Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Pioneer CMX 3000
Images
1/138

All user reviews for the Pioneer CMX 3000

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Filter
4.2/5
(21 reviews)
52 %
(11 reviews)
33 %
(7 reviews)
5 %
(1 review)
Write a user review
Best value: Excellent
Users reviews
  • tidjacktidjack
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 11/12/04 at 10:22
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I have one friend who owns this board !!!! Frankly nothing to say! Finally, perhaps the scratch that does not give the effect of a real scratch! I have also had the opportunity of esseil evening with him to techno! Thanks to its counters bpm very accurate !! and also are self beats! Sometimes maybe not sync well but not often! also nothing to say!
  • ludo2185ludo2185
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 12/26/04 at 15:25
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I tried in evening
    it's a good deck but the scratch is not really top,
    otherwise the cue are hot and loops.
  • watts-djwatts-dj

    Pioneer CMX 3000 bombings in power

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 06/25/13 at 05:20
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I was small toy and follows very satisfied, I buy used € 250 in June 2013 and do not regret my purchase.

    Yes I tried other mp3 turntables before and I have custody in addition to Pioneer CMX 3000.
  • pcopco

    No regrets

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 05/17/12 at 15:50
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I use it for over 10 years
    I had tried other products before but of lower quality (Gemini, ..)

    In my case, the characteristic is the size, flat systems can not suit me because I use a disco bar with Technics 1200MKII, so I have no alternative: I need a system that fits under the table to mix with the remote extension thereof

    report excellent price / quality

    Repeat this choice? I do not see other possibilities and considering its quality: YES without hesitation
  • titouutitouu

    product and super simple utlisation

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 01/14/12 at 03:40
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    The Pioneer CMX 3000 is really a good product for its features and ease of use (Multi-format CD Audio, CD-R, CD-RW, function "Emergency Loop
    3 Hot Cues, Automatic synchronization of tempos, Scratch Mode, Wave Function Display, 2 digital outputs, Master Tempo, Loop adjustable IN and OUT, Inserting the CD slot in, Legato Link.
    Very good for the mobile disco.
  • rirerorirero
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 01/13/12 at 18:17
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    How long have you use it? / I use 6 months and regret having sold
    What is so special that you love the most, least? Easy to take charge
    Have you tried many other models before buying it? Not really but I try I approve!
  • sissebsisseb
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 01/07/04 at 15:17
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I use it for almost two years discomobile.
    No worries, though orders trs think, easily accessible.
    Automatic enchantment, but effective on the securities o trsrgulier rhythm is otherwise useless.
    Scratch function, not a scratch rel, but plutt take as an effect (there are indeed delayed the resumption of the music when it lche o ring).
    The hot starts are INTERESTED trs and efficient.
    It gre CD TEXT is a great feature when you have a computer drive.
    Its default: Accs blocked the tracks when introducing the CD. Wait until the CD is recognized by the player to change tracks. Function quickly becomes tiresome as scratch limit. If not say anything, it is Designed, like all Pioneer CD …
    Read more
    I use it for almost two years discomobile.
    No worries, though orders trs think, easily accessible.
    Automatic enchantment, but effective on the securities o trsrgulier rhythm is otherwise useless.
    Scratch function, not a scratch rel, but plutt take as an effect (there are indeed delayed the resumption of the music when it lche o ring).
    The hot starts are INTERESTED trs and efficient.
    It gre CD TEXT is a great feature when you have a computer drive.
    Its default: Accs blocked the tracks when introducing the CD. Wait until the CD is recognized by the player to change tracks. Function quickly becomes tiresome as scratch limit. If not say anything, it is Designed, like all Pioneer CD players.
    See less
  • djnrickdjnrick
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 11/07/04 at 16:30
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Hi, I'm near the 2 years I use the CMX 3000, c frankly a good machine, what's missing is a box built-in effects. perfect timing wheel, hot cue are top, you can even back your loop directly above and in the evening simply insert your CD for the machine to recognize the very interresting. Which sometimes is not great is that it may take some time to load some cdr burned, but it is not common. If you want to mix plates only CMX should do the trick. on the other hand do not expect to scratch with a CDJ 1000 or 800 elsewhere besides that I have 2 cdj 800.

    Finally it was good stuff you will not have unpleasant surprises.
    Read more
    Hi, I'm near the 2 years I use the CMX 3000, c frankly a good machine, what's missing is a box built-in effects. perfect timing wheel, hot cue are top, you can even back your loop directly above and in the evening simply insert your CD for the machine to recognize the very interresting. Which sometimes is not great is that it may take some time to load some cdr burned, but it is not common. If you want to mix plates only CMX should do the trick. on the other hand do not expect to scratch with a CDJ 1000 or 800 elsewhere besides that I have 2 cdj 800.

    Finally it was good stuff you will not have unpleasant surprises.
    See less
  • Dj fou 87Dj fou 87
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 11/11/04 at 12:18
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    It's been a year since I use this machine and its progress! perfect curls, perfect timing, hot cue well tudi can even record the loops and it's cool. However the scratch is not at all gnial but hey, a platinum as it has for the first mix! And it did a good job!
  • dj conejodj conejo
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 01/06/05 at 17:06
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    .. I have a platinum cmx 3000 for 1 year .. and I am disappointed by the quality of the optical unit that Pioneer uses (a simple block of Philips) is a block found on mini chain first prix.j 've already changed the time of a block within a year from this fragility in reading it is perfect, especially in calibration, and startup.
  • lacharrierlacharrier
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 02/24/05 at 15:21
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    J'utilisecette plate for about a year and I am not satisfied prs. We arrive to take in hand after 10 minutes, each button possde a function (not like the Denon or you have to play with normment button and thank you for not taking his hand)
    It Ragit like clockwork I scratch with Mrs. Russ without too much problem!
    When even a small default: the platinum "plantquot; several times in the middle of night and it took the rdmarrer. But with a head cleaning reading everything went arranged. The loops are just perfect there is a small dcalage tempo when using the "emergency loop" which can Dranger in a mix.
    I think this is a good choice for this award because two platinum brand with its funct…
    Read more
    J'utilisecette plate for about a year and I am not satisfied prs. We arrive to take in hand after 10 minutes, each button possde a function (not like the Denon or you have to play with normment button and thank you for not taking his hand)
    It Ragit like clockwork I scratch with Mrs. Russ without too much problem!
    When even a small default: the platinum "plantquot; several times in the middle of night and it took the rdmarrer. But with a head cleaning reading everything went arranged. The loops are just perfect there is a small dcalage tempo when using the "emergency loop" which can Dranger in a mix.
    I think this is a good choice for this award because two platinum brand with its function as a low plusde 1000 we find no beacoup. Pioneer thank you!
    See less
  • The saintThe saint
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 10/04/05 at 14:24
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Bought 2 weeks ago in a secondhand cash converters.

    What I like most, cestla grip general, no need to record all functions fall under the fingers without looking too, is the pioneer. Hot cues I is not so much that it finally, finally, less than I imagined. The jog is quite plastic, but for niquel ratraper a tempo. Against it by no means a scratch machine (you can tell by the way).

    I tried the cdj500 (IOP) is a simpa use the axis9 (numark) works normally and without + cdj20 (gemini) before, but not for the purpose of a purchase because it is not what 'I needed.

    Excellent value for money, I got it for the price of a cdj 800. By comparing the cmx 3000 is the equivalent of 2 CDJ1000 fo…
    Read more
    Bought 2 weeks ago in a secondhand cash converters.

    What I like most, cestla grip general, no need to record all functions fall under the fingers without looking too, is the pioneer. Hot cues I is not so much that it finally, finally, less than I imagined. The jog is quite plastic, but for niquel ratraper a tempo. Against it by no means a scratch machine (you can tell by the way).

    I tried the cdj500 (IOP) is a simpa use the axis9 (numark) works normally and without + cdj20 (gemini) before, but not for the purpose of a purchase because it is not what 'I needed.

    Excellent value for money, I got it for the price of a cdj 800. By comparing the cmx 3000 is the equivalent of 2 CDJ1000 for the price of a cdj 800 (of course if not Scratch, and this is my case).
    EDIT after 1 month of use:

    so I just had my first freeze (the screens block but the music is still running) of a I do not know what but the two old cds cds were burned and she had just 1:30 to mix a little in the barbaric times So good legs.

    Stability level I am a bit disappointed with Pioneer notament freeze because of this (the only one in a month so I hope that there will be no more), if y 'after a small reflexes have no gender not start the music before the loop button've finished clgnoter (storing anti shock 4.5sec) if the sound starts and then turns off after 10sec.

    Except to the mix in his room is the ideal (a ca € 1000 is cheap though so you have to look to the new has come) shame that Pioneer did not put a system to update as Denon.

    But otherwise it remains an excellent double drive, it took me some time to take control of 100%.

    So here a few spots from the stability (just freeze in fact) it's still a good animal.

    Rating 8 / 10 because you can always do better, even if one approaches the top.
    See less
  • maestro_84maestro_84
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 03/07/06 at 06:14
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I have this double platinum for about 5 years is a real treat, even if I have not had the opportunity to test many other decks, I realize that it really makes a lot of things Contrary to another, such as changing the tempo keeping the pitch (this is not found on many decks, or even any, may be the cmx-5000 I do not know ....) and even level accuracies it's a terrible walk, with settings cue with amazingly simple ... and even for the scratch I think we do really cool stuff easily; system with snap discs course .... short test it, just a night you will see!

    I blame him one bit is not read mp3 cd ... but hey, I understand that Pioneer wants to keep a certain quality so we forgive ....

    I …
    Read more
    I have this double platinum for about 5 years is a real treat, even if I have not had the opportunity to test many other decks, I realize that it really makes a lot of things Contrary to another, such as changing the tempo keeping the pitch (this is not found on many decks, or even any, may be the cmx-5000 I do not know ....) and even level accuracies it's a terrible walk, with settings cue with amazingly simple ... and even for the scratch I think we do really cool stuff easily; system with snap discs course .... short test it, just a night you will see!

    I blame him one bit is not read mp3 cd ... but hey, I understand that Pioneer wants to keep a certain quality so we forgive ....

    I had paid 1200 euros almost 5 years ago
    I easily put 999 euros, if I had to buy one ... but it's not, it still works as well, nothing to report!
    See less
  • sust'mdsust'md
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 03/07/06 at 10:12
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Hi to all
    I use a CMX 3000 for about 5 years.
    Before I mixais with a Denon DN 2500.
    At the beginning I found the system of the wheel not obvious, but once you get the hang of, what up ... how easy to mix. When I look back on my old dn2500 I galley to mix so it's better to start with the CMX 3000 ....!
    in 5 years never any down, just once a CD that refused to read, but otherwise it works great, just one regret is that there have only 3 points per CD memorable. Dn of the 2500 memo was best for
  • boxmisteurboxmisteur
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 05/08/06 at 07:05
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Product not to buy.

    Loading time of inedit.du cd ever seen. The CMX 5000 is about 2 faith faster!
    secondly because I have a poor reliability of renvoyr mine every 6 months with Pioneer to make it revised. (6 months of use for one month to repair c not too bad!)
    Either buy cdj 800 if you can afford to be a pioneer cmx 5000, as remains of great fiabilité.dommage there are exceptions ...
    Fortunately mine is sold!
  • TecktolinoTecktolino
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 05/05/06 at 12:04
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Trs good CD decks, this is three years since I use them and no stress PBS, certainly c'tait era but now face the top competition, it has even better for the bcp prices ...... but you will only have platinum, so for beginners it's a good deck, with everything you need, loops cue, hot cues, master tempo, etc. .... only regret the scratch is not terrible at all, not break a three legged duck, but to start in the top-end mobile disco is not bad .... I put 7 of 10 from what is currently on the market today

    Using APRS 4 years
    Still nothing to say, I have not had a problem with these turntables CD's, I love them and I think I'll keep them all my life ... YES

    I say that I would do without t…
    Read more
    Trs good CD decks, this is three years since I use them and no stress PBS, certainly c'tait era but now face the top competition, it has even better for the bcp prices ...... but you will only have platinum, so for beginners it's a good deck, with everything you need, loops cue, hot cues, master tempo, etc. .... only regret the scratch is not terrible at all, not break a three legged duck, but to start in the top-end mobile disco is not bad .... I put 7 of 10 from what is currently on the market today

    Using APRS 4 years
    Still nothing to say, I have not had a problem with these turntables CD's, I love them and I think I'll keep them all my life ... YES

    I say that I would do without the same pb choice ....

    What I expect from Pioneer in the same plates that read DVD-MP3 and I say BRAVO ...

    I add one point to the robustness
    See less
  • dj fonkdj fonk
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 07/09/06 at 08:57
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Hi all. For those who have concerns with the CMX 3000, your mix should be reviewed because it works very well. Loop perfect simple to use because the ca smith and very fiable.Il is true for emergency against the loop loses ca 1bpm but nothing really recal what mechant.L advantage of text condition cd pensser say when burning cd.Startable from a DJM 500
    What's better, a perfect sound.
  • hotmichhotmich
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 12/31/06 at 09:16
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    How long have you use it?

    I use it for one week to purchase priceminister

    What is the particular feature you like best and least?

    trs trs simple to use! the record's only cover it serves me for being protected from dusts: P! non srieusement in 1 hour it was getting started!
    I do not think it is weak, maybe the lack of effect and not reading the mp3 but it's no big deal ...

    Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

    Premire is not my plate, I just tried to quickly do the dns but I prefer the 1000 cmx3000

    How do you report qualitprix?

    So it's expensive pioneer! we must know what you want! 1100 new but you can find used and in very good condition for about 500! trs…
    Read more
    How long have you use it?

    I use it for one week to purchase priceminister

    What is the particular feature you like best and least?

    trs trs simple to use! the record's only cover it serves me for being protected from dusts: P! non srieusement in 1 hour it was getting started!
    I do not think it is weak, maybe the lack of effect and not reading the mp3 but it's no big deal ...

    Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

    Premire is not my plate, I just tried to quickly do the dns but I prefer the 1000 cmx3000

    How do you report qualitprix?

    So it's expensive pioneer! we must know what you want! 1100 new but you can find used and in very good condition for about 500! trs bone quality but I can find one cheap though, sof of opportunity!

    Exprience with, you will do again this choice? ...

    yes no Siter! trs good plate! me that beginners in the DJing I have all on the Russian master! trs simple, complete, great ...!
    See less
  • djmagicballdjmagicball
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 07/05/07 at 23:31
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I use the dual player for five years, never any problems.

    What I like is the accuracy and reliability of this device. It reacts to the quarter turn. Super top, CD text, hot cue, the brightness compared to his brother CMX 5000 much better. As for weakness, I would say that the scratch is absolutely worthless on that drive. Nothing to do with a CDJ 1000 or 800. Otherwise, easy to use and very homogeneous, its nickel.

    Before I swore by Denon, I had three generations of DN-2000 F and of course the DN-2500. Level longevity, nothing to do, they are machines fragile and often I send them back to the service or maintenance. Fragility of drawers, power ... I tried to DN 2100 and 2600, only to …
    Read more
    I use the dual player for five years, never any problems.

    What I like is the accuracy and reliability of this device. It reacts to the quarter turn. Super top, CD text, hot cue, the brightness compared to his brother CMX 5000 much better. As for weakness, I would say that the scratch is absolutely worthless on that drive. Nothing to do with a CDJ 1000 or 800. Otherwise, easy to use and very homogeneous, its nickel.

    Before I swore by Denon, I had three generations of DN-2000 F and of course the DN-2500. Level longevity, nothing to do, they are machines fragile and often I send them back to the service or maintenance. Fragility of drawers, power ... I tried to DN 2100 and 2600, only to loop is Chinese. Then I had the CDJ 100 which will remain by far the readers of the best value for money, I tested the 800 and CDJ 1000 CDJ 1000 The tricks played at me long to recognize a CD, then I ' not like the place because it takes to make it with two turntables and a table. So, I opted for the new double CD Rack with recorder and amplifier feedback and control, for example below the table mix flat. Handling all events.

    Level value for money, I must say I am very happy with my purchase. He has five years and this will no doubt be my last double CD. A remake, I want the same. For scratching, blah, it depends on the tastes and colors, it's not my thing. So I'm going. I had paid just under € 1,000 at the time, it is Paying-off in heavy use on Saturdays and some Fridays. The only thing I still do from time to time, it's blowing the light units, accessible from below, a screw, a valve. Then, a cleaning CD and it goes away.

    Missing is the effect as the CDJ 100 and 200, but if you have a Pioneer table, not need. Too bad the tables with Pioneer can not hold a candle CD players of the same brand. Except perhaps the new generation 800 and DJM 1000.
    See less
  • FP UserFP User
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 10/31/08 at 16:00
    Everything excelent.... but I 'd like a Reverse swith and a better scratch like CDJ 1000

    Price paid

    900

    Sound quality: Good

    User interface: excelent The manual: I didn't need it All is easy for a fast mix

    Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
    Posted by: Unknown (January 1-, 2003)
  • FP UserFP User
    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 10/31/08 at 16:00
    It has everything you need.

    excelent sound quality, no problems at all.

    Very easy to use, very intuitive. For a newbie like me, it was about a week. From then on, you only have to continue playing with it.

    the cd's tend to unload not so smoothly after a year. the jog wheel gets a little bit dirty and doesn´t flow as before

    This is an excelent piece of equipment, I would buy it again if I had to. Very well made, no loose bottons, the pitch slider works very well after a year of banging mixes.

    Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
    Posted by: wakus ( 5-, 2004)