Become a member
Become a member

or
Log in
Log in

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Sennheiser HD 202
Images
1/5

All user reviews for the Sennheiser HD 202

Studio headphone from Sennheiser belonging to the HD series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Filter
Keywords
Average Score:
( 3.6/5 based on 38 reviews )
7 reviews
18 %
16 reviews
42 %
6 reviews
16 %
5 reviews
13 %
3 reviews
8 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • Anonymous

    Sennheiser HD 202Published on 06/10/08 at 08:11
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    - How long have you use it?

    2 months, if I remember correctly.

    -What Is the particular feature you like best and least? *

    BASS! The deep bass that sound good and mdiums that sound. Acute leave when even a little adsirer ...

    - Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

    The old JVC my parents - ', but becoming unwearable (rotten foam ...), I had to buy another one: 202

    - How do you report qualitprix?

    A 22 headphones, and for that ... Excellent quality.

    - With the exprience, you do again this choice ...?

    It's a DJ headset base, and I used me for listening studio; emphasizing the bass, it makes a false picture of the mix, for studio use, has avoided so. But to p…
    Read more
    - How long have you use it?

    2 months, if I remember correctly.

    -What Is the particular feature you like best and least? *

    BASS! The deep bass that sound good and mdiums that sound. Acute leave when even a little adsirer ...

    - Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

    The old JVC my parents - ', but becoming unwearable (rotten foam ...), I had to buy another one: 202

    - How do you report qualitprix?

    A 22 headphones, and for that ... Excellent quality.

    - With the exprience, you do again this choice ...?

    It's a DJ headset base, and I used me for listening studio; emphasizing the bass, it makes a false picture of the mix, for studio use, has avoided so. But to play with headphones on a synth or listen to his music player ... Yes, I remake this choice, but for accuracy of all use; not for my mix.
    See less
  • jiaimefjiaimef

    excellent for the price

    Sennheiser HD 202Published on 03/15/13 at 08:57
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I use it for 5 years. I had a lot of headphones and at this price, I have not found better. Well balanced with bass boosted ... résonnablement model above HD 203 does not come close to the ankle. A buy without hesitation.
  • elastic59elastic59

    Typical Motorway money

    Sennheiser HD 202Published on 05/23/12 at 07:33
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    How long you use it? 5 years

    Did you tried many other models before buying it? not

    What is so special that you love the most, least? the + light price
    minimum: one can hurt ear when worn long.

    How would you rate the quality / price? good value for money
    With experience, you do again this choice? yes
  • Los TeignosLos Teignos

    Its rotten but tench

    Sennheiser HD 202Published on 03/18/03 at 14:48
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I've had about two months: I needed a headphone closed CONTRL cheap for my recording. I did not take the head comparison: I bought the one with the lowest prices in the shop (35!).

    So that's how 35 headphone? Bah ... Let's say it's relatively comfortable, relatively lightweight and relatively rotten in sound: everything seems to "cardboard" and the image is stro Troit. (I'm the extreme panner some tracks I m'loigner of evil from the center).

    I trs tonn seeing the enthusiastic opinion on the HD200, which I know, very much like it. The really, I find that there is no pleasure listening to music in this thing and I do not see how he could serve in the Home Studio environment for somethin…
    Read more
    I've had about two months: I needed a headphone closed CONTRL cheap for my recording. I did not take the head comparison: I bought the one with the lowest prices in the shop (35!).

    So that's how 35 headphone? Bah ... Let's say it's relatively comfortable, relatively lightweight and relatively rotten in sound: everything seems to "cardboard" and the image is stro Troit. (I'm the extreme panner some tracks I m'loigner of evil from the center).

    I trs tonn seeing the enthusiastic opinion on the HD200, which I know, very much like it. The really, I find that there is no pleasure listening to music in this thing and I do not see how he could serve in the Home Studio environment for something other than why I bought: tmoin use for recording. And above, it does the job: little or no repisse.

    As it is closed and it is cheap, so I recommend for this job. Otherwise, forget ...

    May 8, 2011 EDIT: The sound is still bad, but I have only 8 years old reconnatre APRS, he is still alive. And yet I am not careful. Well, the foams are in ruins, of course, and the wire is too long compltement spin but it is alive ...

    However, I am sidr to see people talk about sound quality on this headset. Must have cost anything else? Ms. 35, there are better Hi-Fi, but it is not closed to the o intrt, always, the HD202 ...
    See less
  • ArbustreArbustre

    Sennheiser HD 202Published on 09/07/03 at 16:16
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Well, it sr that the award should not ask for the moon. But my faith, well it insulates for sound recording and even if Mozart would have probably buried deep in his garden with his paws scraping rear, to serve in tmoin amplified music can be used. In addition, it is still INTERESTED listen to its production with hardware not empty by taking the time to its default DTECT and quality to give an ide of what the quidam with small speakers will be made at home.
  • TriYopTriYop

    Sennheiser HD 202Published on 02/08/04 at 06:29
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    made two months I use this headset and I'm sorry for almost the beginners.
    Even if the dynamics is well and that the headset does almost never saturates, trs same high level,
    the spectrum is really dsquilibr with a standard bump in the bass sound that swells ...
    The headphone is "almost" closed.
    Another problem is added the balance dj almost catastrophic
    The foam around the ears is Carment uncomfortable, way too small. So that (even with glasses for those who are) the headset is hard to bear on relatively hard leves.
    DO NOT BUY!
  • breedbreed

    Sennheiser HD 202Published on 11/16/04 at 14:47
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    This headphone is trs average quality, but for its price it dpanne. The sound is pretty strait moss tuft. At 30 euros, it is all the same good value quality price, but those seeking the quality may go their way.
  • JoneSmiceJoneSmice

    Sennheiser HD 202Published on 01/20/05 at 14:26
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    - At the sound is far from being terrible bass not too bad (although a little "stereo") but too Submitted, the upper register is not great and the high-medium, c is worse ...
    Bon coutable remains, all is not that bad but it's true that it is not tip top either ...

    - Insulation is not too bad, for drummers, is a lightweight but cases less "extreme" went well ... gnral plutt

    - For comfort, good ... the supra-aural tour, I am not too fan but ... A circuit circumaural (around the ear) t would use more discreet. But it's not just for its price range ...
    - The faux leather is not terribly comfortable, but also has the password.
    - on the other hand, a feeling that one discrtement whisp…
    Read more
    - At the sound is far from being terrible bass not too bad (although a little "stereo") but too Submitted, the upper register is not great and the high-medium, c is worse ...
    Bon coutable remains, all is not that bad but it's true that it is not tip top either ...

    - Insulation is not too bad, for drummers, is a lightweight but cases less "extreme" went well ... gnral plutt

    - For comfort, good ... the supra-aural tour, I am not too fan but ... A circuit circumaural (around the ear) t would use more discreet. But it's not just for its price range ...
    - The faux leather is not terribly comfortable, but also has the password.
    - on the other hand, a feeling that one discrtement whispered in the ear, as on my 280Pro: one feels the HP too prs of the ear. I will say that the contact pressure too high, but not the top CHARACTERISTICS at the site of Sennheiser ... I'll add a little thickness of foam (like home), I think the problem arduira.

    I give 5 as a note, because I think both sound than the insulation, comfort and quality manufacturing, it MRIT prs little mean, neither more nor less ...
    I think this is a good solution for home studios, small radios, to a large network headphone (live recording ),...

    A report qualitprix correct: I have not spent much time testing range, just the AKG K58 (version "professional" of K55) and I live off, without taking the time to cost: just too uncomfortable! I could not see spending more than 5 minutes on it ... But it is my opinion and only my opinion.

    Compar a HD280 but the same manufacturer of high-end dynamic headphones closed (the two extreme !)... Well, the diffrence in price is really justified: both products are not comparable.
    The HD280 is a good headphone and rev the HD202 is a product that dpanne well.

    I bought one to cost my CD in the misleading '(not want to get bitten my HD280!) And the monitor when recording (in the same piece that is no nearfield zicos ...).
    I think I will redeem at least one for dpanne or headphones for a network, if it takes time, though I took a good circumaural MODEL ...
    See less
  • Anonymous

    Sennheiser HD 202Published on 04/28/05 at 08:37
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I hd 265 headphones from the same brand and I can tell you that this headphone has a sound not so good, it generates the breath, hard to mix with the necessary basis, the price is finally over, not bad, but even with a walkman headset can mix too, lol, short, not good at all, even disappointed, I do not recommend it at all
  • Duke4funDuke4fun

    Sennheiser HD 202Published on 09/10/05 at 05:45
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I find the view very severe, we speak here of a headphone is 27 euros anyway. It is true that the comfort n 'are not great when you wear glasses, but the bass is really present unlike al hd 201. The sound is a little cartons, but we know the ca change easily with a good equalizer.
    A good buy for those who do not use the professional way (like before the pc).
    For TV, the HD 201 is sufficient because the was no need for deep bass and comfort is much better.
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.