Fane03 « alas ... Do not buy! »
Published on 02/20/11 at 11:37Initially, the receiver is attractive: a "Marshall" 100W. But
UTILIZATION
Test: a blast worthy of the Tramontana. Power, certainly, but the effects incorporated, activated (north wind) or disabled (southerly wind), makes this amp a "trick" to avoid. I tried with a U.S. Standard Fender 50th anniversary, a Telecaster and a 52 MN Lag The Beast My guitars ... they are all rotten? No! I tried another. Souffle lesser
SOUNDS
... But ultimately having already amp Fender I traded cons a Marshall AS50 (subject 100 euros more!) Who very suitable clear sound ( Martin Acoustic, Takamine attention to low, and electrical Startocaster). AS 50 lacks power but the sound is very good (and easy to use: volume, tone, stereo chorus, anti-feedback). The MG100DFG, forget it! JMP / Fane
OVERALL OPINION
Other models Advisor: Marshall Valvestate-hand (amazing, I regret that I sold), the Marshall as102, or the Fender 212R for the wealthy: the Fender Twin .
Note to MG100DFX: 1 / 20
UTILIZATION
Test: a blast worthy of the Tramontana. Power, certainly, but the effects incorporated, activated (north wind) or disabled (southerly wind), makes this amp a "trick" to avoid. I tried with a U.S. Standard Fender 50th anniversary, a Telecaster and a 52 MN Lag The Beast My guitars ... they are all rotten? No! I tried another. Souffle lesser
SOUNDS
... But ultimately having already amp Fender I traded cons a Marshall AS50 (subject 100 euros more!) Who very suitable clear sound ( Martin Acoustic, Takamine attention to low, and electrical Startocaster). AS 50 lacks power but the sound is very good (and easy to use: volume, tone, stereo chorus, anti-feedback). The MG100DFG, forget it! JMP / Fane
OVERALL OPINION
Other models Advisor: Marshall Valvestate-hand (amazing, I regret that I sold), the Marshall as102, or the Fender 212R for the wealthy: the Fender Twin .
Note to MG100DFX: 1 / 20