All user reviews for the Shure PG58

Excellent microphone for the price. There is a place in town where I practice music and there are SM 58s there as well. So I decided to test out the PG58 and an SM 58 and they sound identical. The only difference is the SM 58 is made like a tank, but if you take care of the PG 58 you'll be fine. The PG 58 isn't fragile but it won't be able to withstand throwing it across the room and stuff like the SM58 can. You can literally scream into this mic and if you have your settings right you still will not have an awful clipping sound. Really great mic for live and recording settings. I recommend it.

OVERALL OPINION

Excellent microphone for the price. There is a place in town where I practice music and there are SM 58s there as well. So I decided to test out the PG58 and an SM 58 and they sound identical. The only difference is the SM 58 is made like a tank, but if you take care of the PG 58 you'll be fine. The PG 58 isn't fragile but it won't be able to withstand throwing it across the room and stuff like the SM58 can. You can literally scream into this mic and if you have your settings right you still will not have an awful clipping sound. Really great mic for live and recording settings. I recommend it.

See other opinions

OVERALL OPINION

For this it will be a micro 6 / 10, or "correct".
Explanation: it does not dnature voice, which is not bad dj when used for singing. Small dtail I love: the on / off button. I also put myself in the XLR for the microphone, and I must say it is not so bad, I who used to play with my wireless, at least he does not micro or dcroche the enclosure, and is better! The thing I dislike, and I speak for singers: put yourself ct of the battery, look derrire you, the amp is 100 watts of your guitar: good, bah s going to have to stick the microphone, because we will not be able to mount the enclosure Eternal. It leaves me less freedom of movement from my old, which ignores the lowest range that exists, he had no mm mark, I had bought ads on a site (do no ads).
We will our answer to the question of Audiofanzine when same:
How long have you use it? It's been two months rpt (rock band, has help for those).
Have you tried many before acqurir MODELS? Well my old microphone, and one of the range Shure, but in the shop, and I felt no diffrence its really, I ended up taking it because the cage and not silent bomb on the other, and Dranga me because of my habit.
What is the particular feature you like best and least? Most is not quil dnature not my voice, the less is the fact that it loses power, so to speak thus, when my group goes the sound of the instrumentals.
How do you report quality price? Even when good! PSE if the pros and cons, ultimately, to 50, is a frankly, are more for than against.
With the exprience, this choice would you do? Yes, I think, because like many zikos, I have a budget, and that the microphone is not as dgueulasse that has, for its price. I will be in against trsdgoute for 30 more. However, I do not know yet if I will ascend with scne has it's clear.

Cardioid dynamic microphone designed for vocal and scne, it is robust trs.
Some default sound insulation, but nothing major that price.
Lgre color of the voice to 4000 Hz, not dplaisante.
Its small default: trs sensible distance with the mouth: it muffles too qq centimtres voice with "sss" and "chhh" and "kkhh" dplaisants. To 15 cm, it causes a strong prpondrance AIGS and curiously in the "p" pop that sometimes ...
APRS moultes trials, it should be used between 5 and 8 cm so that it gives the best of itself

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a year? I like his color and his dsign votes. A 40 euros is a good investment for beginners trs voice recordings. I think in the near point me to an associated one prampli bta58A shure to try to fix my voice that I find too serious and dull.
That said, you compare a shure beta 58 and all of a sudden, you want to paste it a score of 0!
There is talk of a microphone 45 euros, do not forget!

Dynamic microphone for singing. With switch.
Technically, everything has already been said.

Shure presents him as a mid-range micro suited to singing and recording (while the PG48 is intended for speech and karaoke).

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a few days in addition to a Samson R11 and a Shure SM57.

It is less powerful and we must increase the gain from my Samson, which however is much more sensitive to feedback. It's true that Samson is very close to an SM58, but too powerful presence in the midrange and treble, with a bright sound. The PG58 is clear much more serious, but suddenly appears limited in the treble. The sound is flat, very hot, but I think more usable if the song mamque chest or lower. The switch is really quiet. The micro, heavy and well finished, looks robust. Much more convenient than the SM57 for vocals (no need to swallow the microphone to agree).

Finally a good quality microphone. The sound is close enough Berhinger but more accurate. The mic seems much bigger. Too bad the cable supplied is a little short (4.5 m).

New Value: 55 to 62 euros.
As I paid 39 euros (neuf!) on Ebay I made a great deal.

Micro Dynamic fawn low-end Shure.

Assymtrique output transformer, so avoid a 48 volt power supply ...

Trs expensive for what it is.

This microphone is a rating that dung over 50 euros.
Dj SM58 I find quite average, with the wrong qualitprix, but then the cake is the one!

OVERALL OPINION

In addition to a sound dplorable of feedback fast enough, having to push the gain donf chopper to full blast and noise of any kind, this microphone is asymtrique output!
Straw!, A hrsie!, Unusable Live, studio, rptds you use it on a console o there is a microphone with phantom power dessus.A branch unless have a phantom power supply for each, but if you have a table of this ilk, gnralement, you are not using PG58 ...

Frankly, for 25 euros you have a Behringer XM8500 is incomparably more musical, and which can be used in Live default of anything else.
And for 15 or 25 euros more than the Behringer, you have a T Bone MB85 Beta or Superlux TOP248, two good microphones that I find better than a SM58 and all remaining 2 cheaper than PG.

In short, it's not because it is Shure, on the contrary, many sitting on their renamed, they have no qualms offering microphones drums exorbitant prices ...
I'm not Anti-Shure SM58 I possde one (Alas, I do not like), but also two and a SM57 Beta87A is my best vocal microphone scne!
But this mic is the foutage of mouth! I put one because there is the sound that comes out when same.

My advice:
FLEE THIS MICRO like the plague! IT'S A HORRIBLE DAUBE CHER! CATCH A NIGOT!

A word.

Cardioid dynamic vocal microphone wire. <p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>steel construction very sturdy, silent switch, thin thickness of a pop filter inside of the ball, pneumatic isolation of the capsule. It takes a microphone signal purely asymmetric.</span>

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 years. J'apprcie its sturdy cot, unfortunately, I finally trsdu this microphone. I pass on what t said in the opinion prcdant. The seller advised me as equivalent to the SM58 and cheaper. I think it was right on one point ... The report is qualitprix assurment little INTERESTED. I do not at all would do this choice, I'd at least for a SM58 or other micro-level more leve.

See other comments

OVERALL OPINION

I used one on the liver capsule version of the HF for voice sound to speak, it is filthy (and I speak only of the capsule I do not m'tendrai here on HF, which is part of the same ilk).

Trs-sensitive feedback, and plosives, with its bland trs (DSOL for the lack of precision but made some time now and I have believed for more).

What is trs drle is that the person who had made the purchase had two HF SM58 version and when I asked him why he 2SM and pg rpondu me that the seller had says: SM58 HF are no longer there but the PG58 HF is the same thing. "

For those who still doubt shall have no it is not the same thing and did not even see ...

In short you can easily find the same (and even see much better) for less CHRE.

See the features in previous opinions

OVERALL OPINION

Frankly I was not expecting such quality. Although avoiding the song for the pros or registration, it is more than a microphone "troubleshooting". I use it in my Hard-rock group and it is quite the shot with a high quality rendering of sound.
Resistant He will cash the falls for those who do not take care
I do it again the choice without hesitation, in fact I'm going to buy a second for backvocals!