All user reviews for the MOTU UltraLite

The reputation of the brand
I am the User in dplacement with a MacBook Pro equipped with 4 GB of RAM
Connect all without the slightest problem.
I possde also a Firewire 18/14 MAudio and also no problems.

USE

Absolutely no problem with DInstalling MAC. on the other hand, be careful with Windows because some FireWire configurations are not recognized.
No necessity of reading the manual is clear interface so.

IMPLEMENTATION

The "drivers" are extremely stable.
They are upgraded when this is ncessaire, I suppose?
Logic Pro, I have absolutely no problem meeting.
Jobtiens infrieure a latency of 5 ms, which is ngligeable.
Jarrive record more than 20 tracks without the slightest poblme. I think quon go to del.

NOTICE GLOBAL

I am the User for two years without ever having encountered any problem.
Jadore compact side and being able to use it as a mixer without computer.
I also possde MAudio Firewire 18/14 I find clearer in the violins and string sounds in general.
The report qualitprix is ​​properly done.
If CTAIT again, this is a product that I would take into account.

Why this purchase:
Strength - Quality - Dynamic - Multi direct return (bus 4)

Usage: Mobile Studio - DJ'ing - Montage

UTILIZATION

I use it for more than 5 years and each time it is with the CD-install it works ....

GETTING STARTED

I note also that it is super sensitive to the level of supply therefore best used with supply (transformer) ....


I've always had stability problems on laptop ordis whether live or connect with MPCIMCIA Map.

Once stable, no problems with any software ....

OVERALL OPINION

C "is good stuff set apart my stability problem.

A little pricey at the time, the levels of the converters is not very high!

Cons:

- Pay attention I think there is some model have problems with factory ...!

- No use with Linux!

- Brittle transformer

- They always told me that it is more dedicated hardware MAC!

- For the current price is not bad at all ....


For the record I buy a week before he announced the release of the Hybrid: I had the balls ..... So be careful ... it is often SKY show that we see the future ...!


The little joke one day a guy asked me if it was a CIBIE

is the value for money of the product that has motivated my choice.

I use almost all connectors, input output jack for my compressor for my multi effect spdif, midi to my synth .. and now with traktor to play in the evenings because I bought a 828 that replaces the studio.

UTILIZATION

drivers always up to date and super stable.

I used logic, live and traktor still no problem.

I can use all inputs and outputs simultaneously with no worries latency.

GETTING STARTED

installation without any problem ..

configuration super easy ..

principle defined .. no I did not need the manual.

OVERALL OPINION

this is the oldest product of my studio and simply the best purchase I made for 7 years.

it's been over seven years since the interface makes me good service and I do not feel the need for more expensive.

what I like most is the value of his / price / flexibility.

I redid the choice a second time by taking a 828 for the studio which is almost similar to the ultralite and the compactness of lThis last makes it a perfect ally to play in the evenings.

What characteristics have motivated your choice?
The number of input and output, the reputation of the motu converters for year / na. Firewire cable to connect to my macbook. But especially the size and therefore the possibility of easily take out of my home studio.
With which instruments or systems (console, preamp, DtD ...) you use it and how connections? ...
Firstly it served as my motherboard connected to my mac and my monitor speakers. Then she allowed me to work with the hardware and now it allows me to increase my output of my focusrite to an analog console.

UTILIZATION

RAS!

GETTING STARTED

RAS

OVERALL OPINION

How long have you been using?
Mmmmmh see at least 5 7 years. I actually know!
Did you try many other models before buying it?
No!
What is so special that you like most and least?
nothing to declare!
How do you rate the quality / price? With experience, you do again this choice? ...
It is still in service returned after a year. They sent me a brand new after a long battle with the VAS. Since no worries. I think yau fake contact Firewire who grilled so be careful!

The Motu Ultra Lite is a audio interface that connects to your pc through fire wire, you computer would need to have a fire wire port in order for you to be able to use this device. If you don’t have a fire wire port on your computer don’t even bother purchasing this. You will need to get a USB interface instead. There is a large debate on if fire wire is better than USB, in my opinion you wont really be able to tell a difference in quality just maybe the USB will have a little more of a lag, but in most cases the lag is so minimal that the ear cant even pick it up. But there is a lag in fire wire too, so don’t think if you purchase the Motu Ultra Lite that you wont have any lag at all, because all interfaces have some sort of a lag. But you wont be able to tell there is a lag when using the Motu lite.


UTILIZATION

The Motu Ultra Lite is a complex little interface, it is very powerful for it to be such a small unit. There are plenty of ins to run all of your audio in signals into so you can do whatever you want to do with them , in my case I used it to get audio into my pc from external gear.


GETTING STARTED

The sound is very good, you will love the quality. But I think that the price of this unit brand new is a little too expensive. Even a used one can still cost 200 or more dollars today and it has been out for a while now.


OVERALL OPINION

There are several fire wire interfaces that are great, the Motu Ultra Lite is a great one as well, I just feel like it is an overpriced unit because its just too expensive. Maybe if it was this price and it was rack able then it would be different or if they offered a rack able version of this same device I would feel different about it.

What characteristics have motivated your choice?
Its mid-range card
IO number of interesting
Price.

What instruments or systems (console, preamp, DtDs ...) the use and how you connect? ..
DJ setup mainly
Stereo output for playback
SM 58 microphone
A synth

It worked A1.

For what purpose? What is your config (Motherboard / CPU / RAM / Disk, ...)?
DJ / Producer electronic
Mac Pro 1.1 5 gig of ram.

UTILIZATION

Stable drivers and updated regularly, without regression.
Logic used most often.
It can record all analog inputs at the same time without problems.
For latency, I can not remember, but it is in terms of perforation.

GETTING STARTED

Everything is perfect and it's easy.

OVERALL OPINION

I sold it to go to the RME. This is a sound card that I recommend to everyone who wants the connectivity and an average range.

The number of inputs and outputs, firewire, and brand reputation have made me make that choice
I use it with a macbook, can not make it work with a laptop in firewire, I had to try it with 3 or 4 different ordis and not walking. With a tower and with no PRBM mac either (of course ..)
Rec home studio vocals, guitar, bass, live rec, and analysis of its systems for taf.

UTILIZATION

Never a problem in 8 years. First on a pc with windows xp and a firewire card directly on the motherboard. Then on a macbook. Latency inaudible if the session on which you record and read your tracks is on an external hard drive. And even if the case can not handle 4 mix of internally monitoring card.

GETTING STARTED

Plug n Play
Laptop on your way.

OVERALL OPINION

Very good value for money!

I was looking for a versatile and portable sound card.

I ended up changing Pc after an incompatible FireWire controller, attention, capricious beast is on the Texas Instrument chip FireWire not!

On a good laptop PC or a Mac there is no problem.

UTILIZATION

I've never had a crash outside the known problem of generic FireWire chip.
I'm working on ableton and Logic Audio.
The six line input plus two combo mic sound good practices,
Eight output unbalanced line clean.

Latency of 128 sample stable osx. You could stay at 32 and 64 according to the power of my stuff. But there are some swings in this case too with the effect.

Driver updated frequently

GETTING STARTED

Easy install on a bike compatible driver reboot and you're done.
Caution! Cuemix to its own logic, we must forget or tame, especially on the model fx ...

OVERALL OPINION

Nor do I use this card as a concert in six years. DO NOT BREAK SWITCHES OF A FRONT!, But it's solid .. Back in the U.S. sav mandatory two-month wait! And expensive ...

I would change soon for a rm, best known for its preamps. The motu is fine but the gain of the preamp and not always sufficient, with the breath forcibly.

Ever regreté this purchase, it got everywhere! Motu is a solid, clean sound, a format convenient self-powered, solid (except switches). A good semi-pro choice, before the plunge rm

The Motu Ultra Lite is a simple, USB audio interface for use in home studios. This type of interface is a perfect way to start building your small home studio. It's definitely not going to be adequate for an sort of in depth recording, but if you're just looking to get some demos down it will do the job. There are a lot of audio interfaces out there like this, so definitely make sure to do your homework before deciding on one. The UA-25 in particular has two dual XLR-1/4" microphone preamps, each with their own gain knobs and a 1/4" headphone jack in the front. In the back it's MIDI and digital (ADAT) inputs and outputs as well as 1/4" and RCA outputs for your main monitors. It has built in phantom power and can support sample rates up to 96 K.


UTILIZATION

If you understand the basics behind audio interfaces, nothing should seem complicated to you about the Motu Ultra Lite . Once you make your initial connections, there's not too much to be aware of on this, as it's pretty simple. Of course I do understand that those who are looking at something like this probably are just starting out. If you feel lost just looking/hearing about this, grab the manual for some help...


GETTING STARTED

The sound of the mic preamps on the Motu Ultra Lite aren't all that great, but are suitable for laying down demos at the least. Those looking at the UA-25 most likely aren't going to need the best sounding preamps, and if you are I'd suggest you stop reading this review and look elsewhere! You probably couldn't make a professional sounding recording, but if you just want something with a few mic inputs to use in your DAW, the UA-25 sounds just fine for that.


OVERALL OPINION

While there isn't too much that sets the Motu Ultra Lite apart, it's still a solid USB audio interface for very small home studios where you might have this and a microphone and your DAW basically.

I chose this sound card for its number of inputs and outputs, and MOTU's reputation. I use it in my home studio basically to send out 10 to 10 entries in my Mackie mixer.

UTILIZATION

To get everyone in agreement, the drivers work perfectly at home and a PC with Windows XP SP2! I use it with Cubase SX. I used to play at least 12 and it works without problems. For the record, I have not had time to test, but I do not worry ... Latency less than 10ms

GETTING STARTED

Trouble-free installation, simple configuration. French manual found on the net. Not necessarily very useful for me.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for some months and I am fully satisfied. I had a sound card of another brand with the same inputs and outputs, but it has absolutely nothing to do. I love the size (half rack). I like least on the screen, I find it useless. On the occasion of 200 € is a very good deal.
This choice I would do without hesitation.

I went to the Ultralite as it's been years that I sold the MOTU quality but the financial means did not follow. I'm a PC homestudio basic Athlon XP 2400, 1.5 ghz DRR, dd ata 133 ...
I have a SHURE KSM27 mic, I use SONAR 5.

I am interested in this map is that it has all the connectors in a ncessaire homestudio, it is compact and then it's a MOTU LOL

The only connection that my use would have in t is a very useful headphone indpendante between 2 nd. Anyway it is an obstacle easily passable with a headphone amp or dobler

UTILIZATION

No problem on the install, the manual is well done, but only in English so better to have bases in this area. Everything is very simple in the installation, the drivers installed like any other PC peripherals.

GETTING STARTED

The drivers are stable trs, no latency due to the internal DSP, Sonar is far more stable than my old card (Hoontech DSP2000).
I put a tps that same master interface CueMix came with the card but it is useful as part of a homestudio

OVERALL OPINION

The quality is incomparable MOTU, the sound is warm prcis and trs is a purchase that I recommend all. I have nothing to reproach him, and for me it s'avre be THE card market

Super caracteritique!
Ultra sound, we are confident now!
We are facing the PRO stuff.
all the connections it takes to make the sound even more anywhere!

UTILIZATION

Super easy, no worries, 1 min.

GETTING STARTED

Driver super stable.
SOUND! it leaves far derrire the FireBox and FA-66 (see my review).
Dynamic sound impressive!
Its possibilities are connectivity and it is a little more complex than others, but it quickly master.
It accepts all types of microphones: condenser, ribbon, dynamic.
No breath, the same background pramps!
Zero-latency recording.

OVERALL OPINION

Super card.
SOUND!
I advice those who want to make beautiful sound PRO.
Stop to save up candles! return over the long Chres!

-The number of entries (10) and output (14). Microphone inputs complete and quality preamps
-I use it now for the Home Studio, but I plan to use the outputs to multicast ...
-I use it on a laptop Acer Centrino / 1.6 Ghz / 512 MB Ram 60 DD GG DD + 80 GB external USB 2
- Used primarily with microphones (Apex 415, Rode NT1, 414 ... C) but with an electric bass

UTILIZATION

-The installation was almost smoothly (qques missed at the beginning with the installer MOTU "interface not recognized after installing the CD Rom") so I used to install the XP drivers
- To date no pbes ...
- The config is easy
- The manual (in English) ... I still open

GETTING STARTED

-The drivers are stable
I use Cubase, Audacity ...
Zero-latency foot!
-Up to now I pile the tracks one by one and by simultaneously read ... 8

OVERALL OPINION

-I use it for 6 hours and I'm already hooked!
-The English manual and installation MOTU a little "galley"
"I have a ream M-Audio Firewire Solo, a Presonus Inspire 1394, but the Ultralite
exceeds the
Value-unbeatable price considering the quality of the preamps and the possibilities of the "beast"!
For now, no regrets ...

- I was looking for a sound card more "fine", more accurate than my previous models.
Mission accomplished with the Ultralite. It's lace.
- I use it in a home studio config 100% electronic and is connected to a PC running XP Home SP2 (Asus P4P800-E, 3GB PIV, 1GB RAM ...). It will no doubt be used in live, hence the interest of compactness and excellent build quality (it feels the tough stuff).

UTILIZATION

- Installation without a history (I did not use the original CD but went in direct MOTU download the latest drivers).
- To date, no Incompatibility met; FLOW (even with my "old" Cubase SL v1), which is not the case of some models of newer cards.
- The config is quiet, the Cue Mix is ​​simple and uneventful, but not essential when working in direct monitoring in Cubase.
- Hand side is a bit heavy because only in English. Even when you master the language, it is painful to have to play translator (I would rather make music during this time ...). So, just one point less for that.

GETTING STARTED

- To date, no problem with the drivers (I do not know the frequency of updating in Motu)
- I use with Cubase SL and Wavelab. Still, I did a little test with demos and Live Fruity, it works impeccable.
- Side latency ... is low, very low. It's great fun.
- For the moment, I did not test with thousands of audio tracks but the beast should be collected, given the performance.

OVERALL OPINION

- It's been three weeks (only) as I explore
- In the positive, I would say almost everything, it will be less for the manual in English.
- I worked with an old Delta 66 (incidentally very nice) but the accuracy is better sound.
- Value for money nickel. Can finally afford a Motu without eating potatoes for ten years is quite nice!
- The choice I would do without hesitation ...

RPTES bought to record or see to catch maquter vocals / guitar + pramp
barebone msi 180 2200 + 1giga/ram western digital 7200T
not very complicated to install mm childish I'd say, for against ATTENTION: srieux problem of firewire, firewire to my base on my barebone inappropriate, jai add the card (40 euros at Darty, beklin 3 ports ). Seen to this problem is the forum rcurant !!!!!

UTILIZATION

I will rpter ... FIREWIRE but big problem is my Premire card so it can be normal but apparently has often done for this card, chipset via the deprecated and NEC firewire card, opting instead for the intel , texas ...
config if not easy

GETTING STARTED

Cubase SX, everything seems to work, not on test tracks bcp

OVERALL OPINION

I've had one week, been using it for 2 days after nights of hard to understand the concerns of his that I (sometimes closer to pink noise as music dla ...). Qd a walk, the air ringing aa lot for that price. I worked on pro tools HD is on when it's not the same mm but for ptites config is sufficient. To see if the chaining works, can become a very interesting (16 analog inputs / outputs for 1200 euros, the average price dla Digi002). If you're a little handy and you will know a little computer / sound, for beginners I would recommend the Digi002 but this is only my opinion ... Preamp Premire seem nice view, virtually no latency so far, comes with soft very clear. Just what worries firewire very restrictive, but once rolling rgler any a priori

- What characteristics have motivated your choice?

All! Firewire, the number of inputs and outputs, stand-alone aspect of the card mix, mini screen integrated monitoring, etc. format.

- For what purpose?

Replace my Digi 002 for my work and my personal friendly sessions for friends. The amateur, but demanding!

- What is your config (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)?

Two configs for now, a dual G5 and a MacBook 2GHz. In other words, that sound values ​​with respect to a map Motu.

- Which instruments and systems (console, preamp, DTD ...) you use it and how connections? ...

No mixer, the card takes care of herself very well, just a preamp with digital outputs upstream and / or the same for 10 entries. Instrumentation classical guitar, bass, microphone, keyboard etc..

UTILIZATION

- The installation is done it without problems?

Plug and play, can be used without installing drivers, but you still have to install (and reboot) if you want to use the Cue Mix Console.

- Have you experienced any incompatibilities?

No
- The general configuration is easy?

It is clear, simple, effective! A real treat!

- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...

Light, but also practical. At the same time it is a sound card is not very complicated.

GETTING STARTED

- The drivers are stable?

Yes!

- Are they often updated?

No idea.

- Are they often updated?

With a Mac and a Motu? Digital Performer of course! Machfive, Bias Peak and some VSTi instruments.
- What you get lag?

It must be played to a quarter of a micron of hair! In other words, zero latency, or when I play faster than my shadow!
- How many tracks you get to record / play time? ...

A record, as far as I input, ie 10. Without any sign of weakness or dropping from the card or computer (1GB RAM for the portable version, 2GB for desktop).

Read, for now my biggest project is 36 tracks and it runs itself without squealing.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?

Ten days to be significant.

- What is so special that you like most and least?

<img src="img.audiofanzine.com/img/v35/icones/plus.gif" class="plusmoins" width="35" height="11"> Subject to the mic preamps, really large, the dynamics of the map in general, very powerful, comprehensive connectivity, console CueMix really excellent, the robustness of the case, the solid appearance of the rest elsewhere etc.. !
<img src="img.audiofanzine.com/img/v35/icones/minus.gif" class="plusmoins" width="35" height="11"> we need small fingers to use the Trim buttons or volume, the front is complete but the space is still relatively small.

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

Too much!
- How would you rate the quality / price?

Really excellent! One moment I thought the card was the ideal mobile Firebox firewire, but frankly this is not small Motu beats everyone hands down. It is inconceivable for the price! Motu Congratulations!
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

I plan to acquire the same analog console and a second for a small studio inline 20-way! I think of when you see the high quality of the thing!
I want to thank Mr. Nours © for all his good advice that led me to buy this card! I just have to convince him to buy his own!

What characteristics have motivated your choice?
Firewire, many of exit, the front panel display, the size

For what purpose?
Home studio

What is your config (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)?
P4 3.2GHz 1.5GB of mem viv, 500GB HDD, and a PCI firewire card in the mail order

With which instruments or systems (console, preamp, DTD ...) do you use the connection and how?
Guitar, bass, DI, Keyboard

UTILIZATION

The installation is done it without problems?
Nickel

Have you experienced any incompatibilities?
No! (I've been lucky ?????)

The general configuration is easy?
Very simple software and audio cue mix setup very practical

The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Manual in English (a shame)

GETTING STARTED

The drivers are stable?
Yes

What software do you use most often?
Cubase SX3, Ableton Live

What you get lag?
Entree 13ms 10ms Out

How many tracks you get to record / play time? ...
Not tested but for now it runs without worry

OVERALL OPINION

How long have you use it?
2 weeks

What is so special that you like most and least?
The least: the small size of the buttons and little spaced
Plus: The value for money

Have you tried many other models before buying it?
I had a digi 001 before I get to lower the latency with the motu
I tested the digi 002 which was less stable on my system and the side was less convenient transport

With experience, you do again this choice? ...
For now, yes! Now we will see life??

Use only portable with firewire connection
toshiba p100-153
vsti cubase + + keyboard emu x board 25
tronic m / Vangard / Z3TA

UTILIZATION

Yes, no worries, the manual can be more explicit but hey! was used in computing to dbrouiller as can be

GETTING STARTED

Nothing to say ...

OVERALL OPINION

Since about a month. I like the quality of manufacture as I travel often and I tried building an interface that can srieuse rsister my dplacements. sound, dynamic trs Submitted ...
I have a firebox and then the diffrence means motu case does not heat up too much (I was in Poland these days, so climate).
connectivity of mobile enough for me so happy!
I find the front and back cover charge but trs MOTU had to make an effort to cram all the connections. I wish I can use it without external power on the move but it is a problem of laptop, I'm serious shit!
and then the software suite that helps me is nothing I CABASE the first hour, so hard for me to pass that offers me a MOTU. I do not regret my purchase, trs good audio interface, really.

I was looking to replace a certe excellent but a little old DIGI 001 Digidesign especially because of the inability to connect this card on a laptop. I wanted to find the same range of connection and the same quality preamp without neutral wind, etc.. There is no 36 such cards on the market. The MOTU is well positioned in price / quality ratio. I heard the good of the Presonus FIREBOX but the number of entries seemed right.

I also bought this card for the DSP which seems less CPU seek another card and it was an argument of weight for my old laptop.

I use the MOTU as home-made studio for guitars, vocals, bass, synth, etc.. I have no preamp or console because I believe that the MOTU preamp is sufficient to themselves and the fact that it can act as a standalone mixer offered me to buy a console.

My config is divided between a Dell P4 3GHz, 512 RAM and an old-Fujitsu laptop running at only 1.88 ghz and 256 RAM. When I asked if the MOTU fonctionneriat on it, the stores told me that yes, "which is the soft food, not the map" ... rather a good sign!

UTILIZATION

By installing the MOTU I had fond memories for long sessions at the con with the old stuff. They really rose to that level. I must say that my DIGI OO1 had six years and I did not have any other card in the meantime.

I did not even used the CD that came and went the last chopper drivers on the MOTU site. Instalation without any worries, being careful to start with first install the drivers, click to accept a few here and there, restart, once registry cleaning, plug and presto it worked first time.

I see guys on the forum galèreent with stories of IRQ conflicts in the bios where I do not know what ... damage, I had no trouble ... Perhaps the fact that my PC is not a gas plant and I customized runs on the Intel base. When buying, keep hanging on the compatibility between the card and PC components. We often pale with exotic configs hacked in every sense.

Then, for the config, it&#39;s about setting the soft ... Just know it.

These remarks are also valid on the laptop, no worries ... but I plan to use it only to the taking off solo ... logically not make a whole mixes old nanard like that and knees.

In any case no cracking on 2, once the adjustments made.

But ... at the beginning is not easy to navigate their stories mix console thing, and this especially as they damn manual is in English and I had beautiful send an email to the importer and to MOTU, I see nothing coming. In my opinion it is not yet translated. It is unacceptable these days to buy stuff for that price and not having a French manual. So, to date, I does not use all the possibilities of MOTU. But hey, we are in the world of computer music and the world of computer music is the démerder first.

So I stick 5 because although it works perfect, hello to any dip because of the manual in English.

GETTING STARTED

No problems with the drivers, they seem very stable.
I do not know if they are updated ... and then, as long as it works.
I have run 2 to 3 milliseconds of latency input and output ... Finally! It&#39;s totally transparent.

For the number of tracks, I have not done testing with a lot of runs.

Finally, the most important and then I can compare that against my DIGI 001 which was already very good. The SOUND!

It&#39;s pretty amazing how the MOTU is transparent. I rapprelle registry renewal of my debut digital 8-track Korg, it was clean but cold. Here, the sound is warm, clear, precise, detailed ... and especially no breath and that&#39;s excellent. I think the entries are all symmetrical. DIGI on, I used to spend my Jazz Bass with plugs for obtenr sound I wanted. And at a time I bypassed the plugs and found the direct sound of the bass through the preamp is simply excellent. Returning to the essence of sound with such a device.

A surprising detail caught my old sheets and listening again badly encoded MP3. The DIGI, treble sounded logically wrong and there on the MOTU, it does not forgive. One senses immediately that we have a much higher definition, the defects do not pass. The rendering is very analytical and transcribed all the errors of mix and mastering. I have not yet done so to mix with the MOTU, but I know I will enjoy to remix projects for former chopper defects. In short, it&#39;s precision and sense immediately that we are not dealing with the beginner stuff.

OVERALL OPINION

One month

Plus:
- The high definition sound, transparent preamps
The potential for mix-standalone (what joy to be able to connect without hearing all the fan of the PC!)
- The seriousness in building
- One arm, one rule and it works

Minimum:
- French manual not doing that ls routing options are not to enter évideentes

MOTU&#39;s reputation is second to none. It is sometimes the scope of spending a little more for such quality and yet, I find that the price of this card is fully justified.

I was looking for a sound card to perform a digital input-output SPDIF, MIDI, at least 6 audio inputs and 8 outputs, all in 24 bits and 48 kHz, which fits well at the MAC, size 1 U and a reasonable price for recording, editing and mix.
In short, for a music production simple and not too expensive.
Recently, the manufacturers realize that the cards more than 1000 euros is not available and may be too teams for working in home studio. Thus merger of smaller modules and more "effective" much cheaper.
The choice of the ultralite has been plutt the meeting of this trend that I find more practical and less technical and Will Fidler to stay through the choice of the software used. The output of this card fell so good.
But Reason derrire, 768 M of RAM and processor that runs 800 million, we forget.
Too rich. We must remain prudent and use the applications separately. Samples of the sounds in Reason Performer running in sync via Rewire, Reason and the exit process if ncessaire, it works well. All dpend as the fawn you dial
The sound of the instrument taken voice go through pre-amp in FOCUSRITE symtriques and other records of the Previous or spdif jack.
If you have a computer system connected to a home cinma preamp, connect the 8 outputs with 6, 7 or 8 discrete channels for multichannel COST.
To connect a guitar, an XLR jack is high impdance front. Another is derrire.
Personally, I use the XLR front for a classic talkback.

UTILIZATION

The installation was done properly.
Called out the inputs and outputs of the card and the names appear in the audio software. Peinard.
The manual IS in English. So it is perfect to Improve your english language.
Read aloud for pronunciation, "Is in zzzzzzze zzzzzzzzzzze sound box"
Srieusement a translation for Christmas, with gift wrap, has rassurrait well.

GETTING STARTED

Drivers ok
Utiliss Software: Digital Performer and Reason
Latency: I must verifies
I record a track for both the moment.

OVERALL OPINION

3 months of use alone.
It is small and "box" though.
The sound is good enough for a little prod. This issue is so relative that I can not venture further. If you are a purist, low acute transient harmonics blablabla has to pay. Cher.
If you like the catch of his nomadic, with a handy map, when the same sound quality, right price and not too limited, it is probably the card for you.
Also, if you have thin fingers to turn the pots in faade, fine. Too small for any obviousness.
If you turn on MAC intel is compatible.
Otherwise, rflchissez what you want to do before you buy, that's all.

- What technical specifications motivated your choice?
mic preamp that goes up by three levels of 60dB dpart + 24 dB not prs
- For what purpose?
home studio, sound model for
- What is your config (motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)?
IBM T41 CPU 1.5 RAM 256 DD 4200T / M VIA FIREWIRE PACMCIA
- Which instruments or Systmes (console, prampli, DTD ...) you use it and how connections? ...
RODE K2 Cubase SX
High end Hi-Fi costs on

UTILIZATION

No, but fortunately there were other opinions:
the public opinion: If like me who has a FireWire PCMCIA (laptop), the card should be impractical with a brand Controller Texas Lucent ... cf. WWW.MOTU.COM
Darty Belkin 50 3 6-pin FireWire cable 6 to a 4 with Texas and Controller
So
Manual useless for me because AudioDesk and succinct brochure

GETTING STARTED

Absolutely
V.1.0 home if I do not know a little card rcente
Cubase SX
Setup 32bit 96Khz = 256 Buffer I / O 3.646ms 2.781ms (recording)
Setup 44.1 kHz 16 bit = 128 Buffer I / O 4.172ms 3.152ms (for 50 tracks cost a Stros)
with only 256 of ram!

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
for several weeks
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
volume that supplies the lamps and adjustable static accuracy prs but not a pure grain cd its net to capture just the background noise surrounding pushing some 60db pramps become deprecated
robustness of matrial utiliss
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
EDIROL FA 66 410 M-AUDIO
- How do you report qualitprix?
TB
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
if there is not technologically better tomorrow