All user reviews of 4/5 for the Behringer Eurorack UB802

type 4 track analog mixer with 3-band equalizer and volume independent ... I do not dwell on it, or read below to see manufacturer's website, I find it just okay!

UTILIZATION

quite easy to use because it is very intuitive, the manual is useful reading for those who do not know anything and mixing table, it is short and clear!
everything is there but at the same time you are not in front of a 24 track automated either LOL!

SOUNDS

the sound quality is slightly colored by the console I find, and the equalizer to change the sound significantly. The breath is variable, it depends on the gain came from track 1 and 2 as well as the quality of the electrical network of the room .... hehehe and yes I can already say that the result is not a multiple of super level wind but ... I found the sound good considering the price of the vehicle!

OVERALL OPINION

I have 7 years and she was very helpful, I am always satisfied aillor because I always use and it is the only one I bought!
She is in my group to save our repeat track 1 shure sm57 home simply taking a total catch of the battery, and the other three tracks are the guitars, that's all! It was connected to the line input of my laptop, it was of aillor volume settings easily and made to study our pieces is very good!
Certe, it lacks some connectivity and function, but the price would have been different! Plus, I can say that it is sturdy and not bulky, they are positive I think ... bought € 60, I make the choice if I loose because I find the price / quality ratio very good!

Purchased for $49.95 through Musician's Friend for use with Fostex VF-80 for external mic pre-amp. I've been using it for about eight months now.

1: Low Cost. 2: Phantom Power. 3: Although the transformer/power supply is external, at least it isn't a "wall wart." 4: 3-band eq per channel.

No on/off switch. To power up, you plug it in, to power off you unplug it. This seems like a ridiculous way to cut manufacturing costs by eliminating a simple on-off cut to the internal main circuit.

The quality of the construction seems fairly solid, but I purchased this for use in a home studio environment simply as a low-cost two-channel pre-amp with phantom power. For that purpose, it gets the job done.

Behringer seems to inspire feelings of rage and anger on the part of some. Problems cited in other forums seem to indicate uneven quality control practices at best. This is the only Behringer unit I found uniformly praised as a mic pre-amp on the Fostex forum at homerecording.com. Some people have cited noise problems, but I have found from experience the noise problems seem to stem from using poorly shielded and/or excessively long patch cables from the mixer to the recording unit. I have found that switching to a high-quality, well-shielded cable of less than 3-feet in length eliminates any noise problem. I have found in my environment that keeping the patch cables in the signal chain to under 1-foot in length seems to approach an ideal.
While I have no negative opinions of this Behringer unit in terms of overall quality, if I had to purchase a mixer or mic pre-amp knowing what I know now, I probably would not pick this unit simply for its lack of an on-off switch. That is the one flaw that keeps me from rating this unit a solid 5. The best I can give it is a 4.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

For specifications, see the website or other advice.

It has everything I need when I bought it (a guitar and a microphone) and I could add a keyboard. However, once you want to put more mircos and have more things, one is quickly limited.

UTILIZATION

Setup could not be more simple, you plug and play it. The manual is frankly not good but otherwise, yes, I find it well done.

All functions are accessible, really nothing complicated. Even as my first table, I knew immediately use it.

SOUNDS

Is it transparent?
It really depends on what you plug it.

The equalizer is not very effective, but good enough for a beginner can make some very simple fixes.

There are still a lot of breath when you push a little .... This is the most negative point on this console.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a year, and this is my first table. So I do not beauocup evidence to judge ...
But now I need to connect more and more mircos, I have a number table to record the tracks separately.

The value for money is very good. In its price range, is a very good console.

With experience, the choice I would do the same budget and for the same uage, yes. Besides, I keep it for wholes beautiful little voice in guitar concerts in small places.

I am not competent enough to talk about that

UTILIZATION

Personally, I'm really a beginner with a beginner, and I went around without special difficulties ... especially since the manual is 5 pages and read it quickly, then unless you are very lazy ...

SOUNDS

I understand that some people find completely transparent. I plugged myself an electro-acoustic top and although I'm not an expert when I find the sound even warmer. Against by not touching the eq, and they exceed 0, there is still a slight hiss.

OVERALL OPINION

I use that for two days and I have not tried before since I started, but I do not regret my choice. I use it for singing and uen electro-acoustic, so I do not need dozens of tracks. I recommend it to those who, like me, want to start and learn without difficulty with the basic principles of a console.

Mini analog mixer 6 inputs (2 and 2 microphones Stros).

There are no sliders, which are only a few potentiomtres playschool. On my table, the opposing potentiomtres Resistors diffrent when they are running which does not leave a prsager trs good quality workmanship. The seller told me they had a lot of consoles behringer dfectueuses back so be careful in the long run or the occasion. Finally 2-3 years since I use it not yet possible I never let go.

Another black spot: no on / off button ... Must unplug the power supply for the dye and in addition the power supply is not universal.

UTILIZATION

The use is relatively intuitive (normal since the functions are pretty basic). I used it as a mixer to connect my different sources on my sound card (microphone, sampler, guitar ...). The lack of teachers slider is not too in my case because my rglages are made once and for all. But we must admit that the mini-potentiomtres rgler to gain on mic inputs are not really practical. In a recording setup with a computer, it is possible to monitor the signal coming out of the line sound card, but the monitoring of other sources is disabled in this case which can be Gnant. Now I have a soundcraft compact 10 that I find much more convenient.

SOUNDS

The preamps are transparent and everything is correct. The legalization is not transcendent, but all I prfre to fawns in a software. When you have no gear and no super cab, anyway, the main source of noise is often the environment (even if the fan noise of the computer), and a amateur home studio use, the table fills his contract.

OVERALL OPINION

I used it for 2-3 years, and I have a soundcraft compact 10 mainenant I find much better.

I like the sound (sr good for the price) that I regret is that there is no possibility of monitoring vritable recording.

I put 8 because this table is done correctly in a home studio use. Although sr, we quickly made the rounds but it has no competitor in this price range. This is the behringer: there is better, but it is more expensive.

* Mono 2 plus two mono XLR see Stros used / or Jack symtrique - 48V phantom power
Send an effect per channel, with return stro
3-band EQ effective and well tempra. by paramtrisation of mdiums
Panpar a way
Main mix outputs and Control Room
Input / Output Tape to interface easily with a PC - Tape in routable for multitrack audio recording
Headphone / / Ctrl Room
External power connector landlord.

UTILIZATION

Compact, it remains strong enough to touch. The abscence of faders is not too Dranga in itself, the buttons are well rpart even if the Ctrl channel (eq, pan and fx are a bit closer. This typically makes perfect shelf home studio. pramplis The monos are correct invoice for the price, and taken his microphone quite convincing.
Routing as Elementals enough, the manual is more than enough despite its low dtails apprhender the bte.

SOUNDS

The sound is of good quality trs - for the price, I mean. The pramplis have a trs neutral, leaving many without the color of the microphone used.
The EQs are effective even if they are not parameter. You really push the hardware to run its course to make it blow. And in this case, it is often the quality of cables, the proximity of hardware numrique that night more than the same table in it. I use it for home recording and live as a exapndeur mlangeur between Roland and a vintage analog synth, and it is perfectly transparent.
Only problem, it lacks a few CONTRL used on many higher-end tables: there is no mute for channels, or high pass filter on mic channels. Too bad.
In use, the mix is ​​not quite transparent. Notice a bit of crosstalk between runway and a small breath of latent preamps. Too bad because otherwise it does well

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a month and I am perfectly satisfied.

Most:
The mobile configuration with a trs good compromise even when routing. Of pramplis well made. EQ with the Tempra. easy routing with a recorder-type PC IN / OUT Stereo.

the -:
pots less enjoyable than CONTRL faders for track, no mute, switchable phantom power supply on both channels at the same time.

8 in small mixer (2 preamp, stereo with eq 2, a stereo with no eq), + input tape.
General output, monitor output, headphone output (same output as monitor routing).
Routing can be a slap on the entrance / one / two outputs. Volumes differentiated.

little regret, but the volumes are no knobs and sliders, as is the case of the model with two more entries (UB1002)

UTILIZATION

Very easy to use. I used to mix the multiple outputs of my sound card to the general: it allows repeated have a mix of practice groups use

Big ennonce as default before: no switch. It's not great when it was full of stuff and have not plupard switch or rear panel switch: it's not great for energy conservation.

SOUNDS

With the use I make (eq neutral, no use of preamp), she fully agree.

For cons, I hope to use the preamp in Troubleshooting: gnrateur is a blast. Can not use it so attroce. As there is no cutting down a hand to a noise gate after the General!

I do not put 0 because this concerns only two of the eight input .....

OVERALL OPINION

I hesitated with the UB1002 at the beginning, and after one week of use, I realized that I should have taken the UB1002 (for 10 more, two entrees and sliders).

Now, as I does not use the EQ, or the preamp, a device of style ULTRALINK PRO MX882 would be better fits, but it is still worth double and it is less convenient to put on a corner office ... .

In practice, it is really very convenient to have a small mixer on hand, I do not spend more. The model 1002 (and yes, I am still missing 2 entries) must be perfect, especially since the price is really very low. I leave a note as if it again, I would buy the 1002 (but you'll probably guess)

on the other hand, if it is to connect the microphone, go somewhere else ......

To conclude, I would resume a second opinion: there is better, but it is more expensive

- Is the rack?
I do not think it is rack mountable, has remains to be seen ...

- How many lanes, bus attendant, of dparts, returns ...)?
2 microphone inputs - 2 line inputs - outputs and inputs and Tape effects - headphone and control room and hand out

- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)?
XLR and jack for the mic
Everything else is except jack inputs and outputs that are RCA Tape

- The qualiseur paramtrique is it?
I do not rponderai because I do not know what it means Paramtrique

- The effects section is it intgre? ..
no but there is an exit and between prvu for external effects processor

UTILIZATION

- The configuration gnrale Is it easy?
Yes

- The usual functions are they easily accessible?
Same, yes

- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Yes, everything is explained

SOUNDS

- The console is transparent?
That is to say?? (Technically, I do not know what that means)

- Introduced she breath?
lgrement from time to time but not gnral

- The qualiseur is it effective? ...
yes it will

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
2 years

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
+ I do not know, the price quality ratio probably
-: A bit fragile (and yes, once in a mic cable branch above, and the XLR conections broke)

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
not

- How do you report qualitprix?
correct

- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
no, I probably walked into a yamaha, mackie or soundcraft

For technical details see other opinions .... For the use I made her options are sufficient, I plug in a keyboard and a guitar over all the speakers connected to autoamplifiés. I use it more as a mixer for mixing.

UTILIZATION

In practice the only serious flaw in my opinion is the lack of switch, suddenly you have to unplug it every time, or solution that I use to plug into a power strip with a switch.

SOUNDS

In terms of sound there is a problem of breath when you push a little knobs at the bottom. So do not push too preamps or otherwise it volumes breath, but to see the previous opinions that come from the environment ... I experience it will be necessary to change places, to change all the cables ... to do so ... In any case, this is the reason for my lowest score here.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it now for almost three years. What I like least is the breath. I had not tried before buying the model recommended by a seller, given the modest use I intended to do. The value for money is good. But I wonder if putting a little less than we would not breath on arrival? each judge so that he intends to do but it seems to me that mixing the breath is unacceptable ...

- Is the rack?
No, I do not see what intrt.

- How many lanes, bus attendant, of dparts, returns ...)?
2 channel mic / line, 2-way Stros, 1 master, 1 headphone and ctrl room, one to each of "slice"

- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)?
Master output on Jack, rec out on RCA, otherwise the entries are there for jack lines and also for the XLR microphones.

- The qualiseur paramtrique is it?
Rglage treble, bass mdium by three pots

- The effects section is it intgre? ...
No effect.

UTILIZATION

- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...

Yes, but without a manual, it will rev out well on both the simplicity.

SOUNDS

No particular problem for breath.
In terms of lqualiseur, I'm not used.

OVERALL OPINION

This is my table Premire I had originally purchased for a collection's outdoor interface between inputs and a PC to the radio enrgistrement.

This is a console that is very well to make a recording on a computer by the collection's outdoor weight and simplicity of use

For the price, she was perfect for a small recording "studio". It would be a remake, I Rasht immediately.