Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Steinberg Cubase 5 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Steinberg Cubase 5
Images
1/191
Steinberg Cubase 5

General Sequencer from Steinberg belonging to the Cubase series

ikikomori ikikomori
Published on 12/03/11 at 02:33
Working on cubase since cubase, then the implementation date and new versions are always more easily ACCS and installation and operation more stable.
I work on protools and just as Logic, and all about management Manir his work, none is better, no diffrence export, but Manir work that changes each software.
Each has its intrt / strengths and weaknesses.
No inconsistency except for some that open omf better on Protools and Logic on DEFINITIONS better.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Nothing to report in terms of running bug.
Still less latency than ProTools and Logic equivalent
I'm on macpro quad 2.7 10GB ram-and-fuse.
Trs worked well with my Motu 896HD and now even better with my Lynx Aurora 16-VT.
(AES16 PCIe and more!)
UAD 2 plug and waves, Focusrite LiquidMix, everything works!

OVERALL OPINION

Went so used cubase 6 1 year, it is better to spend six direct but if the opportunity or destocking 5 is a gas plant. And in the studio I can say is that if does not work, either machine or software, I DGIG the bte because no time to waste time groups.
I teach it (and reason) and since I have 4 more new lves for my classes because it works better.
It should also amliorer beat dtective house, and will integrate plug portico etc. .. As with basic dj Logic is expensive and better place for a composer / mixer, with its all in one.
Similarly small video tutorials (but not directly ask for in the box to form the purchase of the new amliorations and to make best use his new toy) would be welcome.