All user reviews for the Steinberg Cubase SX 3

When installing there is no specific problem but the use of standards problem I encounter, such as The definition of my instruments noon. The delete does not work. APRS contact Steinberg I shave my hard drive to remove the previous version and this is unacceptable! I will return to another software.
Another ngatif use the cl that takes a USB port. Why not put the software directly on the cl?

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

Pentium IV 2.4 Ghz
Windows XP
I could not test the performance

OVERALL OPINION

It's a gas plant with a lot of options, the set is dense. We should be able customize the display much more than what is proposed. There are lots of options that should be able to hide and activate only when needed. This makes it all too complex.

I had absolutely no compatibly issues with Cubase, it works perfectly with my windows computer and can be rewired with fl studio and a few other smaller programs that I use. The instruction manual will give you everything you need to get up and running and to get started without a single problem. So definitely read your manuals because at first Cubase can be a little overwhelming if your coming from another program. But once you learn the basic of the program you will then automatically learn the more advanced stuff on your own.


SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

The configuration of this software is very stable and I have had zero crashes since I started using it a year ago. I get a high performance out of this software and it used low CPU unlike other programs that will swallow your CPU hard! This software (cubase) also comes with some stock sounds and presets that will blow your mind. Its ready to create wonderful music right out of the box. Most of all the options you need to work your way through the program are right in front of you with the main menu options.


OVERALL OPINION

The best thing I like about this software is its compatibility with so many other programs, and you can rewire it or use it as a host. It comes ready right out of the box with industry standard sounds that other programs done come with. If I had to get back again, I would have chosen this software first over any other when I first started producing. This is my first go round with Cubase , but I am very satisfied with this product and I will continue to stay with them and upgrade to the next version or to every version for that matter when they come out. I definitely recommend this software to all producers.

I used Steinberg Cubase SX 3 for a brief while before I switched systems and changed over to Pro Tools a number of years ago.  I ran SX 2.0 for the most part, but also ran this version for a little while.  This version is now pretty outdated, but it does still float around there.  I didn't have any issues as far as installation goes, as it was a pretty simple process overall, however, after using it for a little while I did have some performance issues which I will speak more about in the next section.  As far as the interface of Cubase SX 3 goes, it is definitely better than its predecessor in 2.0.  It is easy to use and offers up a lot more features as well.  The manual for SX 3 is pretty complete, but I didn't need to consult it too often since it is a pretty easy piece of software to use.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

When I ran Steinberg Cubase SX 3, I ran it on a Hewlett Packard Pavilion dv8000 lap top.  The computer had a 3.0 GHz single core processor and 2 GB of RAM.  I was also running SX 2.0 on the same system before I upgraded up.  However, I found that 3.0 wasn't as friendly in terms of performance as 2.0 was for whatever reason, which is part of the reason that I switched over to a Mac and now run Pro Tools.  Every so often I would get some error messages and the whole session would crash, which is definitely not something that I was interested.  I was able to recover the session afterward without a problem.  While it didn't happen often, it was often enough where it became annoying.  However, as far as the performance of the software in terms of speed, I was able to run the software just fine with a good amount of tracks and plug-ins...


OVERALL OPINION

While Steinberg Cubase SX 3 is definitely a powerful piece of software, if you're interested in a sequencer of this type, I'd recommend looking into the newer versions of Cubase.  Although I haven't used the new ones as extensively, they have a better interface and offer up more plug-ins and better performance.  Having said this, SX 3 is a fine piece of software on its own that will get the job done for the most part.  If you're looking for your first piece of recording software and are on a tight budget, but like the Cubase family, it might be worth it to get this version and save a bit of money if you don't necessarily need all of the new features that come with Cubase 4 and 5.

(Originally written by dj Alec Trusk/translated from Audiofanzine FR)
No installation problems. Very quick...

No incompatibilities.

Very easy configuration.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

AMD 5000+ Dual-Core, 3 GB Ram, 500 GB HDD, Audiophile USB sound card

The software is pretty stable.

OVERALL OPINION

I've been using it for two years. I won't change in the near future...

Pros: everything...

Cons: none...

I tested Cubase SL2 and Cubase VST 5 and I find the SX3 version is the best one.

A bit too expensive but it's worth it.

I'm pretty sure I'd buy it again.