AKG D 770

I bought this mic primarily for the karaoke bar and in my past, animation (because I stopped the restoration) it became my microphone of choice ...

OVERALL OPINION

bad enough having one vote, the Shure SM58 me overload and not enough bass acute ... The D 770 fulfilled its function very well (even and especially in podcast), I also used to pre-register my radio on my PC and frankly ... it is good to very good ... equipment on loan I prefer to rent the SM58 for "cajole" the AKG is rugged, reliable and really insensitive to feedback ... I even used to take his percussion ... it's not his field too but you can also do "with" ... in short a very good microphone, for money, well made ashamed of Other brands with much higher prices!

I use the Sennheiser in parallel with HF capsules singing ... sound in animation, I find it even better, now orchestration singing, sennheiser remain above the rest, should make that clear?

I would buy if it make me the soul, which I hope not ... 12 years of loyal service applaud this very much!

Micro dynamic versatile vocals / instruments.
Bandwidth: 50 kHz 15 (1st SERIES) 50Hz 16 kHz (2nd SERIES).

OVERALL OPINION

I use AKG D770 2 of THE FIRST SERIES since their release. The sound is warm, full: it's concurrency lo'ppos Shure SM57 which is against the clear plutt or sour.

To stay in comparison with the SM57:
Tone, warm sound, but a lightweight sail on the mdium (SERIES 1), for against the D770 is trsrsistant pop noise (more than a SM58 is to say). Adapt aggressive vote to avoid pops: rappers and other "screamers."
-Guitar amplifiers: the SM57 is more aggressive, the D770 is more round. 2 All are suitable for this purpose, with a personality completely Different.
-Snare: although it remains usable, the D770 is here trs below the SM57. Too round, it lacks the incisive ct of SM57, which remains the undisputed standard in the Contents.
-Drums (toms, djembe, etc.): more comfortable than on the snare o indtronable SM57 is the D770 a heat amne serve or harm, depending on the source, because it goes hand in hand with a lack of lightweight DEFINITIONS. So to avoid mtal, but try for the Blues.
-Brass: a warm, round, well suited even if it lacks a bit of precision. The grain is much more enjoyable than the SM 57 on such sources.

It is the entry level, but with the quality AKG. A rugged microphone, which "cash" good. The bandwidth is correct without being standard, and the warm grain faitpardonner his lack of lightweight DEFINITIONS. Compar micro equivalents srieuses brand, the AKG D SERIES sounds warmer (but less Dfine) that Audio Technica Midnight Blues, and much better than Dfine s Shure Prologue Series.

Honestly? tip top!
A microphone safe bet, believe me!
I bought this mic in 1996 at the beginning of its release and never had problems with. It is a microphone that I use for singing and is very warm in its sound. It is recommended mostly for instruments such as sax, trumpet etc ... But I prefer singing in shure sm58 well for a price a tad lower.
In transplanting accordion, not terrible on the other hand. It is better for singers and for instrumentalists. The capsule cash fine, you can bang on it it does not crack and it also helps avoid the very "Pooh".
In short a very good buy again I qq days ago with the D770 II ...

OVERALL OPINION

Honestly? tip top!
A microphone safe bet, believe me!
I bought this mic in 1996 at the beginning of its release and never had problems with. It is a microphone that I use for singing and is very warm in its sound. It is recommended mostly for instruments such as sax, trumpet etc ... But I prefer singing in shure sm58 well for a price a tad lower.
In transplanting accordion, not terrible on the other hand. It is better for singers and for instrumentalists. The capsule cash fine, you can bang on it it does not crack and it also helps avoid the very "Pooh".
In short a very good buy again I qq days ago with the D770 II ...