately is easily repaired a small welding and it's good but it's disappointing but all the mixer reloop is the same power outlet, so be careful

frankly with the experience I Check to see all the mixer I buy in the future on the mains connection because it is a shame to have to put aside while the table-level quality is super
I will not purchase the same model of course

Hello, I want to allow people and those looking for a mixer in this case the Reloop Rmx 40 dsp, to be more guided and supported.

- Is the rack? Not
- How many lanes, bus attendant, departures, returns ...)? 4-way line.
- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)? all
- The parametric equalizer is it? yes
- The effects section is it integrated? ... so identical to the pioneer djm 600. But ...

For digital consoles:
- What is the accuracy of the sample (bits / kHz)? It's not analog.
- Automation is supported? not
- What type of sync are supported? ... Nothing except the echo effect.

UTILIZATION

Easy to use, nothing to say on that side.

SOUNDS

Not too bad.

OVERALL OPINION

So getting back on the table, I wish to explain some points. First the table is far from being up to the Pioneer, I'm not necessarily Pioneer but it looks like that's why I talk about it. Moreover, the structure of the table is weak because, for example, the effect button release after "a lot of uses," I can dismantle and it's just a design error in the by Reloop. Some other concerns are present, in short ...

What I want to share with you is simply that for the price, the Korg 402 is well above the Reloop, in terms of longevity and quality sound effects, or even because they are indeed much higher on the Korg.

Thank you for reading my mind, I hope you have met your expectations. Know that if you put the price in the mix you will come out a winner. ^ ^

I will not say it's a bad table, say it is "not bad" for the price, but if you want the reliability of the quality finish and most importantly, the durability go your way.

Mine broke down two years APRS purchase, it only served to mix techno (so no maltraitage as one might do in scratching for example) and I used rarely effects. But after two years, now they do not work any more.

You may say, has happened? Certainly! But when Reloop refuses to support the manufacturing and dfault accused to be responsible (according to them overheating) while my table turns silent 2 or 3 times a month, completely ar e and above all, unplug the rest of the time, how can be a responsible in this case?

In addition to their bad times, I rclame 250 euros rpar effects on a table that is worth 300/350. So I say, scammer! Do not buy this table if you expect a customer service because there is none.

UTILIZATION

The usage is correct, intuitive, but what he is going to put a button "reverse" cot just the headphone, which was never because of a plant? By evening, making it well!

SOUNDS

The sound is normal, not high quality but not dgueulasse either, more than enough for the sound of evening.

OVERALL OPINION

The same table it is, I liked him until it breaks down all alone, this table is probably much better if the VAS followed in case of failure, except it is not if at all.

1: it is in a rack furniture.
2: 4-way line / phono
3: three (RCA, JACK, XLR)
4: yes equalizer is paramtrique
5: yes but there are some unnecessary effects for my taste (and trans pan)
6: NO SAMPLING
7: NO AUTOMATION
8: NO SYNC SUPPORTED

UTILIZATION

1: trs simple to use yet quite complte the functions ... some are even useless (reverse function on all crossfaders)
2: yes the function most commonly used are easily accessible.
3: The manual is pretty clear but MRIT to be deeper in the section effect.

SOUNDS

1: yes it produces no sound.
2: no
3: yes it is effective enough to me ...

OVERALL OPINION

1: 2 years since I even prior to offer my ERRF who use it for 3 years
2: +: the effects are fairly clean, the simplicity-General for the console, a short little while prt
the -: poor quality of the crossfader knob (it's game time, in the button goes scratch and scratch falls into the water) otherwise the whole I am satisfied.
3: a behringer dx 626, Behringer DJX 700 and Numark DXM pro.
4: qualitprix the report is good. trs good even ...
5: I do it again if I had that choice the same budget but if I had a bigger budget lev I will choose the DJM 600 Pioneer or Numark 5000 FX ...

- But not 19-inch rack perfect fly box
- RCA XLR
- 4 channels
- Effect module of great quality!

UTILIZATION

table very easy to use design and finishing has to blush a DJM600
not need manual with a table so easy to use
unlike the DDM4000 (Behring) by mixing it breathes with this table

SOUNDS

no breath and completely transparent

OVERALL OPINION

I use it in a club for the past 4 months
I tried a DJM600 (Pioneer) DDM4000 (Behring) DSP600 (audiphony)
what I love most: the effect module is very easy to use and has a very good sonoritée
what I like least: the fader glide well but seems to me fragile: it s vera with time
quality / price! on sale for 230 euros a table of high quality!!
I would do without hesitation that choice!