Mackie CFX12
+
Mackie CFX12

CFX12, Analog Mixer from Mackie in the CFX series.

  • Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews for the Mackie CFX12

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Not satisfied with those reviews?Request a new review
Jmm06104801/20/2009

Jmm061048's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Mackie CFX12
Rackable removing protections big latrales (2 screws)
2 returns
2 dparts effect
4 buses
XLR + jack and subwoofer output (super)
qualiseur parameter
super hot and very specific on rverbe and good chorus
it lacks nothing

UTILIZATION

Very simple and accessible it is just practice for rgler The argument (bump)
but when you master it, what fun. manual in French on the Net

SOUNDS

No breath except in the very very last corner, it's normal
efficient equalizer
sound super crystalline

OVERALL OPINION

2 months
I would have liked an effective and programmable memorize
rverbe the sublime is as good as on an effect or outdoors type lexicon alesis
Soundcraft 15 years on and 10 on yamaha
quality prices, excellent it surpasses the most part of consoles in the same range (Soundcraft, Yamaha, & h)
yes I repeat the same knowing that I have a Alsis MultiMix 8 fireware to work the computer and restaurant
ayutthaya12/13/2007

ayutthaya's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Mackie CFX12
I use this mixer for over four years to sound with my group, it avcu in full sun on the beach in the cold, some moist, she suffers shock for some transport and yet a slice that cracks, not a single problem report is a War Tank! Mackie and as always, the quality of sound is to go from trs good preamps, a little reverb for exploitable scne the bar, restaurant, and collection outdoor, small festival, camping, entertainment ...
by against the reverb is not great for recording.

UTILIZATION

Use trs simple!

SOUNDS

Nickel, semi paramtrique good eq on each slice, the qualiser + output prcis general good.

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using for 4 + years and I am glad trs!
Calita good value prices, although its price argus is declining it is still a good deal as it is occasion trs strong, so strong chance what is still a long life in second or third hand.
Laps02/17/2007

Laps's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Mackie CFX12
It is not rack
CHARACTERISTICS dj nuncios
the integrated effects can dpanner (reverb) even if the edition is limited
attention: a single internal effect both

UTILIZATION

Ultra-simple
I didn 't open the manual

SOUNDS

The reserve of gain is quite limited, no real level before the knob "midi"
but good until "3:00" IT IS not too many breath and an 'no grip
the four multi-band is welcome gnral
the low-cut and the paramtric mdium practices are making the four over prcise

OVERALL OPINION

1 month
complte console, it seems to be fate to last time
construction and finishing srieuses
CHRE a bit, but I do it again even when this choice
picolo07/23/2005

picolo's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Mackie CFX12
For the price it was Mackie's everything you need so it is trs INTERESTED.

UTILIZATION

It is very simple to use and 4 buses are welcome. Go ... prs fader knobs are a little too close together (story to tell huh ...)

SOUNDS

Breath? who hears the blast?
Effects not working? Anything! They are widely heard and much better than on some machines, they say I miss it. Although we must not sr RVer a process will never be worth a ddi!
The qualisation trs good and the 100 Hz low cut and saw trs trs effective.

OVERALL OPINION

I have used for 2 years and I t trs satisfied, I sold only bnficier interface numrique with onyx. Otherwise the effects Intgr I miss its robustness also a low cut 100 Hz as the 4 bus more ... Fortunately I can connect the computer or I would have the onyx t dg.
Report qualitprix carrment excellent.
jazzystochat02/11/2005

jazzystochat's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Mackie CFX12
Well I will not contradict my predecessors when the quality of services provided by the good mixer that I (and yes .. I) used with my band, and always live in conditions as diverse and varied.
So I will ask a flat this beautiful picture, for my kind cfx12 gave us a good shot dernirement.
In a BPS, when the plug, the beautiful began smoking when she connects n'tait any other XLR Cables, it is part r vision, and excellent surprise ==> HS.
The platinum litralement crm, the gentleman told me he had never seen a (yes I know they all say a, but for once I believe him because he has the bottle the guy .. lol) and he told me that Mackie did not care about the mouths of people in terms of quality components that n'taient hardly replaceable in a format as "chips" or "cheap? " ; Op it's all the same ..
I would add for those who cry "bastard you got no right to say to a mackie" I use mostly the stuff Mackie (SRM 450 swa1801 etc. ..) as for its reliability rput and its .. but I admit that I am the trs trsdu .. A table that is 2 years old, which was released peuttre 70 times and always in good conditions (moving from room 20 to a local 20, no shocks, no reversal of cans, etc. ..) that makes me like a. .. .. s'vanouillent 5000balles that hurt!

UTILIZATION

***

SOUNDS

***

OVERALL OPINION

***
diabolo07/09/2003

diabolo's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Mackie CFX12
Purchase of 400 AF.
Analog console mackie stamp: its robustness and wholesalers.
12 slices with 2 Stros and 10 monos with medium parameter.
Effects Intgr classics: Echo, reverb ...

UTILIZATION

Trs simple to use, requires analog console.
I use it for home recording, it fulfills its function perfectly trillage / routing / mixing.
Manuel trs clear even if in English.

Some precision:

+ The LED signal of single slice on each for very practical.
- Only 2 to, I have 4 well liked.

SOUNDS

The sound? trs pro (pre) but I have no comparison except lment pourrave my mixer.

The efftets? it avoids to impact hard super expensive. They are not great, but perform their duties without causing too much breath.
I mostly use the reverb (vocals, drums) and I never complain.

Never had any feedback or noise indsirable.
Of breath? Personally, I have EVER heard.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for several months,

I like:

Gnrale the quality of product and simplicity of use.
The report qualitprix.

I dislike:

Some effects unnecessary
Flotaz04/15/2003

Flotaz's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Mackie CFX12
All pots are simple and robust.
filters on the slices are impeccable (as Mackie), the integrated équlizer surprising efficiency (live test).
The built-in effects are really honorable quality (I especially used the chorus in use homestudio) even if they do not equal a multi-course effect to € 1000. I read on the previous opinion that they were "inaudible" but I think the guy could not use the table becaufe you can adjust the effect return safely.

UTILIZATION

The table can be used easily (RAM tables analog!). Only complaint is really directed routing sound, which can be a bit boring in homestudio use (but not really a problem).

SOUNDS

I use this table (config homestudio) with Tannoy Reveal and I never noticed no breath or other noise!
and again the filters on the slices are impeccable (as Mackie), the integrated équlizer surprising efficiency (live test).

OVERALL OPINION

I use this table for almost two years I believe and I am fully satisfied.
I think she is perfect for public address and concerts, however it may also meet in a home studio use.
The price of this table is not too much and it has the quality and robustness Mackie.
Faf_Leguman01/13/2003

Faf_Leguman's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Mackie CFX12
Correct format.

UTILIZATION

Easy to use.

SOUNDS

Submitted breath.
Effects absent ...

OVERALL OPINION

I used the console six months, then I quickly returned to the shop: breath, audible effects .... really.
Stageone01/12/2003

Stageone's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Mackie CFX12
No rack, it is 17.2 inches wide so I know if it's in standards for flightd, I bought a flight azvec flexible foam.
10 channel mic / line / mono + 2 inserts stereos, 4 sub groups (2), the first two posts + 2 post (effects, one of which corresponds to those of the table but can be used with an external Pross) full of inputs and outputs ...
10-band equalizer output, on each slice, only the medium is parametric (conventional)
Pross effect EMAC quite simple and limited preset parameters but not effective.

UTILIZATION

Extremely easy to use, manual in English but accessible (and sometimes drle)

SOUNDS

Equalizers very sensitive, very low breath, very powerful preamps and quality, its hot, the voices come out really well (Note the presence of a low-cut filter at 100 Hz can be activated on each track, a rate of 18 dB per octave).
Rejection of amazing feedback: under concert, a moderately high volume, regardless of the frequency setting I used for microphones, regardless of the level of reverb, I have not had a single feedback manage a .

OVERALL OPINION

I have only a short time the table is ideal for applications concerts in small and medium-sized venues (pubs ...), compact, comprehensive and sound "Mackie" is no longer a justification is a choice for amateurs and semi pros, pros, short for everyone!