All user reviews for the Pioneer DJM-600

A rack console with 90 euros thank you Brackets pioneer.
The effects are one of the only asset of this table.
The conntiques wrong plac is economical (the RCA such a little shit is not cheap but the pro, the policy of pioneering what!)
This is not a digital console as much the prtente but a analgique with its well aggressive.

USE

Buttons eq's well spaced but quality more than doubtful, hello prices dtachs pieces ...

SONORITS

A pretty average qualiseur, a sound with the breath as we love in fashionable tables.

NOTICE GLOBAL

This table is really too expensive for my taste, all fawn is marked pioneer then everyone looking, but its still very average. The sound is more rotten than the acute agrssif the mid evil dfini while ecrass no grain, and the bass lacks dynamic and drool over, to end her and team of pr -amp too low (1V 0dB), it is obliged to pushed all in red for power attacked real pro amps, but the big problem is the famous pioneer who we call her in order: his cry, her saturates FAILURE.

I think this table is a fad, tried real tables with sound warm and round with real pramplis tried a style amix an RMC 75 or 83, it was the truth table, not the mickey table seating or flashes like a Christmas tree and it costs a fortune to the dobe.

Is rack?

Not original.

What is the type of connection (RCA Jack, XLR ...)?

RCA inputs as well as RCA and XLR master.

Before this I had a table behringer DJX 700 (big mistake!)

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is it simple?

Yes.

The manual is clear and sufficient? ...

It's going.

The usual functions are they easily accessible?

Yes

SOUNDS

The console is transparent?

Yes.

Introduces it's breath?

No.

The equalizer is effective? ...

It is great compared to the behringer has to be better but more expensive.

OVERALL OPINION

How long have you use it?

One day and already hooked!

What is so special that you love the most, least?

The more that is EQs, effects and faders that are fairly linear.

(On the behringer sound starts at 7 ...)

The less that is to be careful not to manipulate the switches of the crossfader

otherwise it cracks but you really have to run both!

Have you tried many other models before buying it?

A behringer DJX 700 a table low cost with good effects and rotten pieces

fragile!

How would you rate the quality / price?

Excellent.

With experience, you do again this choice? ...

Yes it 's on!

4 channels + 1 for the microphone.
Intgr effects some of which are synchronized
Sampler
BPM truly effective
and many other things that make this table is complte trs.

UTILIZATION

The table is clear enough despite the number of buttons. Everything is clearly visible.
Small BMOL: you can not use the sampler and the same effect in time.

SOUNDS

Plug in, turn up the sound and Listen => good prmplis, corrections that cut well (watch all the same, it is not the kills), f ki everything to make an enjoyable mix .
Not (much) of breath.
Even if I tend to say that the sound is not worth a Freevox but hey ....

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using for over a year and I do not t the one time. This table will follow me still for long adventures and I did not finish him spitting ...... Sound

Available on the manufacturer's website.

UTILIZATION

The configuration is very well and allows tudi 10 minutes to know 80% of the machine.
All functions are easy to use.
Manual Pioneer trs clear (and in French!)

SOUNDS

My dception!!

The sound saturates quickly, that ds is in the red, the sound is "ugly".
Submitted as saturation recording.
If we watch out its earnings, if all goes well.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a year but now it no longer works.
All faders are crack and change, I've never seen a price on a table that l.
Troisime the track, I did not use to beginners, only works on a ct.
The operating table is noisy, and srigraphie erased.

I used to be a possdais Smac Pro 4 fte that these four years and now works as the first day, I can not see myself buying a pioneer today especially given the price point.

A Ecler nuo5 seems to me to be a good investment (it has real faders it !!!!)

This table, I think, is for electronic music DJs (house mix I). It possde all the functions available to properly shuffled sounds. It is quite impressive and does not have standard dimensions can not be the rack.
It has four lanes (two with the boot fader) + 1 micro. The master output can be connected to XLR or RCA, no problem at trs connector is complte.

UTILIZATION

You look 5 minutes and we understand how it works, as usual with Pioneer All function are very practical to use.
The effects are indeed limited, but easy to use and trs prcis bpm counter with a nickel!
The crossfader is everything! We can assign any channel, to a sampler or anything! There is even a boot on the fader or cross fader, if the table is connected player pioneer -> practice I used quite often. All faders and the potentiomtres are trs trs flexible and enjoyable (even a little too much for the fader for my taste)
As against this feeling after a while some fragility fader buttons that remain in the hand in cracking potetiomtres, etc ...
The manual is very simple, but sometimes a little confusion on the effects section.

SOUNDS

Here the large default of this table!
The prampli is not powerful at all and ds that we arrive in the red zone is a disaster!
Effects saturate quickly as trs.
I think this table is not made for large Systm unless you have a good and a few corrections prampli derrire.
The 3-way equalizer has not cut-26dB frquence not: it is a fair bit I think ...

OVERALL OPINION

I bought this table about 6 months ago and I use about 1500W RMS.
I bought it because, first I came across a good deal (750) and Pioneer is a REFERENCE club it is better now train on the hardware that is more likely to find elsewhere.
I have not had the opportunity to try many MODELS concurents but against a lot of other tables analog.
I find the price a bit excessive even when, not easy to buy this hardware when it is special.
I think that I would no problem on my choice I turned over to an Ecler nuo5

Table very complete with lots of options "asignable sampler has all channels bpm counter effects ...) the biggest strength that I find a cot that table is its practice," can be used for all options with anything and coment "
Let me explain: the cross has 2 x 5 position (4 channels and a trim, which means nothing) they can be used with or for a sampler plate demarage only downside to this one: only 3 comparable position behringer has DJX700 which the curve by knob adjustable.

effects: they are simple adjustable c assignable to all channels including the master even in smpleur I think. the effects are quite limited, but adjustable in volume and tempo.

the sampler: user-assignable to all channels at the same master (based on loop and reloop) but not so precise but hper easy to use.

bpm counter: automatic or manual fairly precise and assignable to all channels including the master

channels: three equa-band gain more. each is switchable to phono line cd ... faders are super oux Nice and it is of 50mm and a cue button on all the tracks (you can listen 1/2/3/4 channels at the same time with the master and 5) but there is something very disappointing to me ki, labscence of kills it on cghaques ways contrary to the DJX700

the master: Amplify enough as it's always in the red (com me in a box if you can not touch the amps drive c) we regret the abscense an equa on this one

micro: his biggest weakness !!!!!! the kil + c is a 3-band equa gain. the - there is a takover manual and not automatic and most of all because no one even really boring c, there is no button on / off the microphone so if the speakers were not too far away or returns, low return to the microphone and make an awful buzzing. why should mute the microphone (if it can not because in my case) and then as I turn the gain and farewell settings.

here I think I just di, this table is really convenient and easy to use and well stocked with options (default is the biggest microphone and then the master is negligible if the rest can be set apart from the abscence of kills EVERY way)
after in life I do not answer you because I have not been able to test that canned 3 months

I put him on his cot 8 ki practice is enormous! 2 points are missing from the microphone, the master and the abscence of kills

UTILIZATION

See above ............

SOUNDS

See the top .................

OVERALL OPINION

Ke jai able to test three months so I just not speculate but I can find a CHRE when even compared to the DJX700

I bought this table there is a little over a year, an APRS DJX700 c'tait a treat, many APRS urilisations (in a rack and the care its good ncessaire maintenance) is like new, but a little consideration APRS further qund I think even that much of the price of the brand, a bit of crosstalk and pramplis a little weak, it is used on a table together Yamaha 01V96 Powerfoft amplification and dissemination Nexo and everything goes pretty well.

If c'tait again given the number of club teams of the table, I think I let myself try again
DJ Merlin

UTILIZATION

I bought this table there is a little over a year, an APRS DJX700 c'tait a treat, many APRS urilisations (in a rack and the care its good ncessaire maintenance) is like new, but a little consideration APRS further qund I think even that much of the price of the brand, a bit of crosstalk and pramplis a little weak, it is used on a table together Yamaha 01V96 Powerfoft amplification and dissemination Nexo and everything goes pretty well.

If c'tait again given the number of club teams of the table, I think I let myself try again
DJ Merlin

SOUNDS

I bought this table there is a little over a year, an APRS DJX700 c'tait a treat, many APRS urilisations (in a rack and the care its good ncessaire maintenance) is like new, but a little consideration APRS further qund I think even that much of the price of the brand, a bit of crosstalk and pramplis a little weak, it is used on a table together Yamaha 01V96 Powerfoft amplification and dissemination Nexo and everything goes pretty well.

If c'tait again given the number of club teams of the table, I think I let myself try again
DJ Merlin

OVERALL OPINION

I bought this table there is a little over a year, an APRS DJX700 c'tait a treat, many APRS urilisations (in a rack and the care its good ncessaire maintenance) is like new, but a little consideration APRS further qund I think even that much of the price of the brand, a bit of crosstalk and pramplis a little weak, it is used on a table together Yamaha 01V96 Powerfoft amplification and dissemination Nexo and everything goes pretty well.

If c'tait again given the number of club teams of the table, I think I let myself try again
DJ Merlin

See www.pionneer.com

UTILIZATION

In terms of ergonomics the table is very well Designed. All functions graves under the fingers, a c references. (Proof copy Behring) A default: button talkover trs has misplaced mutes Manir trsdsagrable if not careful.
I use it every night or almost discothque and has been for some years ... I like the table at the back, once I hated .. The EQ bdeeaoup are not too powerful and musical, faders "ON / OFF" of faders have the name. require mixing with gain, many are like me ... Since it is everywhere, I had to put myself and I've do .. the effects are fun set we can do great things with the little one is the technique .. (See dave clarke, we take a yard).
the sampler is well done, sound is good.
prfr we would call a forcment LFO to the tempo of the filter that sounds a lot elsewhere.

SOUNDS

The Pioneer sound, dplorable ... the sound is boom boom, bang a drive is it's not really musical or transparent.
The EQ is too stiff ..
The effects are not bad, too bad the call filter is the tempo. The flanger is disappointing and we get tired quickly.

OVERALL OPINION

The EQ button is HS after three years, ditto for the faders. small button selectors tempo effect SOTN inoprants quickly too. It trs old evil. I have seen 600 "spit" 2x less than 3 years after its use as a new one. (Especially not a table purchase)

So for a mobile disco that table is perfect .. EQ / fader match that use. Also perfect for DJ work gnraliste. to mix hiphop trs bof for the funk is doing well.
To mix of house / techno to progressive Manir ... buy something else. is made if you knock hard techno and you send the disks quickly trs ...

See below

UTILIZATION

Even lower

SOUNDS

Just below

OVERALL OPINION

For me I think this table is one of the best mixer on marchbr /> is rack and a small effect section is place for beginners because, in case of problems an effect too quickly hide The biggest problem (attention all the same it is not something to do with accessory)
advice after having several dj who recommend me this one
I invested 1259 euro (a vassal) to buy and I have no regrets because it's been almost a year she suffered the worst things with faders and it does not crack! not even a small crack jack or from time to time

before making this choice you see in the item or brand Ecler Rodec because for my part and that of many club discotheque, these three brands are often taken as a material of good

Lio

Rackable if the achte Querre to put in 19 inches. 4 channels + 1 slice micro music, dpart and effects return, FX +
sampler board, everything is l.
Connectivity is standard: RCA, XLR symtrique for the master and jack for dpart and effects return.

UTILIZATION

She is super ergonomic, and functions well places. The party effect is very simple to use, even for the sampler.

SOUNDS

Unlike what many people might think (as eg the "technical professionals" who install the hardware in the club), the DJM 600 mixer is not numrique. It is well and truly an analogue desk. Only the section of the multi-purpose device that is ...
I think it sounds pretty good overall but not a to be extraordinary. Unlike others, I find the RIAA pramplis of good quality and quite powerful. Moreover, when I mix, the gains are ways phono gnral at the same level as the CD tracks. EQs are no more, especially that of serious cuts -26 db of course, but that enlve some low-medium passing ... The correction of the medium is not great I prfre calibrated frequency drives tape a little higher and a bit wider. It remains nanmoins correct. A BMOL also for the channel fader rising quickly: I think they have more than one race linear logarithmic. This means that a repre means good dj sound, and between 6 and 10 the increase is not obvious.
The multi-effects sound good trs my taste. The sampler also (16 bits/44, 1 kHz). For cons, the reverb is not the cleanest. It is not the goal either. We will not ask for a lexicon of a DJ table ... The filter is good, but I AIM to choose between manual or with the LFO section tempo.La insertion and return effect is very well too, especially with the track or slecteur the master. The slecteur for croos-fader curve is very well think so too. Also note a section of pr-cost trs complte with balance between the channels and the master.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it since its release on the market. But I have to buy two. For you must know it's a good table, but also fragile, trs. after a year ago on the knobs of the game Hi-Mid-Bass, small buttons to calibrate the FX in tempos that rpondent more. I prfre on the table: the multi-effect, the VU meters on each channel. You should know that no product is perfect. AIM I shuffled a sound and robust to a MAC or SCLATER home Ecler, cot and Technology Pioneer.
I plan to buy me the ending for DJM 800 coming next month on the market that it is really numrique ...