Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
4.2/5(10 reviews)
30 %
40 %
10 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
- chauchau33
Good vintage microphone singing
Published on 06/15/13 at 08:18 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Micro singing Unisphere I star of the 70s, silver body and chrome grille, dual impedance. Cardioid.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for many years (over 15 years).
I used a lot of references and many micro brands.
The +: Micro with a very good sound for the voice a little less for the song.
The -: Micro with inter sometimes be a nuisance because the artist stops by itself and does not affect service.
The value for money is not bad for the price today buy a sm58 (then about 650 Francs). It is now around € 150.
I am ready to make the same purchase for voice spoke.30 - studiodhorlebaixPublished on 08/30/12 at 07:21 (This content has been automatically translated from French)This microphone, like all dynamic microphones can sometimes do wonders on either voice (or other sources). It is not that the micro utililsera often. A price equal, I would prefer an SM58, SM57, D 1200 and then him.
That's what I can say.
OVERALL OPINION
10 years of use among other models. Micro reliable, sturdy and less typical than the SM58 and consort. But also a little flat.30 - Herve julienPublished on 05/08/12 at 05:06 (This content has been automatically translated from French)c a micro rock pop song of year
good for screamers.
OVERALL OPINION
does not all have to sing over his sometimes25 - BBmiX
well, but small hollow in the medium
Published on 04/23/12 at 03:48 (This content has been automatically translated from French)?
OVERALL OPINION
micro beefy for live, it is heavy and resistant ..
least in the studio / computer music, but taken for low battery, no blem ...10 - Anonymous
Chrome aesthetic or not?
Published on 04/22/12 at 05:28 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Hello,
My opinion on this microphone is primarily aesthetic (because it counts). I find it great. But I can not understand why some are in hard "chrome" (as in The Voice few days ago with Ruddy) and others seem very dull. I want to buy a new one and I find it hard to see which style is "chrome", could you help me?
Thank you for your help
OVERALL OPINION
Thank you for your help26 - stompboxjon
chrome?
Published on 04/12/12 at 15:37The Shure 565 SD is a can be purchased for around 140 dollars. it’s a very good mic for your vocals, especially the ranging lead vocals. it’s a very versatile mic and is similar to a few other models that shure makes. Which is what I don’t understand, after comparing this to the Shure SM58 I really cant tell a difference between the two mics. Just that this one is silver and the SM58 s black. Everything else seemed to be exactly the same while testing them out and using them. They say that this mic has a better built in pop filter for your vocals but when using it its just like the other shure models similar to this one.
OVERALL OPINION
The Frequency response is 50 to 15,000 hz …Read moreThe Shure 565 SD is a can be purchased for around 140 dollars. it’s a very good mic for your vocals, especially the ranging lead vocals. it’s a very versatile mic and is similar to a few other models that shure makes. Which is what I don’t understand, after comparing this to the Shure SM58 I really cant tell a difference between the two mics. Just that this one is silver and the SM58 s black. Everything else seemed to be exactly the same while testing them out and using them. They say that this mic has a better built in pop filter for your vocals but when using it its just like the other shure models similar to this one.
OVERALL OPINION
The Frequency response is 50 to 15,000 hz which is pretty standard. And as stated before it’s a chrome plated mic. Which looks really nice but I don’t want a nice looking mic if it cost more than my other mics and doesn’t sound any different. You must just be paying for the chrome plate with the Shure 564 SD because my SM58 sounds jus the same. Everything with this mic and with the other mics seem so much alike from how the record , feel, weight. Its almost like they just dipped in it chrome and changed the name.
Overall, it’s a good mic no doubt about it. But go with the Shure SM 58 and save some money! They are exactly the same to me and the SM58 cost a lot less. Plus the silver chrome plating isn’t that appealing to me anyways. I would rather have gold plated if anything. But none the less it’s a good mic, if you really want to pay 140 for a mic that you can get a lot cheaper in black, would you? I don’t understand what shure was trying to do.
See less03 - frederic67
I can not myself Sparer
Published on 12/06/11 at 00:03 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Fidler my friend! 30 years of service. How to say evil? No concern for Larsen, Fidler reproduction of voices, both in Live recording. Used in discothque (noisy) and radio (the opposite of a noisy environment). I think I retired at the same time as him, although tempted by the sm58 beta (most excellent but I have less affinity with ...)
OVERALL OPINION
and I love her look!31 - ScatophilyPublished on 07/27/05 at 10:39 (This content has been automatically translated from French)It is a micro for scne.
I do not know its technical specifications, but it's easy to find on the net (if you understand!)
OVERALL OPINION
TRS is a good microphone.
Given the level (output volume) is infrieur that of SM58, but the quality of the rendering of timbre is its main asset. You just make sure to keep enough prs of the mouth because the ds that moves away somewhat diminishes the return trs fast compared to other microphones.
It's a habit to take!
I used a Sennheiser 835th before, and I do not shut completely satisfied. I had the opportunity to use an SM58 and then I have the Shure 565SD Discoveries with my singing teacher, and I adopted him.
The concern is that…Read moreIt is a micro for scne.
I do not know its technical specifications, but it's easy to find on the net (if you understand!)
OVERALL OPINION
TRS is a good microphone.
Given the level (output volume) is infrieur that of SM58, but the quality of the rendering of timbre is its main asset. You just make sure to keep enough prs of the mouth because the ds that moves away somewhat diminishes the return trs fast compared to other microphones.
It's a habit to take!
I used a Sennheiser 835th before, and I do not shut completely satisfied. I had the opportunity to use an SM58 and then I have the Shure 565SD Discoveries with my singing teacher, and I adopted him.
The concern is that this little micro tends larserner more easily than 2 prcdemment deficits, but still reasonable. It manages a rglage adapted to the mixer.
The ratio quality price is interesting.
I recommend it for anyone as PRIOR ® religion restore the personality of the voice.See less10 - chris380Published on 03/13/06 at 11:45 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Micro dedicated to singing, dynamic, high and low impedance.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for one month and I'm in love, tired after a Beta 58 and a Behringer XM 8500 at unbeatable value for money, but personalis, I just bought a 565 SD chances but did never used, and surprise: it is clear, precise, does not make too much from the Behringer, that capricious month Beta 58 for the settings, in short, I just pass it when I bought it almost by chance, it could be sensitive to feedback, but it's touch to the tableRead moreMicro dedicated to singing, dynamic, high and low impedance.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for one month and I'm in love, tired after a Beta 58 and a Behringer XM 8500 at unbeatable value for money, but personalis, I just bought a 565 SD chances but did never used, and surprise: it is clear, precise, does not make too much from the Behringer, that capricious month Beta 58 for the settings, in short, I just pass it when I bought it almost by chance, it could be sensitive to feedback, but it's touch to the tableSee less11 - sylvaindesboisPublished on 03/13/10 at 17:11 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
This micro sat in the studios of RTL there thirty years.11